Monitoring Threatened Species and Ecological Communities

(Ben Green) #1

436 Monitoring Threatened Species and Ecological Communities


declines in species or ecological communities. These five principles can be used to
overhaul and improve existing monitoring programs, as well as assist in the
development of new programs. Implementation of these principles does not
necessarily require more effort, but rather demands more clarity around the
objectives, questions, decisions, roles, responsibilities and deliverables of the
monitoring program. Improved clarity will ensure a greater likelihood of achieving
conservation outcomes. Importantly, responsibility lies with scientists,
practitioners and managers to continue to promote and demonstrate the
importance and multiple values of monitoring programs for threatened species.
Robust monitoring will not prevent species extinctions; however, when
conservation actions and decisions are underpinned by accurate and timely
information, monitoring can lead to informed management and enhanced
conservation of threatened biodiversity.


References

Addison PFE, Cook CN, de Bie K (2016) Conservation practitioners’ perspectives on
decision triggers for evidence-based management. Journal of Applied Ecology 53 ,
1351–1357. doi:10.1111/1365 -266 4.12734
Block WM, Franklin AB, Ward JP, Ganey JL, White GC (2001) Design and implemen-
tation of monitoring studies to evaluate the success of ecological restoration on
wildlife. Restoration Ecology 9 , 293–303. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003293.x
Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA,
et al. (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328 , 116 4 –



  1. doi:10.1126/science.1187512
    Caughlan L, Oakley KL (2001) Cost considerations for long-term ecological monitor-
    ing. Ecological Indicators 1 , 123–134. doi:10.1016/S1470-160X(01)00015-2
    Clarke RH, Oliver DL, Boulton RL, Cassey P, Clarke MF (2003) Assessing programs
    for monitoring threatened species – a tale of three honeyeaters (Meliphagidae).
    Wildlife Research 30 , 427–435. doi:10.1071/WR02056
    Cook CN, de Bie K, Keith DA, Addison PFE (2016) Decision triggers are a critical part
    of evidence-based conservation. Biological Conservation 195 , 46–51. doi:10.1016/j.
    biocon.2015.12.024
    Ens EJ, Pert P, Clarke PA, Budden M, Clubb L, Doran B, et al. (2015) Indigenous
    biocultural knowledge in ecosystem science and management: review and insight
    from Australia. Biological Conservation 181 , 133–149. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.
    11.0 08
    Environment and Communications References Committee (2013) Effectiveness of
    Threatened Species and Ecological Communities’ Protection in Australia. Common-
    wealth of Australia, Canberra.
    Field SA, Tyre AJ, Possingham HP (2005) Optimizing allocation of monitoring effort
    under economic and observational constraints. The Journal of Wildlife Manage-
    ment 69 , 473–482. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0473:OAOMEU]2.0.CO;2

Free download pdf