30 Europe The Economist April 30th 2022
W
henrussiainvadedUkraineon
February24th,someformerEuro
peanheadsofgovernmenthurriedto
erasetheirpersonalbusinesslinkstothe
country.EskoAho,ChristianKernand
MatteoRenzi—onetimeleadersofFin
land,AustriaandItalyrespectively—quit
prominentrolesontheboardsofbig
Russianfirms.NotsoGerhardSchröder.
Germany’sformerchancellorhasre
tainedhisseatasheadofthesupervisory
boardofRosneft,a Russianoilgiant.He
isnominatedtojointheboardofGaz
prom,thestatecontrolledgasexporter.
Since 2016 hehasbeenchairmanofNord
Stream2,an$11bngaspipelinethat
wouldhavedoubledtheunderseaflowof
gasbetweenRussiaandGermany(Olaf
Scholz,thecurrentchancellor,pulledthe
plugonit inFebruary).
Whyhastheoncerespectedleader
stayedsoclosetoRussia?MrSchröder,a
politicianfromtheSocialDemocratic
Party(spd), achievedmuchforhiscoun
try.A packageofreformsimplementedin
theearly2000stransformedGermany
from“thesickmanofEurope”into
itseconomicengine.Hewasalsoa vocal
advocateofOstpolitik, a longstanding
policyofrapprochementwiththeeast
ernblocdatingbacktotheSovietUnion.
Oneelementoftheidea,whichsurvived
thereunificationofGermanyin1990,
wastobindRussiainanenergypartner
shipofmutualdependencewithEurope.
ForyearsGermanleadersacrossthe
spectrumbelievedinWandeldurchHan-
del,orpoliticalchangethroughtrade.
ManyGermanRusslandversteher(“Russia
understanders”)recantedafterRussia
annexedCrimeain2014—oratthevery
leastafterthisyear’sattackonUkraine.
MrSchröderhasnot.
Thehighlivingchancellor’senduring
linkstoRussiaareaboutmorethan
stubbornadherencetoa flawedideology.
MrSchröderhasearnedmillionsfrom
hiscorporatepositions.Hehasalso
forgeda closefriendshipwithVladimir
Putin,Russia’sGermanspeakingpresi
dent.ThepaircelebratedMrSchröder’s
60thand70thbirthdays,inHanoverand
StPetersburgrespectively.
MrSchrödercouldhavebeenremem
beredasoneofthegreatchancellors.As
it is,hewillbeknownasMrPutin’s
lobbyist.SaskiaEsken,thespd’s co
leader,hascalledforhimtoquitthe
party,whichhasbeguntheslowprocess
ofrevokinghismembership.Heresigned
hishonorarycitizenshipofHanover,his
hometown,beforethecitycouldstrip
himofit.TheofficialspdshopinBerlin
hasevenwithdrawnitsredGerhard
Schrödercoffeemugfromsale.Noneof
thishasprickedMrSchröder’scon
science.Assumingthathehasone.
GerhardSchröder
From chancellor to chancer
B ERLIN
WhyGermany’sformerleaderwon’tunfriendVladimirPutin
Forsale
Turkey
“Judicial
assassination”
O
verthecourseofthewarinUkraine,
Turkey’s government has earned some
goodwill in the West by publicly opposing
Russia’s invasion and by providing Uk
raine with armed drones. On April 25th a
lot of that goodwill went up in smoke,
when a court in Istanbul handed Osman
Kavala, one of Turkey's most respected
civilsociety activists, a life sentence for
“attempting to overthrow” the country’s
government during protests almost a de
cade ago. Seven other defendants, accused
of aiding Mr Kavala, were sentenced to 18
years each.
Two of those people, Can Atalay, a law
yer, and Mucella Yapici, an architect, stood
inside the courtroom facing a crowd of
shocked onlookers, some of them wiping
away tears, moments after hearing the ver
dict. “They will now take us to Silivri,” Mr
Atalay shouted, referring to a notorious
prison on the outskirts of Istanbul. “But
know that we will not bow to tyranny.” In
his closing statement, Mr Kavala, speaking
by video link, called the case a “judicial as
sassination”.
Even by the standards of Turkey’s judi
ciary, which tends to do the government’s
bidding, the prosecution of Mr Kavala has
been a farce. The evidence against him
should have been laughed out of court. The
prosecution depended not only on unsub
stantiated speculation but also on a wilful
blurring of protest with treacherous insur
rection. Mr Kavala was first arrested in late
2017 for his involvement in the Gezi Park
protests which had engulfed the country in
2013. He maintained that he had supported
the protests (and attended them), but had
no role in organising them, much less in
trying to overthrow the government. De
spite the authorities’ efforts to depict his
gift of some pastries to the protesters as
proof of his treasonous intentions, he was
acquitted in 2020. But he was rearrested
hours later on separate but equally pre
posterous charges related to a violent coup
attempt against Turkey’s president, Recep
Tayyip Erdogan, in 2016. An appeals court
then overturned the acquittals in the Gezi
Park case, paving the way for the retrial that
has just concluded.
When the European Court of Human
Rights (echr) ordered Mr Kavala’s release,
Turkey’s government refused to comply
even though its membership of the Coun
cil of Europe requires it to do so. When the
American ambassador to Turkey and nine
of his European colleagues urged the gov
ernment to abide by the echrruling, Mr
Erdogan ordered them out of the country,
though he later relented.
The verdict will damage relations be
tween Turkey and its Western allies fur
ther. America’s response to the ruling, a
statement calling Mr Kavala’s conviction
“unjust” and an example of “judicial ha
rassment of civil society”, was even more
harshly phrased than the one that almost
got its envoy kicked out last year. euoffi
cials have also condemned the decision.
The verdict may be a preview of things
to come. The case against Mr Kavala and
his colleagues has less to do with the
events of 2013 than with those of 2023,
when Turkey will hold presidential and
parliamentary elections. These are likely
to be the toughest of Mr Erdogan’s career.
Turkey’s strongman now trails his rivals in
the polls, largely as a result of his eccentric
economic policies, which have burdened
Turkey with an inflation rate of over 60%
and a collapsing lira. Rather than attempt
ing to fix the economy,it very much looks
as though Mr Erdoganhas decided to step
up his repression.n
I STANBUL
A Turkish court sentences an activist
to life in prison