The Economist April 30th 2022 China 51
Pensions
Pillar talk
“A
stonishing”, “spectacular”, “un
precedented”: Chinahaswonplau
ditsfromtheWorldBankandotherexperts
fortherapidexpansionofitsbasicstate
pensionsoverthepastdozenyears.The
number enrolled in these schemes (in
cludingoneforurbanemployees)crossed
1bnin2021.Butthespeedyconstructionof
thisfirst“pillar”ofChina’spensionsystem
has notbeenmatched elsewherein the
plannededifice.
Asecondpillarissupposedtoreston
firms, which can enrollemployeesin a
company pension. But fewer than 29m
people,lessthan10%oftheeligiblework
force,hadsignedupforthese“enterprise
annuities”bytheendoflastyear.China’s
third pillar—personal pensions—is even
stumpier.AlthoughindividualsinChina
savea lot,buyinghomesandotherassets,
theyhavelittlereason(orinclination)to
setuppersonalpensions.Togivethema
nudge,China’sgovernmentlaunchedpilot
schemesinShanghai,Fujianandpartof
Suzhoubackin2018.Theseschemesof
feredmodesttaxbreakstopeoplewilling
tolockuptheirmoneyinpensionproducts
offeredbyapprovedfinancialinstitutions.
But takeup was disappointing and the
thirdpillarhasmadelittleprogresssince.
Thedelayisa pity,becauseChinaisnot
gettinganyyounger.Bytheendofthisde
cade,itwillhavemorepeopleaged 60 or
abovethanAmericawillhavepeople.Ma
nyoftheseoldfolkfacea precariousretire
ment,balancedonlyonthefirstpillar.And
timeisalsorunningoutforChina’syoun
ger cohorts.Welldesigned pension pro
ductsworkbestwhenpeoplestartcontrib
utingintheir20s,allowingthemtomake
highrisk, highreturn investments they
shouldavoidlaterinlife.ButChina’spopu
lation of 20somethings peaked in the
1990sandhasshrunkbyalmost50minthe
pasttenyears.
TheurgencyisnotentirelylostonChi
na’sleaders.OnApril21sttheStateCouncil,
China’scabinet,releasedasetofguide
lines on private personal pensions, in
structingministriestolaunchmorepilot
projects, then roll out schemes nation
wide.“Thereisnotmuchmeatonit,”says
NicholasOmondiofZBen,a financialcon
sultancyinShanghai.Buttheannounce
ment nonetheless sendsa “strongmes
sage”toChina’srivalrousregulators“toget
theiracttogetherandgetthisdone”.
Ifpersonalpensionsdotakeoff,they
couldhavesalutaryeffectsonChina’sin
vestmenthabitsandfinancialmarkets.At
themoment,citydwellerskeeptwothirds
oftheirwealthinhousing,accordingtoa
surveyin 2019 bySouthwesternUniversity
ofFinanceandEconomics.Toomuchof
therestiseitherinbarrencashor“rolling
fromoneendofthestockmarkettoanoth
er”,asMrOmondiputsit,“withoutmuch
ofa fundamentalanchor”.InChina“saving
isnota problem”,saysYothinJinjarakof
theAsianDevelopmentBank.“Butwhere
thesavingsgo,that’sthequestion.”
Wellrunpensionfunds,witha longer
termhorizon,couldcontributetoa better
allocationofcapitalinChina.That,inturn,
wouldmakefutureworkersmoreproduc
tive—whichtheywillneedtobeiftheyare
totakecareofthemselves,theirchildren
andtheirelderlyparentscomfortably.
ButevenifChina’sauthoritiesspeedily
approvethesebetterfinancialmousetraps,
willcustomersbeata pathtothem?Thetax
breaksonofferarenotwildlytempting.
Peoplecandeductcontributionsofupto
12,000yuan($1,800)a yearfromtheirtax
ableincome,accordingtotheguidelines.
Thatisabouta quarterofaveragedisposa
bleincomeinurbanChina.Butitisonly
15%ina placelikeShanghai.Thatwillseem
meagretothecity’shigherearners.Andif
funds keep a tightlid on risk, as they
shouldinacontributor’slateryears, re
turnsmaynotlookenticingtoChinesein
vestors,saysJanetLiofMercer,a consul
tancy,giventhatpeopledislikelockingup
theirmoneyfordecades.
Thus,beforeChinesehouseholdswill
investenthusiasticallyinthethirdpillar,
thegovernmentandindustrywillhaveto
investineducatingthem.Asanexampleof
whatisrequired,MsLicitestheanimated
videos prepared by the Insurance Asset
ManagementAssociationofChina.Inone,
a mansitsbehinda deskimaginingallof
his expenses—mortgage, children, car—
andotherburdens,suchaselderlycare.
Eventhinkingaboutitturnshishairgrey.
Themessageisclear:ifyoufailtoprepare
forit,ageingwillageyou.n
H ONGKONG
Chinawillrolloutprivate,personal
pensions.Abouttime
How to save it
China, pension assets, by scheme, 2020
Yuan trn
Source:MinistryofHumanResources
andSocialSecurity,CICCResearch
Thirdpillar
Individuals
Secondpillar
Companies
Firstpillar
State
0 2 4 6
Commercial
annuity insurance
Enterprise annuity
Basic resident pension
Urban employees
That Works”—the title of an official white
paper from December.
That notion is being challenged in
Shanghai, where millions of frustrated
people have been locked down for weeks,
some lacking food or medicine, in an effort
to suppress a covid19 outbreak. The traf
ficked women pose a different sort of test
for the system: whether it is able to pro
duce legal and legislative reforms in the
face of a public outcry. Officials claim it is
passing. A deeper look suggests it is not.
The npcis at the heart of China’s demo
cratic claims. The biggest parliament in the
world, with nearly 3,000 members, caps a
pyramid of lower congresses. They guaran
tee “the people’s status as masters of the
country”, says the white paper. Yet only the
bottom level is directly elected. npcmem
bers are chosen, in effect, by the Commu
nist Party. Their suggestions, such as in
creasing sentences for trafficking, are rare
ly debated and often ignored by the gov
ernment. The body’s full session ended in
March with no changes to trafficking laws.
The party dictates the direction of the
legislature. Officials may get angry when
the npc is called a “rubber stamp”, but
members do tend to pass everything put in
front of them. One of the biggest shows of
opposition was in 2012, when only 92.4%
supported an amendment to the criminal
procedure law. This year members took the
bold step of commending Xi Jinping, Chi
na’s supreme leader, for “doing a great job
at being in charge”. When one took to so
cial media to call for more flexibility in
Shanghai’s covid response, his comments
were censored.
The npc’s standing committee, which
met in April, is often more active. For ex
ample, when dud vaccines were injected
into thousands of children in 2018, the
committee pushed through reforms in a
matter of months—but only after Mr Xi got
involved. He has not commented publicly
on the trafficking cases. The committee re
cently suggested some additions to a pre
existing law protecting women. These
would merely require local authorities to
“promptly report” suspected trafficking
cases to the police.
The party may ultimately decide to
make the criminal code tougher. It gets a
facelift every four years on average, says
Changhao Wei of Yale Law School. But re
formists once had high hopes that the npc
would actually make China more demo
cratic. The constitution, after all, guaran
tees free speech and an elected parliament.
A notable event occurred in 2003, when ac
tivists pushed the npcto act after the po
lice beat a migrant worker to death. The
regulations under which the victim was
detained were ultimately repealed—but
not by the parliament. The government did
it directly. Allowing the npctodoitwould
have set a dangerous precedent.n