LAB REPORT
32 Australian Hi-Fi
ON TEST
http://www.aushifi.com
on this album, the other seven are all jazz
standards—albeit really only ‘standards’ if
you have jazz credentials) where Rollinson’s
distinctive guitar playing reminded me a bit
of Steve Bryant’s, but from a listening point
of view, it was the joy of hearing the octaves
and fifths delivered pitch-perfect by the
Revels, along with the crisp dynamism of the
guitar sound. You’ll love the trio’s take on
Blind Willie Nelson’s Dark was the Night, Cold
was the Ground... coincidentally yet another
song title I wish I’d thought of!
Could the Revel Performa F228Be speakers
be improved? I was totally happy with their
sound quality, but I would have really liked it
if Revel had included on the F228Be the ‘Low
Frequency Compensation’ switch from the
F-208 that can be used to reduce the speakers’
bass response when they’re operated close to
a boundary. OK, so my room is large enough
that I didn’t have to have the speakers close
to any boundary, but that may not be true for
all potential buyers. I would also have liked it
if Revel had included the ‘Tweeter Level’ con-
trol from the F-208 that allows you to adjust
tweeter level over a 2dB range in five incre-
ments... not because I wasn’t happy with the
high-frequency balance of the F228Bes, but
because it would have helped in situations
which required a less than ideal position for
the speakers in the listening room. Maybe
Revel figures that if you can afford a pair of
F228Bes you’ll be putting them in a room
that’s large enough that you won’t need to
make any adjustments.
ConClusion
Since it seemed inevitable that readers will
compare the almost-identically-sized and
almost identical-looking F-208 with this new
F228Be design I thought I should address
the elephant in the room in my conclusion,
which is that despite the similarities, and
the fact that the two models have the same
number of drivers, and those drivers are iden-
tically-sized, Revel says the two models share
no component parts... that the F228Be is a
completely new design that uses materials
that were not available when the F-208 was
designed almost six years ago.
But does this mean that Revel F228Be is
a better speaker than the Revel F-208? The
simple answer is that yes, I do think the Revel
F228Be is a ‘better’ speaker than the Revel
F-208. But I say that not because it is a newer
speaker, and most certainly not because it’s a
more expensive speaker, but because I think
the Revel F228Be sounds a bit more natural
across the midrange, images a tad more real-
istically, has somewhat superior bass, slightly
more uniform directivity and a rather more
extended high-frequency response.
contactdetails
Brand: Revel
Model: F228Be
RRP: $18,995.perpair
Warranty: FiveYears
Distributor: ConvoyInternationalPtyLtd
Address: Unit2, 314 HorsleyRoad
MilperraNSW 2214
T: (02) 97749900
E: [email protected]
W: http://www.convoy.com.au
- Superbsound
- Excellentdispersion
- Greatlooks!
- Lowimpedance
- Whitedrivers
- Nouseradjustments
Theonlybadnewsis theaskingprice,which
is nearlytwicetherecommendedretailprice
oftheRevelF-208.
Butontheflipside,thegoodnewsis that
if youcan’taffordtheRevelPerformaF228Be,
there’salwaystheRevelF-208. Sam Riggs
to 30Hz, so the –3dB point is essentially
at 30Hz.
A detailed plot of the Revel F228Be’s
high-frequency response is shown in
Graph 2, with the detail enabled by New-
port Test Lab’s use of a different measure-
ment technique, one that is effectively
the response the speaker would deliver
in an anechoic chamber. It shows the
response both with the loudspeaker grille
in place, and without it, and you can see
that the flatter, more-extended response is
delivered without the grille being present
(black trace), such that without the grille
the high-frequency response is 3dB down
at 23kHz, whereas with the grille fitted it
rolls off a little sooner, to be 3dB down
at 17kHz, though it stays 3dB down right
out to 21kHz. You can see that both traces
continue to roll off until 30kHz, after
which they rise to the tweeter’s resonant
peak at 37kHz... a peak that’s suitably
well-damped. As the trace tracks up to this
peak you can see a very tiny resonance at
around 32kHz.
The low-frequency performance of
the Revel F228Be is shown in Graph 3,
with the lab this time using a nearfield
measurement technique that simulates
the result the speaker would deliver in an
anechoic chamber. You can see that it’s
the front-firing port that delivers most
of the output at frequencies below 45Hz,
as the low-frequency output of the twin
bass drivers begins rolling off at 60Hz. The
acoustic outputs of the bass and midrange
drivers are both 6dB down at around
230Hz, a bit lower than the electrical
crossover point of 260Hz. You can see the
output of the midrange driver (blue trace)
is exceptionally flat and extended indeed.
Remember when looking at this graph
that you’re looking at ‘raw’ SPL levels—
the lab has not post-processed the data to
adjust for the differences in the diameters
of the sound sources.
The impedance modulus of the Revel
F228Be suggests that it should nominally
be rated as being a 4Ω system, and indeed
it should be rated as such according to
IEC 60268-5 (16.1). You can see that not
only does the impedance remain below
8Ω from 20Hz right out to 800Hz, but
it also drops to around 3.4Ω between
80Hz and 100Hz, and to 3.5Ω at around
280Hz. There’s also a bit of a challenge for
amplifiers just below 400Hz, where the
impedance is just 5Ω and the phase angle
(light blue trace) is around +40°... a pretty
challenging load. Revel should either not
be specifying the Revel F228Be with a
nominal impedance of 8Ω or specifying
lABoRAToRy
TEsT
REPoRT
Readers interested in a full technical appraisal of
the performance of the Revel F228Be Loudspeakers
should continue on and read the LABORATORY
REPORT published on the following pages. Readers
should note that the results mentioned in the report,
tabulated in performance charts and/or displayed us-
ing graphs and/or photographs should be construed
as applying only to the specific sample tested.
Newport Test Labs measured the overall fre-
quency response of the Revel F228Be as being
30Hz to 22kHz ±3dB, which is an excellent
result, even though it’s not quite the 27Hz to
44kHz –6dB that is claimed by Revel in its spec-
ifications.
Graph 1 shows the room response of the
Revel F228Be, as measured by Newport Test
Labs using pink noise as a test stimulus, where
the graph shown is the averaged result of nine
measurements made in a grid with the centre
of the grid on-axis with the tweeter. As you
can see for yourself, the response is very flat,
so that between 80Hz and 8kHz the response is
within ±1.25dB. The low-frequency response is
3dB down at 45Hz, but stays at this level down