Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Methods and Protocols

(sharon) #1

92


Response to treatment.
Other pathologies.
SURGICAL MARGINS
Distance of carcinoma to:
Proximal margin.
Distal margin.
Circumferential margin.
LYMPH NODE STATUS
Number recovered and number involved by carcinoma.
ANCILLARY TESTS: Immunohistochemistry: HER2 status.

References



  1. Mapstone NP (2007) Dataset for the histo-
    pathological reporting of esophageal carci-
    noma. The Royal College of Pathologists,
    London

  2. Lester S (2010) Manual of surgical pathology.
    Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia

  3. Ibrahim N (2000) Guidelines for handling
    esophageal biopsies and resection specimens
    and their reporting. J Clin Pathol 53:89–94

  4. Kumarasinghe MP, Brown IS, Charlton A,
    De Boer B, Eckstein R, Epari K, Gill A, Lam
    A, Lauwers G, Raftopoulos S, Price T (2013)
    Tumours of the esophagus and gastro-esoph-
    ageal junction structured reported protocol,
    1st edn, Published on web by Royal College
    of Pathologists of Australasia. http://www.
    rcpa.edu.au//Library/Practising-Pathology/
    Structured-Pathology-Reporting-of-Cancer/
    Cancer-Protocols

  5. Lagarde S, ten Kate F, Reitsma J, Busch O, van
    Lanschot J (2006) Prognostic factors in adeno-
    carcinoma of the esophagus or gastresophageal
    junction. J Clin Oncol 24:4347–4355

  6. Griffiths E, Brummell Z, Gorthi G, Pritchard
    S, Welch I (2006) Tumor length as a prognos-
    tic factor in esophageal malignancy: univariate
    and multivariate survival analyses. J Surg Oncol
    93:258–267

  7. Eloubeidi M, Desmond R, Arguedas M, Reed
    C, Wilcox C (2009) Prognostic factors for the
    survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma
    in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length
    and lymph node status. Cancer 95:1434–1443

  8. Deeter M, Dorer R, Kuppusamy M, Koehler
    R, Low D (2009) Assessment of criteria and
    clinical significance of circumferential resec-
    tion margins in esophageal cancer. Arch Surg
    144:618–624
    9. Dexter S, Sue-Ling H, MCMahan M, Quirke P,
    Mapstone N, Martin I (2001) Circumferential
    resection margin involvement: an indepen-
    dent predictor of survival following surgery for
    esophageal cancer. Gut 48:667–670
    10. Chang F, Deere H, Mahadeva U, George
    S (2008) Histopathologic examination and
    reporting of esophageal carcinomas following
    preoperative neoadjuvant therapy: practical
    guidelines and current issues. Am J Clin Pathol
    129:252–262
    11. Aida J, Vieth M, Ell C, May A, Pech O,
    Hoshihara Y, Kumagai Y, Kawada K, Hishima
    T, Taitishi Y, Sawabe M, Arai T, Matsuura M,
    Takubo K (2011) Palisade vessels as a new
    histologic marker of esophageal origin in ER
    specimens from columnar-lined esophagus.
    Am J Surg Pathol 35:1140–1145
    12. Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd D, Brookland
    R, Washington M, Gershenwald J, Compton
    C, Hess K, Sullivan D, Jessup J, Brierley J,
    Gaspar L, Schilsky R, Balch C, Winchester D,
    Asare E, Madera M, Gress D, Meyer L (eds)
    (2017) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn.
    Springer, New York
    13. Allanson BM, Bonavita J, Mirzai B, Khor
    T, Raftopoulos S, de Boer WB, Brown IS,
    Kumarasinghe MP (2017) Early Barrett esoph-
    agus-related neoplasia in segments 1cm or
    longer is always associated with intestinal meta-
    plasia. Mod Pathol 30:1170–1176
    14. Rice T, Rusch V, Ishwaran H, Blackstone E
    (2010) Cancer of the esophagus and esopha-
    gogastric junction. Data-driven staging for
    the seventh edition of the American Joint
    Committee on Cancer/International Union
    Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals.
    Cancer 116:3763–3773


Benjamin M. Allanson and M. Priyanthi Kumarasinghe
Free download pdf