Chapter 3 ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
E. Hemodynamic disturbances
- Hemodynamic assessment
Class I
1 Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring should be
performed for the following:
a. Progressive hypotension, when unresponsive
to fl uid administration or when fl uid administra-
tion may be contraindicated. (Level of Evidence:
C)
b. Suspected mechanical complications of
STEMI, (i.e., VSR, papillary muscle rupture, or
free wall rupture with pericardial tamponade) if
an echocardiogram has not been performed.
(Level of Evidence: C)
2 Intra-arterial pressure monitoring should be per-
formed for the following:
a. Patients with severe hypotension (systolic arte-
rial pressure less than 80 mm Hg). (Level of Evi-
dence: C)
b. Patients receiving vasopressor/inotropic
agents. (Level of Evidence: C)
c. Cardiogenic shock. (Level of Evidence: C)
Class IIa
1 Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring can be
useful for the following:
a. Hypotension in a patient without pulmonary
congestion who has not responded to an initial
trial of fl uid administration. (Level of Evidence:
C)
b. Cardiogenic shock. (Level of Evidence: C)
c. Severe or progressive CHF or pulmonary
edema that does not respond rapidly to therapy.
(Level of Evidence: C)
d. Persistent signs of hypoperfusion without
hypotension or pulmonary congestion. (Level of
Evidence: C)
e. Patients receiving vasopressor/inotropic
agents. (Level of Evidence: C)
2 Intra-arterial pressure monitoring can be useful
for patients receiving intravenous sodium nitro-
prusside or other potent vasodilators. (Level of Evi-
dence: C)
Class IIb
Intra-arterial pressure monitoring might be consid-
ered in patients receiving intravenous inotropic
agents. (Level of Evidence: C)
Class III
1 Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring is not rec-
ommended in patients with STEMI without evi-
dence of hemodynamic instability or respiratory
compromise. (Level of Evidence: C)
2 Intra-arterial pressure monitoring is not recom-
mended for patients with STEMI who have no pul-
monary congestion and have adequate tissue
perfusion without use of circulatory support mea-
sures. (Level of Evidence: C)
- Hypotension
Class I
1 Rapid volume loading with an IV infusion
should be administered to patients without clinical
evidence for volume overload. (Level of Evidence:
C)
2 Rhythm disturbances or conduction abnormali-
ties causing hypotension should be corrected. (Level
of Evidence: C)
3 Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation should be
performed in patients who do not respond to other
interventions, unless further support is futile because
of the patient’s wishes or contraindications/unsuit-
ability for further invasive care. (Level of Evidence:
B)
4 Vasopressor support should be given for hypo-
tension that does not resolve after volume loading.
(Level of Evidence: C)
5 Echocardiography should be used to evaluate
mechanical complications unless these are assessed
by invasive measures. (Level of Evidence: C) - Low-output state
Class I
1 LV function and potential presence of a mechani-
cal complication should be assessed by echocardiog-
raphy if these have not been evaluated by invasive
measures. (Level of Evidence: C)
2 Recommended treatments for low-output states
include:
a. Inotropic support. (Level of Evidence: B)
b. Intra-aortic counterpulsation. (Level of Evi-
dence: B)
c. Mechanical reperfusion with PCI or CABG.
(Level of Evidence: B)
d. Surgical correction of mechanical complica-
tions. (Level of Evidence: B)