Evolution, 4th Edition

(Amelia) #1

  1. The ratites are a very old clade of flightless birds
    that include the ostriches in Africa, rheas in South
    America, emu and cassowaries in Australia, and
    kiwis and recently extinguished moas in new
    Zealand. South American tinamous, which are
    capable of flight, are closely related to the rat-
    ites. The “Gondwanan distribution” of these
    birds has often been attributed to vicariance, but
    some researchers have questioned this phylog-
    eny and distributional history. Read several phy-
    logenetic studies of the ratites and discuss how
    best to explain their distribution: A. Cooper et
    al., 2001, Nature 409: 704–707; o. Haddrath and
    A. J. Baker, 2001, Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B 268:
    939–945; S. J. Hackett et al., 2008, Science 320:
    1763–1768; and A. J. Baker et al., 2014, Mol. Biol.
    Evol 31: 1686–1696.

  2. in Chapters 4 and 6 you saw that many charac-
    teristics of most species have the genetic varia-
    tion that is required for those characteristics
    to evolve, and that many examples of rapid
    adaptation to human-altered environments
    have been documented. Discuss whether or
    not this observation is inconsistent with the fact
    that many organisms display phylogenetic niche
    conservatism.

  3. in some cases, it can be shown that species are
    physiologically incapable of surviving tempera-
    tures that prevail beyond the borders of their
    range. Do such observations prove that cold


regions have low species diversity because of
their harsh physical conditions?


  1. By far the most effective way of saving endan-
    gered species is to preserve large areas that
    include their habitat. for social, political, and
    economic reasons, the number and distribution
    of areas that can be allocated as preserves are
    highly limited. it might be easier to save more
    species if areas of endemism were correlated
    among different taxa, such as plants, birds, and
    mammals. Are they correlated? (See, for exam-
    ple, n. Myers et al., 2000, Nature 403: 853–858;
    J. R. Prendergast et al., 1993, Nature 365: 335–
    337; and A. P. Dobson et al., 1993, Science 275:
    550–553.)

  2. Would you expect large numbers of species
    in a region to have had similar histories of geo-
    graphic distribution? Why or why not? How
    could you use phylogeographic analyses, such
    as illustrated in figure 18.14, to address this
    question?

  3. in what ways have human activities influenced
    the biogeographic distribution of animals? How
    have humans caused animal ranges to expand or
    contract?


18_EVOL4E_CH18.indd 488 3/22/17 1:39 PM

Free download pdf