Patient_Reported_Outcome_Measures_in_Rheumatic_Diseases

(ff) #1

18



  1. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis.
    Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23:137–45.

  2. Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, Revicki DA, Moher D, Brundage MD. Reporting of patient-
    reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA. 2013;
    309:814–22.

  3. Kalyoncu U, Dougados M, Daures J-P, Gossec L. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in
    recent trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis.
    2009;68:183–90.

  4. Schumacher HR, Taylor W, Edwards L, Grainger R, Schlesinger N, Dalbeth N, et al. Outcome
    domains for studies of acute and chronic gout. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:2342–5.

  5. Boers M, Brooks P, Strand CV, Tugwell P. The OMERACT filter for outcome measures in
    rheumatology. J Rheumatol. 1998;25:198–9.

  6. Goossens ME, Rutten-van Mölken MP, Vlaeyen JW, van der Linden SM. The cost diary: a
    method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost-effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol.
    2000;53:688–95.

  7. Braakman-Jansen LMA, Taal E, Kuper IH, van de Laar MAFJ. Productivity loss due to absen-
    teeism and presenteeism by different instruments in patients with RA and subjects without
    RA. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51:354–61.

  8. Basch E, Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Clauser SB, Minasian LM, Dueck AC, et al. Development
    of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminol-
    ogy criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;29:106(9).

  9. Pincus T, Yazici Y, Sokka T. Quantitative measures of rheumatic diseases for clinical research
    versus standard clinical care: differences, advantages and limitations. Best Pract Res Clin
    Rheumatol. 2007;21:601–28.

  10. Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and
    why? Qual Life Res. 2009;18:115–23.

  11. Hilarius D. Patient-reported outcomes in daily clinical oncology practice: a tool for patient
    monitoring and quality of care assessment. FMG: Psychology Research Institute. 2011. http://
    dare.uva.nl/document/2/91414.

  12. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K. The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in
    routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review.
    J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5:401–16.

  13. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The patient health questionnaire-2: validity of a two-
    item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41:1284–92.

  14. Ahmed S, Berzon RA, Revicki DA, Lenderking WR, Moinpour CM, Basch E, et al. The use
    of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications
    for clinical practice and health care policy. Med Care. 2012;50:1060–70.

  15. Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, Guyatt G, Ferrans CE, Halyard MY, et al. The
    impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the
    literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:179–93.

  16. Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SA, Wallston KA, Hummon NP. Assessment of patient satisfac-
    tion in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford health assessment questionnaire.
    Arthritis Rheum. 1983;26:1346–53.

  17. Porter M, Teisberg EO. Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results.
    Boston: Harvard Business Review Press; 2006.

  18. DeVellis R. Scale development: theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage; 2012.

  19. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al. Studies com-
    paring numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment
    of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41:
    1073–93.

  20. Bollen K, Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective.
    Psychol Bull. 1991;110(2):305–14.

  21. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to
    defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activ-
    ity index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:2286–91.


M.A.H.O. Voshaar and M.A.F.J. van de Laar
Free download pdf