386
- Luckmann R, Vidal A. Design of a handheld electronic pain, treatment and activity diary.
J Biomed Inform. 2010;43:S32. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.05.005. - Torous J, Staples P, Shanahan M, Lin C, Peck P, Keshavan M, et al. Utilizing a Personal
Smartphone Custom App to assess the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depressive
symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder. JMIR Mental Health. 2015;2:e8.
doi: 10.2196/mental.3889. - Hufford MR, Shields AL. Electronic diaries: applications and what works in the fi eld. Appl
Clin Trials. 2002;11(4):46–59. - Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR. Patient non-compliance
with paper diaries. BMJ. 2002;324:1193–4. - Gvozdenović E, Koevoets R, Wolterbeek R, van der Heijde D, Huizinga TW, Allaart CF,
et al. Assessment of global disease activity in RA patients monitored in the METEOR data-
base: the patient‘s versus the rheumatologist‘s opinion. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:461–6.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2390-4. - Koevoets R, de Glas NA, Le Bourlout C, Huizinga TW, Allaart CF, Dougados M, et al.
Autonomous online health assessment questionnaire registry in daily clinical practice.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52:883–7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes389. - Richter J, Muth T, Becker A, Koch T, Schneider M. Online data aquisition of medical out-
come Studies Short Form (SF36) in female Systemic Lupus Erythematodes (SLE) patients.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68 (Suppl 3):356. - Richter J, Muth T, Becker A, Koch T, Schneider M. Is online data aquisition of medical out-
come studies Short Form (SF36) feasible in female patients with Rheumatois Arthritis (RA)
and delivering equivalent data compared to paper-based data acquisition? Ann Rheum Dis.
2010;69(Suppl3):650. - Walter MJ, Mohd Din SH, Hazes JM, Lesaffre E, Barendregt PJ, Luime JJ. Is tightly con-
trolled disease activity possible with online patient-reported outcomes? J Rheumatol.
2014;41:640–7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130174. - Kleinman L, Leidy NK, Crawley J, Bonomy A, Schoenfeld P. A comparative trial of paper-
and- pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Refl ux and Dyspepsia
(QOLRAD) questionnaire. Med Care. 2001;39:181–9. - Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D, et al. Automated collection
of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires.
J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:998–1007. - Kvien TK. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1480–4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.030437. - Thumboo J, Wee H, Cheung Y, Machin D, Luo N, Feeny D, et al. Computerized administra-
tion of health-related quality of life instruments compared to interviewer administration may
reduce sample size requirements in clinical research: a pilot randomized controlled trial
among rheumatology patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25:577–83. - Schefte DB, Hetland ML. An open-source, self-explanatory touch screen in routine care.
Validity of fi lling in the Bath measures on Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index,
Function Index, the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scales in com-
parison with paper versions. Rheumatology. 2009;49:99–104. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/
kep333. - Newman ED, Lerch V, Jones JB, Stewart W. Touchscreen questionnaire patient data collec-
tion in rheumatology practice: development of a highly successful system using process rede-
sign. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:589–96. doi: 10.1002/acr.21560. - Salaffi F, Gasparini S, Ciapetti A, Gutierrez M, Grassi W. Usability of an innovative and
interactive electronic system for collection of patient-reported data in axial spondyloarthritis:
comparison with the traditional paper-administered format. Rheumatology. 2013;52:2062–
70. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket276. - Haverman L, van Rossum MA, van Veenendaal M, van den Berg JM, Dolman KM, Swart J,
et al. Effectiveness of a web-based application to monitor health-related quality of life.
Pediatrics. 2013;131:e533. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0958.
J. Richter et al.