wallstreetjournaleurope_20170111_The_Wall_Street_Journal___Europe

(Steven Felgate) #1

B2| Wednesday, January 11, 2017 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.


INDEX TO BUSINESSES


These indexes cite notable references to most parent companies and businesspeople
in today’s edition. Articles on regional page inserts aren’t cited in these indexes.


A
Agricultural Bank of
China.........................B
Alphabet................B1,B
Ant Financial Services
Group.........................B
Areva...........................B
Ariad
Pharmaceuticals.......B
AT&T..........................B
B
BMW.........................B
Boeing.........................A
Broadcom....................B
C
China UnionPay...........B
Comcast.....................B
D
Daimler................B2,B
E
European CommissionB
Evercore Partners.....B
Exxon Mobil................A
F
Facebook......................B
Fiat.......................B2,B
Fiat Chrysler


Automobiles.............A
Ford Motor...........B1,B
G
General Motors...B4,B
Google.........................B
Greenhill....................B
H
Hanjin Shipping..........B
HealthPrize
Technologies...........B
I
International Business
Machines...................B
L
Lockheed Martin.........A
L'Oreal.........................B
M
Millennium
Pharmaceuticals.......B
Moelis........................B
N
National Oil.................B
Nycomed......................B
P
Paladin Energy............B
Paysa...........................B
Perrigo.........................B

Planet Labs.................B
Pricewaterhouse
Coopers.....................B
R
Related........................B
Rosneft.......................A
Royal Mail...................B
S
Salix PharmaceuticalsB
Sanpower....................B
Saxo Bank...................B
SkyBridge Capital.......B
Standard Chartered..B
T
Takeda
Pharmaceutical....B2,B
Tencent Holdings........B
Tesla Motors........B2,B
Toyota Motor............B
V
Valeant Pharmaceuticals
International.............B
Volkswagen.................A
W
Waymo........................B
Y
Yahoo................B3,B5,B
YPF..............................B

BUSINESS & FINANCE


New Competitors
Market capitalization of car or mobility companies

*Private companies; based on most recent valuation
Source: FactSet THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.

Alphabet
Toyota
Daimler
Volkswagen
Uber*
BMW
General Motors
Ford
Tesla
Lyft*

$543 billion
190
79
72
63
61
53
48
35
5.

INDEX TO PEOPLE


B-D
Balkrishnan, Rajesh..B
Brandt, Eric.................B
Chabot, Steve.............B
Chubak, Steven.........B
Conaway, Mike............B
Doty, James................B
Duffy, Sean.................B
E-G
Ellis, David..................B
Feehan, Townsend......B
Filo, David...................B
Getty, Jomode Elie.....B


H-K
Haftar, Khalifa............B
Hansen, Gaylen...........B
Hansen, Ole.................B
Hatchett, Jon..............B
Hensarling, Jeb...........B
Kehoe, James..............B
M
Macri, Mauricio...........B
Ma, Jack......................B
Maris, David................B
Massad, Timothy........B
Mayer, Marissa...........B

McInerney, Thomas....B
Mody, Raj....................B
P-S
Papa, Joseph...............B
Porter, Geoff...............B
Raffat, Umer...............B
Sanallah, Mustafa......B
Scaramucci, Anthony..B
T-Y
Towner, John...............B
Toyoda, Akio...............B
Weber, Christophe......B
Yamaguchi, Hidemaru B

But concerns are growing
that Australia is letting pri-
vate investors profit too much
from higher land and property
values generated by the new
transportation projects. Aus-
tralia lags behind places such
as Hong Kong, London and
Denver in the use of mecha-
nisms to ensure private real-
estate developers—not just
the public purse—help to pay
for infrastructure, critics say.
“We’re spending money, but
we’re losing value,” said Joe
Langley, a director in the in-
frastructure advisory unit of
engineering-services firm
AECOM Technology Corp. in
Sydney.


In London, where a new
train line known as Crossrail is
set to be completed in 2019,
authorities charge developers
and businesses various levies
to siphon off some of the rise
in land values. This concept,
called value capture, pays for
a third of the Crossrail project.
Developers in Australia
aren’t saddled with such costs.
In the suburb of Baulkham
Hills, about 30 kilometers
from central Sydney, land val-
ues jumped 82% in the four
years after the A$20 billion
Sydney Metro project was un-
veiled in 2011. Sydney Metro
aims to use rail links to con-
nect outer suburbs with the
central business district.
The price rise outpaced the
57% growth in residential-
property prices in the London
suburb of Shenfield, a similar
distance from the city center,
in the six years since Crossrail
got the go-ahead, real-estate
firm Knight Frank said.
Lawmakers have signaled a
need to change tack. The Aus-
tralian government said in No-
vember that the country is


Continuedfromthepriorpage


nearing the limits of financing
infrastructure projects entirely
with taxpayer money, and
value capture is a possible so-
lution.
Andrew Constance, the
transportation and infrastruc-
ture minister for the state of
New South Wales, Australia’s
most populous, said the gov-
ernment was exploring new
funding options, including
value capture.
Real-estate lobby groups
are preparing to push back.
Urban Taskforce Australia re-
cently said “value capture isn’t
a magic pudding that will fund
all infrastructure,” while the
Property Council of Australia
recently warned lawmakers
against introducing “new taxes
under the cloak of value cap-
ture.”
Some developers think they
can solve the public-funding
dilemma and benefit at the
same time. MTR Corp., which
operates the Hong Kong rail-
way and helped construct Lon-
don’s Crossrail, offers to build
new train lines with private
money in exchange for the
right to develop land near sta-
tions.
Property firms wishing to
build apartment or office tow-
ers would pay a land premium,
with proceeds flowing back
into the railway. MTR has
tested the model in Hong Kong
and Shenzhen.
Last year, Centurion Group
of Cos., representing state-
owned China Railway Engi-
neering Corp., proposed a sim-
ilar value-capture model to
pay for a new, high-speed
train line linking several towns
on Australia’s eastern coast.
Meanwhile, Consolidated
Land & Rail Australia, a con-
sortium backed by former U.S.
Secretary of Transportation
Ray LaHood, is working on a
proposal for a superfast train
between Sydney and Mel-
bourne.
Chairman Nick Cleary said
the project was driven by the
prospect of turning cow pad-
docks into prime property.
“This is a real-estate plan
as opposed to a railway plan,”
said Mr. Cleary, who added
that the consortium already
had secured 50% of the land
needed to build eight cities
along the train line.

BUILD


Some developers


think they can solve


the funding dilemma


and still benefit.


cal factions that the company
wouldn’t pay to reopen facili-
ties but argued instead they
would all lose out if oil reve-
nue didn’t increase soon, ac-
cording to NOC and Western
security officials.
Most militias still receive
wages from the government for
their role in the 2011 uprising
and for securing oil facilities.
Western governments, in-
cluding the U.S., also con-
tacted militia leaders to per-
suade them that it was in their
interest to let the oil flow, ac-
cording to the security offi-
cials.
Jomode Elie Getty, presi-
dent of the Toubou Revolu-
tionary Council, which repre-
sents one of the militias
abroad, said Western govern-
ments persuaded his group to
address its grievances with
Tripoli through legal means
instead of violence.

in recent months has helped
NOC’s bid to jump-start oil
production.
In September, the Libyan
National Army, a militia that
opposes the Tripoli govern-
ment, wrested control of the
oil ports and allowed them to
reopen. The army’s chief, Khal-
ifa Haftar, believed the re-
opening would give him politi-
cal legitimacy and allow him
access to oil revenue needed
to pay his fighters, people fa-
miliar with the matter said.
A spokesman for Gen. Haf-
tar didn’t respond to requests
for comment.
Another deal came together
last month when two militias
that controlled different sec-
tions of Libya’s biggest oil
field agreed to allow National
Oil to pump again.
In talks that spanned seven
months, NOC’s chairman, Mus-
tafa Sanallah, told local politi-

try’s annual export revenue.
“It’s the oil company as a
nation,” said Geoff Porter,
head of North Africa Risk Con-
sulting, who advises oil com-
panies active in the region.
“The real driving force behind
rebuilding Libya as a nation
state is the NOC.”
National Oil once was a tar-
get for militias that wanted to
either control its resources or
deprive rivals of oil revenue.
In 2014, oil storage tanks were
torched in Tripoli and in east-
ern terminals after warring
militias tried to seize control
of the facilities.
As recently as August, NOC
opposed reopening Libya’s
eastern oil ports in exchange
for payments to the militia
controlling them. Company of-
ficials feared the militia would
shut down the ports again af-
ter receiving payment.
Changes in militias’ tactics

Still, the marginal impact on
car sales could be felt this
decade.
Whenever it takes off, car
makers have made clear they
want a part of the mobility
business. Most car makers
have either bought stakes in
startups or launched their
own: General Motors has in-
vested in Lyft, Toyota in
Uber, Volkswagen in Gett.
Oddly, Volkswagen has also
launched a separate ride-
sharing startup. The problem
with this approach is that it
has encouraged a prolifera-
tion of small rivals to Uber,
none with the scale neces-
sary to succeed. Encourag-

ingly, BMW and Mercedes-
owner Daimler are said to be
discussing a merger of their
own carpool businesses, but
this has already run into
problems with a joint-ven-
ture partner.
These deals are partly
about securing access to the
emerging industry’s most
precious resource: data. It is
assumed autonomous vehi-
cles will teach themselves to
drive by learning from vast
amounts of data collected in
real driving conditions. But
the current leader in data
collection isn’t a mobility
provider but probably Alpha-
bet’s Waymo. Electric-vehicle

specialist Tesla has also col-
lected a lot of real driving
data via the data-enabled
cars it sold to consumers.
The only car maker to
have shown enthusiasm for
working as a contract manu-
facturer for Silicon Valley is
Fiat Chrysler , which is sup-
plying vehicles to Waymo.
Chief Executive Sergio Mar-
chionne, who regularly calls
for industry consolidation, is
betting that working with a
tech giant in a subordinate
role is better than having
power over a minnow.
The auto industry is roll-
ing in profits from near-re-
cord sales and low gas
prices, which make lucrative
SUVs more attractive. Yet in-
vestors are staying away and
stock valuations are dismal.
The rise of electric cars
and then the arrival of self-
driving vehicles will bring in
new, well-financed competi-
tors to the auto industry. It
will also transform a cyclical,
capital-intensive manufactur-
ing business into a more sta-
ble service provider with im-
mense potential for adver-
tising. The irony is that, after
the upheaval, investors could
value the winners in this
race much more highly than
they do the current industry
leaders.

would also undermine the
stable system of car dealer-
ships that has controlled the
industry for decades.
Another much analyzed
question concerns just how
many cars will be purchased
for shared ownership. New
York fund manager ARK esti-
mates that cheap autono-
mous taxis could eventually
halve the number of cars
bought in Europe and North
America every year. Other
projections are more benign:
UBS expects a maximum hit
to new car sales of 3% to 5%.
There will be fewer cars on
the road, but they will be
driven much more so the re-
placement cycle will be
faster.
Tech-industry bulls such
as ARK believe self-driving
technology will be ready in


  1. Car-industry types tend
    to be much more cautious.
    But the reality is likely to be
    more complex than a single
    date: Autonomous technol-
    ogy is likely to be introduced
    soonest in restricted urban
    areas before spreading to
    freeways and—perhaps many
    years later—the countryside.


Continuedfromthepriorpage

HEARD


duction agreement.
Nigeria, an OPEC member
that was exempted from cut-
ting, increased its output by
200,000 barrels a day in De-
cember.
Some analysts have ques-
tioned Iraq’s commitment to
cutting output after The Wall
Street Journal reported the
country’s plans to increase ex-
ports in January.
Still, Libyan output looms
largest over OPEC.
Libya’s National Oil remains
one of the last functioning in-
stitutions left in the country
and has become stronger in
recent weeks. Its 61,000 em-
ployees make it the largest
Libyan company by far, and it
accounts for 95% of the coun-

Continuedfromthepriorpage

LIBYA


way to allow or refuse cookies.”
But the proposals may
prompt companies to display
pop-ups asking users to switch
their settings to allow tracking
before they can continue using
the services.
“People who thought cookie
banners were annoying will be
disappointed to hear that
things won’t get better,” Ms.
Feehan said.
The EU’s rules come at a
timewhen the digital ad indus-
try is growing in Europe. Last
year, digital ad spending
reached around $35 billion and
is set to grow to $45 billion by
2020, according to market-re-
search firm eMarketer. While it
is unclear how much of that rev-
enue comes from targeted on-
line ads, if a significant number
of users opt out of those pre-

Continuedfromthepriorpage

mium ads, it could hit the bot-
tom line for big online ad bro-
kers like Google and Facebook.
Companies that don’t com-
ply could be fined as much as
4% of the firm’s world-wide
revenue, the EU said.
In a minor victory for the in-
dustry, the commission wa-
tered down parts of the pro-
posal from a previous draft
that would have defaulted the
user’s settings to reject the
tracking if a choice wasn’t
made when prompted.
That move has irked some
consumer and privacy advo-
cates.
The commission’s proposal
“is an improvement over what
we have now but it is clearly not
as good as a ‘do not track’ set-
ting turned on by default,” said
Johannes Kleis, head of commu-
nications at BEUC, the European
Consumer Organization.
Tuesday’s proposal would re-
place a directive, which provides
guidelines to member states on

how they should implement
rules, with a regulation that
would be applied the same way

in all 28 member states.
—Sam Schechner
contributed to this article.

Big Spending
Companies are spending an increasing share of their advertising
budgets in Europe on digital ads.

$

0

10

20

30

40

billion

2011 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16 ’17 ’18 ’19 ’

Projections Projections

50

0

10

20

30

40

%

2011 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16 ’17 ’18 ’19’

Digital ad spending Percentage of total media
ad spending

Source: eMarketer Inc. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.

EU


Co. CEO joined Valeant in May
to help restore battered inves-
tor confidence.
Valeant’s stock has col-
lapsed since late 2015, when
an accounting issue raised
questions about its earnings
and spurred a crisis of confi-
dence in management. The
company’s backers have con-
sistently argued the stock
market has ignored the value
of the underlying businesses,
while its detractors have fo-
cused on the company’s debt
and slumping earnings.
The stock was ahead 6.6%
at $16.37 Tuesday afternoon,
but it is still down 82% over
the past 12 months and well

below its all-time high above
$260 set in August 2015.
Valeant’s deal announce-
ments eased concerns that the
company would have to sell
assets at fire-sale prices. It
purchased CeraVe in 2008 for
$95 million and bought Den-
dreon out of bankruptcy in
2015 for about $500 million.
“Some good news finally,”
Evercore analyst Umer Raffat
headlined his note on the
sales, saying the reduction in
revenue would mostly be off-
set by the lower debt pay-
ments.
In a Tuesday note, Wells
Fargo & Co. analyst David
Maris that the proceeds from

the sales wouldn’t fully cover
the $3.8 billion in debt Valeant
has coming due by the end of
2018.
Valeant has put a number
of assets on the auction block
but has struggled to strike
deals at acceptable prices. It
came close but ultimately
failed to seal a deal to sell
stomach-drug maker Salix
Pharmaceuticals Ltd. to
Japan’s Takeda Pharmaceuti-
cal Co. for $10 billion. It is
also exploring a sale of its
Bausch & Lomb surgical equip-
ment business, which could
fetch $2.5 billion, people fa-
miliar with the matter have
said.
Dendreon is known for pros-
tate-cancer treatment
Provenge. The acquisition was
Valeant’s first big transaction
after losing a hostile bid in
2014 for Botox maker Allergan,
which went instead to Actavis
PLC for about $67 billion.
Valeant wasn’t a big player
in cancer treatments, and
Provenge proved a disappoint-
ing fit. Provenge had $
million in sales the year before
the acquisition; it isn’t clear
what revenue has been more
recently.
—Nick Kostov
contributed to this article.

Valeant Pharmaceuticals
International Inc. reached
deals to sell $2.1 billion in as-
sets, the struggling drug com-
pany’s biggest moves yet to
regroup around its consumer
offerings and pare its heavy
debt load.

The Canadian company
agreed to sell three skin-care
brands, including its CeraVe
line, to French cosmetics giant
L’Oréal SA for $1.3 billion. It
also said it would sell its Den-
dreon cancer business to Chi-
nese conglomerate Sanpower
for $820 million.
The asset sales are part of
Valeant Chief Executive Jo-
seph Papa’s efforts to
sharpen the company’s focus
on its key franchises in skin
drugs, stomach treatments,
eye care and consumer health
while selling noncore assets
to pay down its roughly $
billion in debt.
Mr. Papa was set to speak
later Tuesday at an investor
conference in San Francisco,
with analysts expecting to
hear updates on his vision for
Valeant. The former Perrigo

By Dana Mattioli ,
David Benoit and
Jonathan D. Rockoff

Valeant Sheds $2.1 Billion in Assets


CEO JosephPapa joined Valeant in May to boost investor confidence.

CHRISTINNE MUSCHI/REUTERS

INVESTMENT PROPERTIES

Business Real Estate & Auctions


ADVERTISEMENT

 

 

 

   


  
 

  

    


 

 
  
 

 

 
 




    


 

 
  
 


  



 

  
 

 

 !!
"
# $ 


% & ''


!  "  #

  $%   &'(
") % 
 *(* (

Notable Commercial
Properties.

Commercial Listings Every
Wednesday.

List Your Property Today.
Call +44 (0) 207 572 2123

To reprint or license content, please contact our reprints and licensing department at +1 800-843-0008 or http://www.djreprints.com

Free download pdf