Noncommutative Mathematics for Quantum Systems

(Dana P.) #1
Independence and L ́evy Processes in Quantum Probability 71

after some tedious, but straightforward, computation.


Remark 1.7.22 Ifν=δ 0 , thenMy=0 onL^2 (R+×R+,μ⊗ν), and


therefore



SxMy


Sx=0. This is of course a positive operator, and
its distribution isδ 0.


Theorem 1.7.23 Let X and Y be two positive self-adjoint operators on
a Hilbert space H such that X− 1 and Y are monotonically independent
w.r.t. to a unit vectorΩ ∈ H. Assume, furthermore, thatΩis cyclic,
that is,


alg{h(X),h(Y);h∈Cb(R+)}Ω=H.

Then



XY


X is essentially self-adjoint and the distribution w.r.t.Ω
of its closure is equal to the multiplicative monotone convolution of the
distributions of X and Y w.r.t.Ω, that is,


L

(√
XY


X,Ω

)
=L(X,Ω)mL(Y,Ω).

Proof Letμ=L(X,Ω),ν=L(Y,Ω).
By Theorem 1.7.13 it is sufficient to consider the caseX=Sxand


Y = My. In this case Proposition 1.7.21 shows thatz−



XY


X
has a bounded inverse for all√ z∈C\R. This implies that Ran(z−
XY



X)is dense for allz∈C\Rand that


XY


Xis essentially
self-adjoint,cf.[RS80, Theorem VIII.3].
Using Equation (1.7.6), we can compute the Cauchy transform


of the distribution of the closure of



XY


X. Letz∈C+, then we
have


G√XY√X(z) =


Ω,

(
z−


XY


X

)− 1


=


1 ,

(
z−


SxMy


Sx

)− 1
1


=


1 ,

1 +g 1
z−y

+h 1


where


g 1 (x) =


x−x+ (x− 1 )zGν(x)
( 1 −x)zGν(z) +x

=


x
( 1 −x)zGν(z) +x

−1,

h 1 (x) =

( 1 −


x)Gν(z)
( 1 −x)zGν(z) +x

.
Free download pdf