Table 4.66Increasable amount of research outputs in 211Us (NEAM sample in 2010)ID
LP
EI
ESI
M
SCI (%)
CSCD (%)
ID
LP
EI
ESI
M
SCI (%)
CSCD (%)
5
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
0
0
56
0.0
0.0
0.1
2.0
0
24
7
0.0
0.0
4.5
0.0
0
32
60
0.0
0.0
5.9
8.3
0
0
8
0.0
0.0
7.2
1.4
0
0
61
15.5
0.0
0.4
0.0
0
0
9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
1
63
0.0
0.0
5.9
0.0
0
0
11
0.0
410.6
2.2
0.0
0
31
64
0.0
254.6
0.0
3.8
0
0
14
62.9
137.4
0.1
0.0
0
0
75
7.7
40.7
1.1
0.0
0
68
17
102.4
255.1
5.3
0.0
0
125
76
0.0
0.0
5.4
5.8
21
0
18
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
0
15
77
334.8
1081.6
2.3
0.0
0
11
21
20.2
0.0
3.4
0.4
0
32
78
0.0
69.3
1.1
1.9
0
0
22
20.4
58.9
0.2
0.0
0
1
82
6.9
23.9
0.0
0.0
223
0
25
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
0
0
83
217.6
43.7
0.0
3.7
20
0
26
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
5
14
86
5.0
83.0
2.8
3.7
0
0
27
119.6
63.7
5.2
9.9
0
0
88
0.0
0.0
0.6
2.0
0
0
33
0.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
0
0
89
319.1
14.2
0.0
0.0
0
0
35
0.0
0.0
0.3
8.5
0
0
90
0.0
0.0
1.1
5.8
0
0
38
0.0
0.0
5.6
3.5
0
43
91
0.0
612.9
0.0
0.0
32
0
40
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.2
0
24
92
11.3
0.0
1.5
0.0
22
0
41
0.0
105.6
11.1
0.0
0
9
93
0.0
0.0
2.1
0.0
50
0
45
21.6
0.0
2.1
1.7
0
0
94
138.4
144.5
0.0
0.2
0
0
47
0.0
0.0
4.6
0.0
21
0
95
0.0
227.5
1.0
2.0
239
0
49
24.6
304.5
2.3
19.3
0
0
98
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
214
3
51
0.0
144.3
0.3
2.2
0
0
99
10.7
0.0
1.5
0.0
0
0
53
32.5
4.4
0.9
0.0
0
0
Note1 LP refers to the indicator of licensed patents. 2 M refers to the indicator of monographs206 4 Evaluation on Research Efficiency of 211Us: The DEA Approach