RUSSIAN FEDERATION
MONGOLIA
SOUTH
KOREA
JAPAN
CHINA
NORTH
KOREA
INDIA
BHUTAN
NEPAL
TAIWAN
BANGLADESH
CAMBODIA PHILIPPINES
VIETNAM
THAILAND
LAOS
MYANMAR
PALAU
INDONESIA EAST TIMOR
SINGAPORE
BRUNEI
MALAYSIA
Sea of
Japan
(East Sea)
East
China
Sea
Philippine
Sea
KAZAKHSTAN
TAJIKISTAN
UZBEKISTANKYRGYZSTAN
TURKMENISTAN
AZERBAIJIAN
IRAQ IRAN
KUWAIT PAKISTAN
AFGHANISTAN
Arabian
Sea Bay of
Bengal
SAUDI
ARABIA
OMAN
YEMEN
BAHRAIN
QATAR
UAE
Red sea
SYRIA
ISRAEL JORDAN
PALESTINE
LEBANON
TURKEY
SRI LANKA
Black
Sea
Caspian
Sea
States of Transition
DEMOCRACY HAS NUMEROUS SHADES OF GREY, WHICH IS WHY IT IS USEFUL
TO MEASURE DEMOCRATIC PRACTICE THROUGH THE DEMOCRACY INDEX
Democracy is a label applied
quite liberally by states, but it’s
worth noting that while several
countries proclaim themselves
as democratic, this is not always
the case in practice. Democracy is
understood to be a political system
that elects its governments through
free and fair elections, and which
requires the active participation of
citizens in politics and civic life. By
this definition, the application of the
label to the political landscape of
some states that declare themselves
democratic requires a hefty pinch of
salt – which is why we’ve included the
country’s ranking in the Democracy
Index as a means of measurement.
The Democracy Index
Categorises countries as one of four regime types:
FULL DEMOCRACIES (RAngE 8–10)
There are no countries that are deemed full or “pure”
democracies in Asia
FLAWED DEMOCRACIES (RAngE 6–8)
Practise free elections but may have weak
governance, an underdeveloped political culture
and poor levels of political participation
HYBRID REgIME (RAngE 4–6)
Combine democratic traits, such as elections, with
autocratic practices, such as political repression
AUt HORItARIAn (RAngE 0–4)
Countries ruled by a single government or person
who has unlimited authority, and where people have
limited political freedoms
Flawed Democracies
Range 6–8
Hybrid Regimes
Range 4–6
Authoritarian Regimes
Range 0–4
LEgEnDS
In FOCUS