New Eastern Europe - November-December 2017

(Ben Green) #1

34


Others quickly followed suit in a confounding tangle of diplomatic blackmail
schemes. Uzbekistan cut off a section of river flowing into Kazakhstan in a demand
for unsettled debts to be paid. In return, Kazakhstan disconnected part of the
Soviet-period telephone grid used by Uzbekistan. So Kazakhstan then appealed
to Tajikistan to release greater amounts of its own water into the Amu-Darya,
so that Uzbekistan might be compelled to allow more to enter Kazakhstan. The
pattern repeated in different permutations over the years, as each country used
whatever commodity it had in relative abundance – gas for Uzbekistan, coal and
gas for Kazakhstan, water for Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan – as bargaining chips in
their disputes.
As implementation of the 1998 Syr-Darya agreement clearly became unfeasi-
ble, the document was allowed to lapse after its initial five-year cycle, forcing all
the parties into ad hoc arrangements. With time, self-sufficiency at all costs has
become a priority in all areas. Kyrgyzstan has borrowed heavily from China to
build high-voltage power lines within the nation’s borders. Uzbekistan has bored
through mountains to link its Ferghana Valley with the rest of the country, thereby
obviating the need for circling around mountains through Tajikistan. Tajikistan
has learnt to live without Uzbekistan’s gas supplies.
But some things – like the ambitions of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan to build gi-
ant hydroelectric dams that they dream will one day generate billions in income
from exports of electricity to Afghanistan, Pakistan and India – may be harder to
work around.

Tajikistan’s marvel

In Tajikistan, the Rogun Dam project is an all-consuming national obsession.
Work on it started as far back as 1967, but the progress was halting. By the time
the Soviet Union had collapsed, workers had managed to erect a 40-meter high
dam and build 20 kilometres of service tunnels. The
outbreak of the civil war in Tajikistan led to a mass ex-
odus of technicians and then work was suspended in
1993 due to a lack of funding. One year later, the com-
pleted section of the dam was washed away in a flood
and the tunnels filled with water.
Building restarted in 2004 under the aegis of Rus-
sian aluminium titan RusAl, which pledged to spend
two billion US dollars on the project, but that arrangement fell through in 2007,
forcing Tajikistan to go it alone. If and when it is ever completed, Rogun Dam will

In Tajikistan,
the Rogun Dam
project is an
all-consuming
national obsession.

Opinion & Analysis Central Asia and water, Peter Leonard
Free download pdf