42 The Americas The EconomistFebruary 10th 2018
2
T
HIS year marks the 40th anniversary
of the start of the democratic wave
that swept over Latin America and turned
military dictators into political flotsam. It
is an anniversary tinged with gloom. De-
mocracy is in retreat worldwide, with
scholars identifying more than two dozen
countries that have reverted to authoritar-
ianism in this century. Many worry for its
future in Latin America, too.
In fact, democracy has held up surpris-
ingly well in the region. There are only
two clear cases of regress. Venezuela and
Nicaragua have abolished term limits and
their elected presidents now rule as dicta-
tors. Two other countries are question-
marks. In both Honduras and Bolivia, in-
cumbent presidents have got the courts to
set aside term limits. Both rule as auto-
crats. Even so, in Bolivia Evo Morales, a
successful president since 2006, may
struggle to win an election due in 2019.
Ecuador, where Rafael Correa ruled in
a similar fashion for a decade until 2017,
might have been on that list. Mr Correa’s
successor, Lenín Moreno, seemed at first
to be a placeholder. But he has proved to
be his own man. On February4th Ecua-
doreans approved in a referendum, by
64% to 36%, the reimposition of a two-
term limit for all elected officials. This
blocked Mr Correa’s future return.
A bigger worry than regress in Latin
America is political decay—“when politi-
cal systems fail to adjust to changing cir-
cumstances” because of opposition from
entrenched stakeholders, as Francis Fuku-
yama, a political scientist, putsit. Worry-
ingly, that is the case in Costa Rica, the re-
gion’s oldest and seemingly one of its
strongest democracies.
Neither of the two parties that forged
this democracy and ruled from 1948 until
2014—the National Liberation Party (PLN)
and the Social Christians—has candidates
in the run-off election for the country’s
presidency, scheduled for April 1st. Rather,
the contest will feature Fabricio Alvarado,
an evangelical pastor and gospel singer
whose main proposal is opposition to gay
marriage, and Carlos Alvarado (no rela-
tion), whose Citizens’ Action Party (PAC)
has been in power since 2014. It won only
ten of the 57 seats in the newlegislative as-
sembly in the elections on February 4th.
Fabricio, who was his party’s sole legis-
lator until those elections, starts the run-off
as the favourite. His rise is circumstantial: it
owes everything to an opinion by the Inter-
American Court of Human Rights last
month that Costa Rica should legalise gay
marriage. Only 32% of Costa Ricans agree
(though that is up from 17% in 2012), accord-
ing to LAPOP, a regionwide poll based at
Vanderbilt University in Tennessee.
But the political malaise in Costa Rica
goes much deeper. Support for the political
system, measured on a composite index
drawn up byLAPOP, has fallen from 87% in
1983 to 62% in 2016. Corruption is one rea-
son. But this was far worse in the 1970s, ob-
serves Kevin Casas Zamora, a political sci-
entist and former vice-president of Costa
Rica. “It’s a very easyexplanation for very
complex ills,” he says.
Costa Rica is in many ways a success-
ful country. It has opened up to globalisa-
tion, diversifying its economy with new
industries, such as medical devices, eco-
tourism and renewable power. But politi-
cians have failed to deal with rising crime,
income inequality and poverty. That is
partly because they have failed for many
years to approve an increase in tax rev-
enues, which at14% ofGDPare low for the
country’s level of development. And that
in turn is because of the fragmentation of
politics (there are now seven parties in
the assembly). There are simply too many
veto-wielders.
In Latin America, even as the new is
born the old tends not to die. The social-
democraticPAC wars with the PLNbut
has failed to kill it off: with 17 seats, the PLN
will be the largest party in the new assem-
bly. Costa Rica suffers a vicious circle in
which the voters seek new political actors
who fare as badly as the old ones, says Mr
Casas. The current president, Luis Guil-
lermo Solís, was a once-fresh face who
failed to fix the budget or reform taxes.
Costa Rica’s problems are a sign of the
times in the region. Evangelical Protest-
ants are a rising political force in several
countries, as “culture wars” open up a
new policy cleavage. That applies in Bra-
zil, Guatemala and Peru and bodes ill for
the rights of women and gay people. Polit-
ical fragmentation is on the rise, especial-
ly in Brazil and Colombia. Old-style par-
ties have become empty shells but in
many countries have yet to be replaced.
Yet electorates are much more de-
manding because Latin American societ-
ies have changed dramatically. Political
systems are struggling to evolve in tan-
dem. Democracy is very much alive in the
region. But it is not wholly well.
Bello The ills of Latin American democracy
Political decay is as big a threat as authoritarianism
lot of Americans are illegal immigrants,
having overstayed their visas, butthe au-
thorities usually turn a blind eye.
With 10,000 Americans a day reaching
the age of 65, the influx is likely to continue.
Membership of the Lake Chapala society
surged last year. Ajijic is not the only desti-
nation. In the nearby town of Chapala sun-
seeking seniors stroll through a renovated
lakefront park. Puerto Vallarta teems with
aged foreigners. International Living, an
American website, last year rated Mexico
the world’s best place to retire abroad.
Though some Mexicans grumble about
pensioners pushing up house prices, many
welcome the trade they bring. Francisco
García, a farmer from Veracruz, drives 12
hours a dozen times a year to Ajijic to sell
coffee from the back of his truck. Occasion-
ally, cultures confuse each other. An offer
by a local charity manned by American
volunteers to neuter stray dogs in Ajijic
was boycotted by a church, which deems
any contraception a sin.
One deterrent to mass migration is
health care. Ajijic is cluttered with adver-
tisements for dentists and plastic surgeons.
A check-up with an English-speaking doc-
tor costs 250 pesos ($13). But Medicare, the
United States’ publicly financed medical
scheme for people over 65, does not pay
out south of the border.
Mexico’s government wants to attract
more American pensioners and their dol-
lars despite itstetchy relationship with Mr
Trump. Although the constitution bizarre-
ly bans foreigners from buying beachfront
property, the government has left open a
legal loophole that lets them do it. It has
streamlined the issuing of residency visas.
Javier Degollado, Chapala’s mayor, has
commissioned a 28-page plan for tennis
courts, golf courses and museums. Most
Mexicans loathe Mr Trump. American visi-
tors, of all stripes, are another matter. 7