39
model minority · reportage
FEBRUARY 2018
agitation,” an official document on the
lead-up to 1984, the central government
declared, “The Anandpur Sahib Resolu-
tion is at total variance with the basic
concept of the unity and integrity of
the nation as expressed in our constitu-
tion. It cannot be accepted as a basis for
discussion.”
Even while the Akali Dal was at the
forefront of the Punjabi Suba movement
and central in pushing Sikh inter-
ests—and even providing formidable
resistance to Indira Gandhi’s draconian
Emergency in the preceding decade—
the party’s electoral success was not
guaranteed. Punjabi Sikhs did not vote
as a block, and the dominant Congress,
under Gandhi, courted and sometimes
won Sikh votes. In its confrontation
with the Akalis, the central govern-
ment, under the Congress, shored up
a figure who was proving to be a deft
navigator of the tensions of this era—a
charismatic, incendiary preacher
named Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale.
An orthodox Sikh with a substan-
tial following, Bhindranwale openly
preached violence in pursuit of his
desired ends. His followers are thought
to have assassinated two of his ideo-
logical opponents, and his organisa-
tion contributed to Punjab’s escalating
pre-1984 militancy. When asked if he
supported Khalistan, Bhindranwale
said “We are not in favour of Kha-
listan nor are we against it.” He often
used the term “qaum” to refer to the
religious characteristics of Sikhs, mark-
ing them out as a distinct and homog-
enous entity. His rhetoric emboldened
Khalistani separatists. “Sikhs are living
like slaves in independent India,” he
claimed. “Today every Sikh considers
himself as a second-rate citizen.” The
scholar Harnik Deol has written that
Bhindranwale was “able to convey a
specific definition of a Sikh” that “led
to the dissemination and consolidation
of a puritanical Sikh identity to a large
section of the population for the very
first time.”
Bhindranwale’s allegiances shifted
between the Congress and the Akalis
depending on what was most expedient
to his survival. As he grew increasingly
powerful, he began making demands
of the Congress that Gandhi would not
accept. Bhindranwale and the Con-
gress fell out. The preacher and his
increasingly militant followers moved
into the Golden Temple complex in
Amritsar, from where Bhindranwale
issued commands and ordered assassi-
nations. The stage was set for one of the
most infamous incidents in Sikh—and
I nd ia n—h istor y.
On the evening of 5 June 1984, the
Indian military stormed Sikhism’s holi-
est site, hoping to kill Bhindranwale
and flush out his backers. Gandhi was
told that the raid—named Operation
Blue Star—would be quick and rela-
tively devoid of violence. Haphazardly
planned and hastily executed, it instead
took all night and killed scores of civil-
ians. Government troops succeeded in
killing Bhindranwale—a deeply divisive
figure among Sikhs to this day—but
also caused serious damage to the Akal
Takht, or “timeless throne,” which
stands across from the Golden Temple
itself. Tank guns blew a hole in the
structure’s iconic central dome.
Operation Blue Star further polar-
ised India along religious and ideologi-
cal lines. In the aftermath, some Sikh
military troops mutinied, and support
for Khalistan grew. On 31 October
1984, two of Gandhi’s Sikh bodyguards
killed her as she was walking out of her
residence. The anti-Sikh pogrom—per-
petrated by organised Hindu mobs and
led mostly by Congress politicians—oc-
curred in the three days immediately
afterwards. According to reports made
available by one of several subsequent
enquiry commissions, public buses
were used to transport the mobs, vot-
ers’ lists were used to identify Sikh
homes and the police disarmed Sikhs
who were trying to defend themselves.
the air india flight 182 bombing was
just one instance of the use of lethal
methods by Khalistani separatists to
retaliate for 1984 and advance their
cause. According to Human Rights
Watch, “Sikh separatists in Punjab
committed serious human rights abus-
es, including the massacre of civilians,
attacks upon Hindu minorities in the
state, and indiscriminate bomb attacks
in crowded places.” The Indian gov-
ernment carried out a brutal counter-
insurgency, led by the police officer
KPS Gill. Through the 1980s and 1990s,
militancy in Punjab was stamped out.
The methods used by Gill, himself
Sikh, were vicious and inhumane, and
included the torture and extrajudicial
killing of thousands.
On his website, Jagmeet Singh refers
to this as part of a 20-year “genocidal
campaign” in which “Sikh youth disap-
peared, torture was rampant, and Sikhs
endured relentless state-sanctioned
india today group / getty images