The EconomistApril 14th 2018 27
1
For daily analysis and debate on China, visit
Economist.com/china
W
HEN the occupants of “Snowpanda
House” in Ahtari zoo, Finland, were
first allowed to play in the open air in mid-
February, they bounded out and rolled in
the white stuff. Xi Jinping, China’s presi-
dent, had said the furry animals would act
as “messengers of friendship” when he
promised them to Finland during a visit
last year en route to America. On the same
trip Mr Xi used a refuelling stop in Alaska
to butter up his hosts there, too. The Ameri-
can north was “a mythical, almost mystical
place”, a local spokesperson quoted him as
saying—a bit “like a Shangri-La”.
Mr Xi has been showing a growing in-
terest in Arctic countries. In 2014 he re-
vealed in a speech that China itself wanted
to become a “polar great power”. Last year
he met leaders from seven of the eight
members of the Arctic Council, a group of
northern countries that admitted China
and four other Asian states as observers in
- In January the Chinese government
published its first policy document outlin-
ing its Arctic strategy. The paper referred to
China as “a near-Arctic nation” (never
mind that its most northerly settlement is
no closer to the Arctic than Berlin is). It also
linked China’s Arctic plans with Mr Xi’s
Belt and Road Initiative, a scheme for
building infrastructure abroad to improve
links between Asia, Africa and Europe.
China’s ambitions are fuelled by a wide
range of interests. It wants access to the
Arctic for its researchers so they can work
tic waters. China is excited by this pos-
sibility (its media speak of an “ice silk
road”). In the coming decades such routes
could cut several thousand kilometres off
journeys between Shanghai and Europe.
Sending ships through the Arctic could
also help to revive port cities in China’s
north-eastern rustbelt, notes Anne-Marie
Brady, the author of a recent book, “China
as a Polar Great Power”. China is thinking
of building ports and other infrastructure
in the Arctic to facilitate shipping. State-
linked firms in China talk of building an
Arctic railway across Finland.
Chinese analysts believe that using Arc-
tic routes would help China strategically,
too. It could reduce the need to ship goods
through the Malacca Strait, a choke-point
connecting the Pacific and Indian oceans.
Much of China’s global shipping passes
through the strait. It worries endlessly
about the strait’s vulnerability to block-
ade—for example, should war break out
with America.
There are no heated territorial disputes
in the Arctic, but there are sensitivities, in-
cluding Canada’s claim to the North-West
Passage, a trans-Arctic waterway that
America regards as international—ie, be-
longing to no single state. China does not
want to be seen as a clumsy interloper.
One point of the policy document was to
allay fears that China might muscle its way
into the Arctic as it has in the South China
Sea. The paper stresses that China will play
by international rules and co-operate with
the Arctic Council (its members include
polar great-powers to reckon with: Ameri-
ca and Russia).
Plenty of non-Arctic countries, includ-
ing European ones, have similar dreams.
But China is “by far the outlier” in terms of
the amount of money it has pledged or al-
ready poured into the region, says Marc
Lanteigne of Massey University in New
out how melting ice affects weather pat-
terns, among other things. Their findings
could help China devise responses to its
problems with air pollution and water
scarcity. China is also keen to tap into the
Arctic resources that will become easier to
exploit as the ice cap retreats. They include
fish, minerals, oil and gas. The region could
hold a quarter of the world’s as-yet-undis-
covered hydrocarbons, according to the
United States Geological Survey. Chinese
firms are interested in mining zinc, ura-
nium and rare earths in Greenland.
As the ice melts, it maybecome more
feasible for cargo ships to sail through Arc-
The Arctic
A silk road through ice
BEIJING
China explains its dreams of becoming a polar power
China
Also in this section
28 China’s attempt at Davos
North
Pole
Rotterdam
Athens
Moscow
Sea route
“One Road”
Land route
“One Belt”
Arctic
route
Kuala
Lumpur
Mombasa
Kolkata
Xi’an
Zhanjiang
Shanghai
Alaska
Greenland
Malacca
Strait
Suez Canal
Beijing
RUSSIA
CHINA
CANADA
FINLAND
DENMARK
To cap it all
Planned areas of infrastructure building