56 The EconomistApril 14th 2018
For daily coverage of business, visit
Economist.com/business-finance
1
“T
HIS is what $3bn looks like.” So
beams a manager at Chevron Phil-
lips Chemical (CPC), a petrochemical com-
pany jointly owned by Chevron and Phil-
lips 66, both American oil firms. She
throws open her arms in a figurative em-
brace of a giant cracker (pictured) built by
the firm in Baytown, a gritty part of Hous-
ton. The new plant turns vast quantities of
ethane, which is derived from natural gas,
into ethylene, an important building block
in plastic. Another nearby facility, which
the firm has recently expanded, converts
the ethylene into plastic resin that is sold
worldwide. All told, CPChas spent some
$6bn expanding its chemicals-production
infrastructure around Houston.
A decade ago, this would have been un-
imaginable. Chemicals firms in America,
beaten down by rivals from the Middle
East that enjoyed cheap feedstocks and
others from China feasting on subsidised
capital, had not invested in new local
plants in years. Growth in global demand
for chemicals, once roaring, had slowed
thanks to the global financial crisis. Ameri-
ca had costly workers, ageing capital stock,
pricey feedstocks and sluggish demand.
Some crackers were shut down.
It is astonishing, then, that the CPC
plant is justone of six new megaprojects in
America. According to the American
Chemistry Council (ACC), an industry um-
brella group, over $185bn in new chemical
light the risks of his recent trade initiatives.
Behind the rejuvenation lie two things.
One is a recent wave of what Jason McLinn
of Bain, a consultancy, calls “portfolio re-
shaping”. Commodity chemicals, which
are produced in bulk, and specialty chemi-
cals, such as those used as additives and in-
gredients, do not have much to do with
each other, he says, but chemicals firms
seeking growth in sluggish markets like
America typically developed both. Now,
under pressure from activist investors,
bosses are spinning off non-core business-
es and bulking up in core areas. This is pro-
ducing firms with the gargantuan scale
needed to take on their giant state-spon-
sored international rivals. This week, for
example, news surfaced that American
regulators will approve the $60bn take-
over of Monsanto, an American agro-
chemicals firm, by Germany’s Bayer.
Dow, whose long-standing boss, An-
drew Liveris, stepped down as chairman
this month, is a case in point. By acquiring
DuPont, a local rival, for $130bn last year,
he turned Dow into the world’s biggest
chemicals firm by sales. The next step in
the master plan is to combine the specialty
and agricultural-chemicals arms of the
two firms, and spin each of them out sepa-
rately. What remains will focus on the
automotive, packaging and construction
industries. David Witte ofIHSMarkit, a re-
search firm, believes it will create a pure-
play rival to the biggest firms in the sector.
“I’d rather own a small, subscale,
poorly-run cracker in America than any in
Europe right now,” chuckles Jonas Oxgaard
of Bernstein, an equity-research firm. That
quip alludes to the other enormous edge
that the American chemicals business has
at the moment. The shale revolution is un-
leashing a tidal wave of cheap natural gas
and related liquids that can be used in-
investments has been announced since
2010, with half of those plants already built
or currently under construction (see chart).
The industry now accounts for roughly
half of all investment in American manu-
facturing. With annual shipments of over
$500bn, it is one of America’s largest ex-
port sectors.
This remarkable turnaround in the
American chemicals industry’s fortunes
raises two questions. Why did it happen,
and how sustainable is the boom? The an-
swers point to how clever new ideas are re-
shaping the “old economy”. They also of-
fer clues about the viability of the
industrial renaissance that President Do-
nald Trump wants for America and high-
America’s chemicals industry
Cracking on
BAYTOWN, TEXAS
A once-moribund business has become one of America’s largest exporters. But
politics threatens to get in its way
Business
Also in this section
57 Volkswagen shifts gear
58 Law-firm mergers
58 Rakuten’s struggles
59 Pipelines in Canada
60 The problem with meal kits
60 Shipping and carbon emissions
Schumpeter is away
Shale and hearty
Source: IHS Markit
United States, chemical industry, tonnes m
FORECAST
0
100
200
300
400
0
5
10
15
20
2005 10 15 20 25
New installations Capacity