29
there is very little thought put into the
well-being of the inhabitants or that the
concepts of ‘adequate’ or ‘habitable’ are
quite low down the order in most
government schemes.
Thirdly, the curators, with the help of
film-maker Sanjiv Shah, have produced
a film which is actually the heart of the
exhibition. Looking at the complexity of
the ecology of housing, the film shifts
between a narrative on the condition of
housing in different areas and schemes,
and also has selected commentaries by
architects, urbanists, town planners and
activists, who explain the many nuances
of the housing crises. The treatment of
the film is balanced, in the sense that it
puts forth the complexity of the issue
with the sensitivity it deserves, without
being biased to any one school of thought.
Overall the placement of the different
materials in the exhibition makes it easy
for the viewer to navigate and take in the
various aspects. By planning a series of
multi-disciplinary talks and a
conference revolving around the housing
situation in India the curators attempt
to go beyond the exhibition display.
Despite all the reference material,
lectures, and other information, there
are no easy answers in this exhibition.
So what is the state housing? The
curators have refrained from answering
that question; they leave that for the
viewer to decide. Through exhaustive
research and documentation from various
governmental and non-governmental
agencies as well as interviews and case
studies, they provide just enough
stimuli for the audience to understand
Should migrants have
the right to squat on
public land if the
government fails to
provide affordable
housing?