34 6 august 2018
by rivers and streams and deposited into
other locations or simply gotten embed-
ded into other rocks, where they have
remained for billions of years until now.
These tiny zircon crystals have now be-
gun to tell us a very different story from
the one we have heard for so many years.
“We have always believed Earth was this
hot and hellish place 4 billion years back.
But some of these zircons, although it is
still debated, are telling us it may have
become cooler and wetter, even liveable
long before,” Chaudhuri says.
s tudies on ancient zircon crystals have
revealed several interesting things. They
have pointed to the presence of a stable
primordial crust on the earth’s surface
by 4.4 billion years ago and a distinctive
oxygen isotopic signature that indicates
the presence of water on Earth’s surface
by 4.3 billion years ago. This is far from the
picture painted of earth as a hot and mol-
ten world, which, let alone life, could not
even support a crust of solid rock.
all of this now leads to a larger ques-
tion. If Earth’s atmosphere had signifi-
cantly cooled for the presence of a stable
crust and for water, could life be far be-
hind? The most explosive study in this
field came in 2015, with the finding of a
4.1 billion-year-old biological signature
within a zircon’s chemical composition.
The journal Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences published a study
where researchers had found a 4.1 billion
year old zircon mineral with a chemical
composition that suggested organic life.
If true, it meant that our earliest ances-
tors—in their single-celled microbial
form—had emerged a long time before
anyone had thought possible. and this
emergence pre-dated the earliest undis-
puted fossil evidence for life—a fossil-
ised mat of single cell microbes called
stromatolites that grew in shallow seas
and was discovered in a sandstone rock
in australia—by 600 million years.
In this study, the researchers had found
tiny bits of potentially undisturbed graph-
ite, a form of carbon, in a single 4.1 billion-
year-old zircon crystal from Jack Hills in
Western australia. The graphite had a
higher ratio of carbon-12 (light atoms) to
carbon-13 (heavier ones). This suggests
that the carbon had been processed by
living organisms, because, according to
geochemists, some of these life forms tend
to incorporate more of the light carbon
and less of the heavy one.
The researchers have themselves
claimed that it is possible for non-biolog-
ical processes to lead to such an isotopic
ratio, but it is highly unlikely. “It’s not a
smoking gun for there being life at 4.1 bil-
lion years,” the lead researcher Elizabeth
Bell from the university of California
then told Los angeles Times. “But if you
saw that same isotopic signature on the
Earth today, you would say, ‘That is from
a biogenic source’.”
s
InCE THEn, THERE have been
few more studies that have hinted
at a very early emergence of life. some
australian researchers claimed to have
found 3.7-billion-year-old stromatolites,
or fossil remains of microbes, in 2016. Last
year, another group of researchers report-
ed finding 4.28-billion-year-old fossilised
microorganisms that once thrived under-
water around hydrothermal vents in the
nuvvuagittuq Belt, which consists of very
ancient rocks close to Quebec, Canada.
Earlier this year, another study, published
in Science Advances, found that two 4.5
billion-year-old meteorites which had
separately crashed to Earth back in 1998,
contained liquid water along with com-
plex organic substances (hydrocarbons
and amino acids) that may have been the
ingredients for life.
all of this is still hotly contested. This
early emergence of life—however tanta-
lising—is still at best a claim. It may hint
to an origin of life not as simple or recent
as we have believed. But it is still a ‘might
have been’ than a definite ‘life was here’.
o ur best bet to get to the root of all this,
Mazumdar says, lies in finding more of the
oldest materials on earth. Mazumdar and
Chaudhuri say this will be the next step
in their research. They will be looking for
more samples of ancient zircon crystals
in India and examining their oxygen and
carbon compositions for early signs of wa-
ter and perhaps even life. “Even if we find
water, it will be very significant. Because
wherever there is water, there is usually
life,” Chaudhuri says.
a ccording to Mazumdar, while there
are several capable geologists working
in India, very few international agencies
and researchers have attempted to look at
rocks in India. “If you search, you will defi-
nitely get more [zircons here],” Mazumdar
says. “But I think with this discovery [of
the second-oldest zircon in odisha], it will
intensify work in this field in India. I’m
sure geologists and the geological society
of India are already looking more intently
at Champua.” There is even talk of an in-
stitute, either an IIT or the gsI, he says, ac-
quiring a machine for isotopic analyses of
zircon minerals in India soon.
s o what are the chances of laying
one’s hands on a zircon mineral that con-
tains evidence of early life? “Look at the
australian study [the 2015 study of a 4.1
billion-year-old zircon carrying carbon
composition suggesting life]. It was a
freak finding. To find such a zircon with
such a carbon composition from among
thousands of samples was really lucky,”
Chaudhuri says. “and that’s one thing I
have learnt with our current discovery.
you need to be a sharp geologist, yes, but
also very lucky.” n
“we have believed earth was this hot and hellish
place 4 billion years back. but some of these zircons,
although it is still debated, tell us it may have become
cooler and wetter, even liveable long before”
Trisro Ta Chaudhuri, geologist
Geologists Trisrota Chaudhuri
(left) and Rajat Mazumdar
life