work believed to have God as its ultimate author, which the community
recognizes and accepts as determinative for its belief and practice; it is not
necessarily a fixed text but may be still developing and circulating in sev-
eral textual forms.A collection of authoritative Scriptures,as opposed to a
canon, is an open collection to which more books can be added. Certainly
such a collection was recognized as fundamental to the Jewish religion
from sometime in the first half of the Second Temple period; at that time it
was probably confined to the Law of Moses, as attested by the OG transla-
tion of the Pentateuch and the Samaritan canon. According to the distinc-
tion between “a collection of authoritative books” and “an authoritative
collection of books,” throughout the Second Temple period the collection
was growing and thus there was not yet a canon.
Acanon,as defined above, is a religious body’s official, definitively de-
bated and permanently decided, exclusive list of inspired, authoritative
books that constitute its recognized corpus of sacred Scripture. TheBible,
in the singular, denotes a textual form of the collection of canonical books.
In contrast to the canon, which is the normative list of the books, the Bible
is the text of that collection of books, conceived of as a single anthology,
and usually presented physically as such. Thus, the term is probably anach-
ronistic prior to the codex format of the collection. “The Scriptures” can be
an open collection, but the “Bible” connotes an already closed collection.
Thecanonical processis the journey of the many disparate works of liter-
ature within the ongoing community from their early stages when they be-
gan to be considered as somehow authoritative, through the sifting and en-
dorsement process, to the final judgment concerning their inspired
character as the unified and defined collection of Scripture — that is, until
the reflective judgment of recognition that officially constituted the canon.
Canonas such is a static concept, the result of a retrospective conclusion that
something has come to be. Until that final decision is reached,process toward
canonorcanonical processis preferable. Some speak of an “open canon” or of
“adaptability” as the primary characteristic of the canon; but the canon is by
definition closed, and so an “open collection” is preferable; and adaptability
is a function, not the essence, of the canon — how it is used, not what it is.
The Evidence from Qumran for the Process toward Canon
In the absence of clear early written discussion, surveying the Qumran evi-
dence can be somewhat illuminating, especially since it generally agrees
145
The Jewish Scriptures: Texts, Versions, Canons
EERDMANS -- Early Judaism (Collins and Harlow) final text
Tuesday, October 09, 2012 12:03:58 PM