b2815 Tissue Engineering and Nanotheranostics “9.61x6.69”222 Tissue Engineering and Nanotheranostics
Acknowledgment
Support for the research providing the subject matter for this chapter
was provided by the Schafer Foundation for Centriolar Research and
is sincerely appreciated. Also, the consultation and encouragement of
Bardyl Tirana, Roger Adelman, and Donglu Shi is acknowledged.
Finally, the assistance of Mary Schartman in preparing the figures is
acknowledged.
References
- Chow EKH, Ho D. Cancer nanomedicine: From drug delivery to
imaging. Sci. Tran. Med. 5 (216), 1–12 (2013). - Arruebo M, FernándezPacheco R, Ibarra MR, Santamaria J. Magnetic
nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nanotoday 2 , 22–32 (2007). - Pokorný J, Hasek J, Vanis J, Jelínek F. Biophysical aspects of
cancer — eletromagnetic mechanism. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 46 (5),
310–321 (2008). - McCaig CD, Rajnicek AM, Song B, Zhao M. Controlling cell behavior
electrically: Current views and future potential. Physiol. Rev. 85 (3),
943–978 (2005). - Binggeli R, Weinstein RC. Membrane potentials and sodium channels:
hypotheses for growth regulation and cancer formation based on
changes in sodium channels and gap junctions. J. Theor. Biol. 123 (4),
377–401 (1986). - Djamgoz MBA, Mycielska M, Madeja Z, Fraser SP, Korohoda W.
Directional movement of rat prostate cancer cells in directcurrent
electric field: Involvement of voltagegated Na+ channel activity. J. Cell
Sci. 114 (14), 2697–2705 (2001). - Pokorný J. Physical aspects of biological activity and cancer. AIP Adv.
2 , 011207–1 to 011207–11 (2012). - Cuzick J, Holland R, Barth V, Davies R, Faupel M, Fentiman I,
Frischbier HJ, LaMarque JL, Merson M, Sacchini V, Vanel D, Veronesi U.
Electropotential measurements as a new diagnostic modality for breast
cancer. Lancet. 352 (9125), 359–363 (1998). - Zhao M, Bai H, Wang E, Forrester JV, McCaig CD. Electrical
stimulation directly induced preangiogenic responses in vascular