Tissue Engineering And Nanotheranostics

(Steven Felgate) #1

“9.61x6.69” b2815 Tissue Engineering and Nanotheranostics


Multifunctional Nanomaterials for Cancer Theranostics 231

reactions are often appended,^71 which further increases the adverse


drug reactions. The use of nanocarriers such as polymers, mesoporous


silica, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) can provide both a hydrophobic and


hydrophilic environment, loading room which enhances solubility and


overcomes the side effects of the cosolvent added.^72 (2) Drug burst


release and rapid clearance. Without the loading and delivery by nano­


materials, chemotherapy drugs will be immediately absorbed and dis­


tributed in the major organs once they enter the body, causing damage


to the normal tissues. In addition, the drugs will be soon metabolized


and excreted, which subsequently requires repeated high dosages. By


the protection of nanomaterials, the encapsulated drugs in delivery


vehicles are more stable. Meanwhile, the behavior of slow release is


beneficial to reduce the damage caused by the rapid absorption and


distribution with traditional drug delivery routes. (3) Poor drug biodis­


tribution. Due to their non­specific nature, only limited chemothera­


peutic drugs reach the tumor tissues, and the majority are distributed


to other normal tissues. By modifying the targeting ligands on the


surface of nanomaterials, the targeting drug delivery systems can signifi­


cantly be taken by tumor tissues through recognizing the receptors on


the surface of the tumor cells, which reduces drugs toxicity to normal


tissues and enhances the delivery of drugs to the site of interest.


Therefore, the targeting drug delivery nanosystems have unparalleled


advantages compared with current chemotherapeutics administration


routes as well as great potential for the future.


It should be noted that not any nanocarriers can be achieved


in vivo drug delivery and cancer therapy. The physicochemical differ­


ences of nanomaterials have a significant influence in the in vivo dis­


tribution and cellular internalization, including their size, shape,


charge, etc.^73


Effect of size. The size of nanomaterials mainly affects the bio­


distribution, kinetics of release, and cellular uptake.74–76 The mecha­


nisms of uptake of nanomaterials are known as phagocytosis, diffusion,


and fluid phase endocytosis, through passive targeting, adsorptive


mechanisms, active targeting and receptor­mediated endocytosis,


respectively.77,78 The nanomaterials with smaller size as a foreign


objects are often not recognized by macrophages but microparticles

Free download pdf