Tissue Engineering And Nanotheranostics

(Steven Felgate) #1
b2815 Tissue Engineering and Nanotheranostics “9.61x6.69”

84 Tissue Engineering and Nanotheranostics


and store insulin.^33 However, the cells produced from this protocol


lacked definitive beta cell function as they coexpressed other hor-


mones such as glucagon. They also exhibited other functional differ-


ences from adult beta cells including lowered processing efficiency of


proinsulin and minimal C-peptide secretion response to changes in


glucose.^33 This method was later refined from a five-stage differentia-


tion to a four-stage process resulting in pancreatic endoderm and


endocrine precursors.^34


In 2007, Shim et al. demonstrated a 3D embryoid body culture


technique to derive pancreatic endodermal cells from human pluripo-


tent stem cells (hPSCs) using the sequential additions of serum,


Activin A, and retinoic acid to the culture.^35 They established that the


cells resulting from grafts transplanted into mice produced insulin,


proinsulin, C-peptide, and glucagon and rescued a hyperglycemic


state suggesting the ability to further differentiate into beta-like cells


in vivo.^35 However, the uncontrolled nature of the final differentiation


stage made it difficult to develop a definitive understanding of the


complete process directing beta cell differentiation. Jiang et al. uti-


lized a three-stage protocol and suspension culture system to derive


insulin-producing cells from hESCs.^36 Their methods employed


Activin A to produce the definitive endoderm and retinoic acid to


induce pancreatic commitment. Supplements added during the matu-


ration stage of this differentiation included bFGF and nicotinamide.^36


The resulting insulin-producing cells exhibited expression of several


beta cell markers, including Pdx1, insulin, C-peptide, glut2, gluca-


gon, and amylase, and the cells secreted insulin in response to changes


in glucose level.^36 The efficiency of this differentiation method was


reported at 15%, leaving room for optimization.^36


Two years later, Jiang et al. demonstrated that an improved ver-


sion of their differentiation protocol could be used to derive insulin


producing cells in vitro from both hESCs and iPSCs.^37 This protocol


implemented a pancreatic progenitor expansion stage by adding epi-


dermal growth factor (EGF) prior to the maturation stage, resulting


in a 25% yield of insulin-producing cells.^37 The chemically defined


protocol represented an advantage to this differentiation method;


however, improvements in efficiency would be beneficial in

Free download pdf