October 2019, ScientificAmerican.com 19JASON J. MULIKITAGetty ImagesE C O L O G YEating Away Fire
Grazing livestock reduce beneficial blazes in a sub-Saharan region
The African continent has a wide variety of habitat types, but savanna ecosystems cov-
er roughly half. And where there is savanna, there is fire. “It’s an important part of the
ecology of the system,” says University of Liverpool ecologist James R. Probert. Burning
allows grasses to dominate by keeping taller shrubs and thorn bushes from encroaching
on the landscape. Loss of grasses could push out species such as wildebeest, which are
famous for their spectacular annual migration.
A decade ago researchers attributed decreasing fires within Tanzania’s Serengeti
National Park to the recovery of wildebeest herds following an epidemic of rinderpest, a
viral disease. When millions of wildebeest gorge on grass, they remove fuel from the
landscape, making fires less frequent and less severe.
But Probert and his colleagues found that even after wildebeest populations had sta-
bilized by the mid-1990s, fires continued to decrease in the savanna-dominated Serenge-
ti-Mara ecosystem straddling the Tanzania-Kenya border (of which the protected Seren-
geti National Park is just one part). Their analysis of satellite data revealed that the region
experienced a 40 percent reduction in wildfires between 2001 and 2014—coinciding with
dramatic increases in livestock in the area. They reported their findings in July in the jour-
nal Global Change Biology.
“If you have lots of herbivores eating the grass, then you have less fire. That’s well known,”
Probert says. “But I don’t think anybody had realized the magnitude of the decline in fire
and linked it to livestock before.”
“This is a really interesting pattern,” says University of Guelph biologist John Fryxell,
who was not involved in the study. He cautions, however, that 15 years’ worth of data is
still a fairly small amount of information from which to draw definitive conclusions. “What
a short-term correlation like that suggests is there’s something interesting here that could
provide the grounds for a deeper experimental analysis,” he adds. That research could
include artificially controlling fire frequency or grazing intensity in certain areas and then
monitoring the landscape’s response over time.
Probert notes that some of these places are suffering from a kind of “tragedy of the
commons,” with livestock using up more resources than an area can sustain. He says con-
servationists might consider working with pastoralists to develop a rotational grazing
plan, thereby spreading the animals’ impact over time and space. Studies such as Prob-
ert’s continue to reveal the ways wild places like the Serengeti-Mara are inextricably
linked to human activity. — Jason G. GoldmanLivestock lessen fires in the
Serengeti-Mara ecosystem.© 2019 Scientific AmericanJASONJ. MULIKITAGetty ImagesE C O L O G YEating Away Fire
Grazing livestock reduce beneficial blazes in a sub-Saharan region
The African continent has a wide variety of habitat types, but savanna ecosystems cov-
er roughly half. And where there is savanna, there is fire. “It’s an important part of the
ecology of the system,” says University of Liverpool ecologist James R. Probert. Burning
allows grasses to dominate by keeping taller shrubs and thorn bushes from encroaching
on the landscape. Loss of grasses could push out species such as wildebeest, which are
famous for their spectacular annual migration.
A decade ago researchers attributed decreasing fires within Tanzania’s Serengeti
National Park to the recovery of wildebeest herds following an epidemic of rinderpest, a
viral disease. When millions of wildebeest gorge on grass, they remove fuel from the
landscape, making fires less frequent and less severe.
But Probert and his colleagues found that even after wildebeest populations had sta-
bilized by the mid-1990s, fires continued to decrease in the savanna-dominated Serenge-
ti-Mara ecosystem straddling the Tanzania-Kenya border (of which the protected Seren-
geti National Park is just one part). Their analysis of satellite data revealed that the region
experienced a 40 percent reduction in wildfires between 2001 and 2014—coinciding with
dramatic increases in livestock in the area. They reported their findings in July in the jour-
nal Global Change Biology.
“If you have lots of herbivores eating the grass, then you have less fire. That’s well known,”
Probert says. “But I don’t think anybody had realized the magnitude of the decline in fire
and linked it to livestock before.”
“This is a really interesting pattern,” says University of Guelph biologist John Fryxell,
who was not involved in the study. He cautions, however, that 15 years’ worth of data is
still a fairly small amount of information from which to draw definitive conclusions. “What
a short-term correlation like that suggests is there’s something interesting here that could
provide the grounds for a deeper experimental analysis,” he adds. That research could
include artificially controlling fire frequency or grazing intensity in certain areas and then
monitoring the landscape’s response over time.
Probert notes that some of these places are suffering from a kind of “tragedy of the
commons,” with livestock using up more resources than an area can sustain. He says con-
servationists might consider working with pastoralists to develop a rotational grazing
plan, thereby spreading the animals’ impact over time and space. Studies such as Prob-
ert’s continue to reveal the ways wild places like the Serengeti-Mara are inextricably
linked to human activity. — Jason G. GoldmanLivestock lessen fires in the
Serengeti-Mara ecosystem.sad1019Adva3p.indd 19 8/21/19 4:17 PM
Untitled-953 1 16/08/2019 22:28Untitled-1 1 8/22/19 9:51 AM