Jewish Philosophical Politics in Germany, 1789-1848
amelia
(Amelia)
#1
238 } Jewish Philosophical Politics in Germany
love between Rudolph and Elisabetha grows primarily through intellectual dia-
logue and Erkenntnis, not confused passion. Rudolph sheds his preconceived
notions about women’s inferior intellect and comes to respect Elisabetha as his
equal. When he becomes sure of the strength of their love, Rudolph exclaims to
Elisabetha: “You are spirit of my spirit!” (Du bist Geist von meinem Geiste!).^161
This ultimate harmonization of love and intellect is consistent with Rudolph’s
evocation, in the course of the two lovers’ growing bond, of Spinoza’s concept
of intellectual love, or happiness achieved through knowledge. In Rudolph’s
reflection, Spinozan intellectual love emerges as a viable, indeed superior, form
of romance:
Is it true that the calmly blissful sanctity of love ends if one wants to think and
know it? That is the same [as saying] that one can only believe in, but not
think and know, God; no, knowledge is God and God is love, and in knowl-
edge devotion and love are no longer exuberant fleeting moments, it [knowl-
edge] is steady and constant. Love no longer hovers unrecognizably and un-
fathomably above life as a supernatural revelation, poured out over it as the
miracle of the Holy Spirit. It is the immanent transfiguration [innewohnende
Verklärung] of every particular point out of which the circle of life, infinite yet
ever closed, is composed.^162
As charming and seductive as algebra, Spinozan intellectual love nevertheless
provides the model for Auerbach’s vision of a new sort of courtship and domes-
tic bond.
If Spinozan philosophy acts as the unlikely medium of romance, Spinoza
also remains the unifying force in Auerbach’s vision of liberal German plural-
ism. As unmistakable as Spinoza’s presence in “Liebe Menschen” is, unlike in
“Deutsche Abende: Wer ist glücklich?,” it remains unspoken. In an intriguing
instance of what we could call self-reflexive silence, however, Auerbach (silently)
remarks on Spinoza’s absence from the text. Rudolph relates his idea to Elisa-
betha of instituting a form of secular worship honoring great intellects of the
past.^163 When Elisabetha asks why he does not pursue the idea, Rudolph replies
that government authorities would not allow many of the most worthy names to
be honored, but he adds that such a ceremony is not really necessary: “Monu-
ments need not stand selfishly [egoistisch] in the open air; they must become
pillars of a great edifice, with no further demands than to help support the vault.
... If the thought, the feeling, the life of a great intellect [eines großen Geistes] in-
fuses the life and spirit of contemporaries and posterity, then he lives for all ages:
every breast he causes to swell, every heart he strengthens praises him, even if
they do not say or know his name.”^164 Rudolph’s general reflection on the virtue