Corporate Professional Today – October 20, 2018

(Ron) #1

October 20 To October 26, 2018 u Taxmann’s Corporate Professionals Today u Vol. 43 u (^33391)
Introduction



  1. This article attempts to look into the possibility of arbitrating
    oppression and mismanagement (“O&M”) disputes in India.
    Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (“Act”)
    requires a judicial authority to refer the parties to arbitration
    when an action which is the subject matter of an arbitration
    agreement is brought before it upon the party’s application.
    However, disputes relating to rights and liabilities which
    give rise to or arise out of criminal offences, matrimonial
    disputes, guardianship matters, insolvency and winding up,
    testamentary matters, etc, are generally considered to be
    outside the purview of arbitration^1. The position that arbitrators
    cannot order winding up of a company despite the existence
    of an agreement between the parties was taken by the Apex
    Court as early as 1999 in Haryana Telecom (P.) Ltd. v. Sterlite
    Industries India Ltd. [1999] 5 SCC 688. That power is conferred
    on the Court by the Companies Act.


Criteria of Arbitrability - Booz Allen dictum



  1. What can be referred to an arbitrator is only that matter
    which the arbitrator is competent to decide. The suit should be
    in respect of ‘a matter’ which the parties have agreed to refer
    and which comes within the ambit of arbitration agreement^2.
    Consequently, where a suit is commenced as to a matter which
    lies outside the arbitration agreement and is also between some
    of the parties who are not parties to the arbitration agreement,
    there is no question of application of S.8^2.
    The Supreme Court in Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. v. SBI
    Home Finance Ltd. [2011] 5 SCC 532 case sought to expound
    the concept of arbitrability.
    ‘Generally and traditionally all disputes relating to rights
    in personam are considered to be amenable to arbitration;
    and all disputes relating to rights in rem are required
    to be adjudicated by courts and public tribunals, being
    unsuited for private arbitration.’


pRiyaDaRsini tp


Arbitrating Oppression and


Mismanagement in India

Free download pdf