For example, the hydrophobic channels of a paper-based microfluidic device that
is fabricated with wax or AKD will not allow the liquid to leak unless the surface
tension of the liquid is lower than a critical value. When the surface tension of a
liquid is lower than that value (e.g., biological samples with surfactant), liquid
can penetrate not only within the hydrophilic channels but also in the hydropho-
bic areas of the device, making the device ineffective for proper liquid transport.
- Another challenge faced by researchers is how difficult it is to employ multiplex
analysis using paper microfluidics. Though, a few multiplexed sensing studies
have been performed; see Fig.6.8bfor an example. However, as the design and
shape becomes more complicated, there is the potential for cross-talk as some of
the signal reporters may diffuse to neighboring channels.
A comparison of properties of different type of microfluidic materials is given in
Table6.2.
exposed to an
artificial urine
solution containing
glucose and protein
Paper
μ-fluidic
element
Sample in
a Glucose
c
b
Lactate
Uric acid
5 mm
SPE
Fig. 6.8Examples of three detection methods for bioassays on paper-based microfluidic devices.
(a) Colorimetric detection for simultaneously detecting glucose and protein in an artificial urine
sample; (b) EC detection on a three-electrode paperfluidic device. (c) ECL detection of a sample
solution (2-(dibutylamino)-ethanol (DBAE)) [ 42 ]. Reproduced with permission from AIP
publishing LLC
6 Materials and Surfaces in Microfluidic Biosensors 159