89- Stefanidis D, et al. Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training.
Surgery. 2005;138(2):165–70. - Hiemstra E, et al. Retention of basic laparoscopic skills after a structured training program.
Gynecol Surg. 2009;6(3):229–35. - Intuitive Surgical Inc. da Vinci Residency & Fellowship Training Program. 2016. 12 Oct 2016.
- Ramos P, et al. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for
robotic training using a global assessment tool. BJU Int. 2014;113(5):836–42. - Simulated Surgical Systems LLC. RoSS II robotic surgery simulator; 2017. 3/14/2017.
- DiMaio S, Hasser C. The da Vinci research interface. In: MICCAI Workshop on Systems and
Arch. for Computer Assisted Interventions, Midas Journal; 2008. - Kumar R, et al. Assessing system operation skills in robotic surgery trainees. Int J Med Robot.
2012;8(1):118–24. - Lin HC, et al. Towards automatic skill evaluation: detection and segmentation of robot-assisted
surgical motions. Comput Aided Surg. 2006;11(5):220–30. - McDonough PS, et al. Initial validation of the ProMIS surgical simulator as an objective mea-
sure of robotic task performance. J Robot Surg. 2011;5(3):195–9. - Brand TC. Educational curricula, simulation, and skills assessment for the da Vinci platform,
in Society of Government Service Urologists, San Diego. 2015. - Jonsson MN, et al. ProMIS can serve as a da Vinci(R) simulator – a construct validity study. J
Endourol. 2011;25(2):345–50. - Tausch TJ, et al. Content and construct validation of a robotic surgery curriculum using an
electromagnetic instrument tracker. J Urol. 2012;188(3):919–23. - Chmarra MK, et al. The influence of experience and camera holding on laparoscopic instrument
movements measured with the TrEndo tracking system. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(11):2069–75. - D’Angelo A-LD, et al. Idle time: an underdeveloped performance metric for assessing surgical
skill. Am J Surg. 2015;209(4):645–51. - Crochet P, et al. Development of an evidence-based training program for laparoscopic hyster-
ectomy on a virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31(6):2474-2482. - Martin JA, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical resi-
dents. Br J Surg. 1997;84:273–8. - Gallagher AG, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skills and checklist scales
reliability compared for high stakes assessments. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84(7–8):568–73. - Datta V, et al. The surgical efficiency score: a feasible, reliable, and valid method of skills
assessment. Am J Surg. 2006;192(3):372–8. - Dath D, et al. Toward reliable operative assessment: the reliability and feasibility of videotaped
assessment of laparoscopic technical skills. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(12):1800–4. - Vassiliou MC, et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic
skills. Am J Surg. 2005;190(1):107–13. - Kramp KH, et al. Validity and reliability of global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS)
in novice trainees performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(2):351–8. - Gumbs AA, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL. Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using
global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(2):308–13. - Hogle NJ, et al. Evaluation of surgical fellows’ laparoscopic performance using Global
Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS). Surg Endosc. 2014;28(4):1284–90. - Vassiliou MC, et al. Evaluating intraoperative laparoscopic skill: direct observation versus
blinded videotaped performances. Surg Innov. 2007;14(3):211–6. - Chang L, et al. Reliable assessment of laparoscopic performance in the operating room using
videotape analysis. Surg Innov. 2007;14(2):122–6. - Watanabe Y, et al. Psychometric properties of the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic
Skills (GOALS) using item response theory. Am J Surg. 2016;213(2):273–6. - Goh AC, et al. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assess-
ment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol. 2012;187(1):247–52. - Hung AJ, et al. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training meth-
ods. BJU Int. 2013;112(6):864–71.
5 Performance Assessment in Minimally Invasive Surgery