92 ■ I: HISTORICAL AND THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR ROLE DELINEATION
■ APRN PRACTICE OUTCOMES
Compelling evidence of the effectiveness of APRN- managed care has been in the litera-
ture since the 1970s (Lenz, Mundinger, Kane, Hopkins, & Lin, 2004). A variety of patient
outcomes of APRN- provided care have been studied, primarily in comparison to that
provided by physicians. Patient satisfaction with, and quality outcomes of, APRN care
have been studied extensively in the United States across the past three decades, and
more recently in Canada, Britain and other European countries that have adopted
advanced practice/ NP roles. Satisfaction with the quality of NP- provided care in pri-
mary care, emergency departments, and specialty- care settings have consistently been
found to be high, while researchers acknowledge that various methods, definitions,
instruments, data sets, and time frames have been used in the measurement of these
outcomes. However, across multiple studies and reviews, findings consistently docu-
mented quality of, and patient satisfaction with, APRN- provided care to be equivalent
to or higher than physician- provided care (Carter & Chochinov, 2007; Cooper, Lindsay,
Kinn, & Swann, 2002; Dierick- van Daele, Metsemakers, Derckx, Spreeuwenberg, &
Vrijhoef, 2009; Horrocks, Anderson, & Salisbury, 2002; Jennings, Lee, Chao, & Keating,
2009; Kleinpell, Ely, & Grabenkort, 2008; Knudtson, 2000; Roblin, Becker, Adams,
Howard, & Roberts, 2004). For example, Mundinger and associates’ large randomized
controlled trial of NP- provided primary care, compared with physician- provided care,
with a 2- year follow- up, demonstrated no significant differences in patient satisfaction,
Authors Design Related Findings
Roots and
McDonald (2014)
Descriptive,
qualitative, case
study
NPs added to rural Canadian fee for service
practices; extended access and appointment
times, emphasis on team approach, increased
satisfaction, increased connection to community
services for patients
Sawatsky, Christie,
and Singal (2013)
Randomized trial NP- directed care after cardiac surgery more likely
to result in higher rating of functional status and
fewer reported symptoms, higher satisfaction with
amount and quality of services received
Van Leuven and
Prion (2007)
Descriptive,
naturalistic
Interview NPs for perspectives on health
promotion activities in practice; health promotion
viewed as implicit in nursing role; differentiates
NP from MD; valued by NPs; obstacles: time,
patient care needs, limitations of scope of practice,
patient scheduling, practice model (HMO vs.
other practice)
CBI , Caring Behaviors Inventory; CNS, clinical nurse specialist; COPE, creativity, optimism, planning, and
expert information; HMO, health maintenance organization; NP, nurse practitioner; PNP, PhD in nursing program.
Sources : Benkert et al. (2002); Benkert, Hollie, Nordstrom, Wickson, and Bins- Emerick (2009); Castro and Ruiz
(2009); Donohue (2003); Green and Davis (2005); Hayes (2007); Kotzer (2005); Kozlowski, Lusk, and Melnyk
(2015); Roots and McDonald, 2014; Sawatsky, Christie, and Singal (2013); Van Leuven and Prion (2007).
TABLE 3.1 Sample of Studies Examining Influence of Disciplinary Underpinnings on
NP Practice Outcomes (continued )