loss in quality occurring during the initial
stages of domestication. Such a pattern sug-
gests investment in improving the rearing
conditions so that the selection that results in
an excessive loss of quality is reduced.
In a captive environment, we can expect
the ‘domesticated’ stock (Fig. 6.1) to be rela-
tively stable. However, over time, we would
expect the accumulated effects of inbreeding
to result in a slow general decline that
reduces both quantity and quality (the lower
part of the curves shown in Fig. 6.1).
Genetic Change due to Captive Rearing
Most of the studies of genetic change occur-
ring in captive-reared populations have been
on the tephritid fruit flies used in SIT. These
studies are useful because they illustrate the
dramatic changes that occur when insects are
intensively cultured to produce very large
numbers. There is no reason to believe that
the data from fruit flies are unusual. Genetic
changes are inevitable whenever a genetically
variable population is reared in a novel envi-
ronment. Natural selection will act and adap-
tation to the new environment will occur.
Mating behaviour
One very common adaptation to captive
rearing is earlier mating and oviposition (e.g.
melon fly: Miyatake, 1998; medfly: Rössler,
1975; Wong and Nakahara, 1978; Vargas and
Carey, 1989; oriental fruit fly: Foote and
Carey, 1987; tobacco budworm: Raulston,
1975). The time scale of this adaptation is
quite rapid. Using a wild-caught population
of tobacco budworm, Raulston (1975) found
that, after seven generations of captive rear-
ing, the shift to the domesticated pattern of
early mating was almost complete.
More complex changes in mating behav-
iour may also occur. Haeger and O’Meara
(1970) showed that the captive rearing of the
mosquito Culex nigripalpusresulted from a
shift in female behaviour. The mating success
of colony females was about 70%, regardless
of whether the males were from the colony or
from the wild; however, under similar condi-
76 L. Nunney
log (quantity)
log (quantity)
log (quality)
log (quality)
Wild
population
Wild population
and optimum
strategy
Optimum
strategy
Domesticated
stock
Domesticated
stock
Fig. 6.1.The expected trade-off between the
numbers produced in mass rearing (quantity) and
field performance (quality). The solid curve defines
the trade-off. The natural (wild) population is
arbitrarily placed at the origin and the position of a
population adapted to the captive-rearing facility
over many generations (domesticated stock) is
shown. The region of the trade-off curve below the
point of domestication defines decreasing quality
and quantity, due to the effect of long-term
inbreeding depression. The dashed lines link
combinations of quality and quantity that are
equally effective (as defined by equation 1). The
upper graph shows a trade-off curve with an
optimum strategy of partial domestication; the lower
graph shows a curve with no such optimum – the
best strategy is to minimize domestication.