Cropping Systems: Applications, Management and Impact

(nextflipdebug5) #1
Table 5. MNL results of factors influencing male cassava farmers’ choice of adaptation strategies in the study area

Independent
variables

Mulching and soil
conservation

Planting covers crops and
trees

Use of acclimated crop
varieties

Changing planting and
harvest time

No adaptation

Coefficient P-level Coefficient P-level Coefficient P-level Coefficient P-level Coefficient P-
level
Cassava farm size 0.2003 0.191 - 0.184 0.302 - 0.201 - 0.400 0.028 0.733 - 0.079 0.804
Cassava farm
income


  • 2.521 0.241 0.092** 0.000 4.722 0.413 1.171 0.386 4.029 0.077


Land owner-ship 0.506 1.000 - 12.82*** 0.000 - 28.41 0.877 - 13.92 ...... 13.52*** 0.000
Cassava farming
experience

0.312 0.765 - 1.988 0.743 - 0.873 0.773 1.65 0.699 - 2.231 0.700

Access to credit 1.0332 0.521 3.14 0.014 3.43 0.046 1.882 0.776 2.441 0.0620
Constant - 1.189 1.000 12.224 0.000 2.022 0.966 15.893 0.000 15.652 0.000
Diagno-stics Irrigation system
Base category 20.646
LR chi square 47.072
Nagel-kerke 0.234
, , = significant at 1, 5 and 10% probability level respectively.
Source: Computed from field survey, 2015.

Free download pdf