Table 5. MNL results of factors influencing male cassava farmers’ choice of adaptation strategies in the study areaIndependent
variablesMulching and soil
conservationPlanting covers crops and
treesUse of acclimated crop
varietiesChanging planting and
harvest timeNo adaptationCoefficient P-level Coefficient P-level Coefficient P-level Coefficient P-level Coefficient P-
level
Cassava farm size 0.2003 0.191 - 0.184 0.302 - 0.201 - 0.400 0.028 0.733 - 0.079 0.804
Cassava farm
income- 2.521 0.241 0.092** 0.000 4.722 0.413 1.171 0.386 4.029 0.077
Land owner-ship 0.506 1.000 - 12.82*** 0.000 - 28.41 0.877 - 13.92 ...... 13.52*** 0.000
Cassava farming
experience0.312 0.765 - 1.988 0.743 - 0.873 0.773 1.65 0.699 - 2.231 0.700Access to credit 1.0332 0.521 3.14 0.014 3.43 0.046 1.882 0.776 2.441 0.0620
Constant - 1.189 1.000 12.224 0.000 2.022 0.966 15.893 0.000 15.652 0.000
Diagno-stics Irrigation system
Base category 20.646
LR chi square 47.072
Nagel-kerke 0.234
, , = significant at 1, 5 and 10% probability level respectively.
Source: Computed from field survey, 2015.