Computational Drug Discovery and Design

(backadmin) #1

  1. Procacci P (2016) Reformulating the entropic
    contribution of molecular docking scoring
    functions. J Comput Chem 37:1819–1827

  2. Gilson MK, Zhou HX (2007) Calculation of
    protein-ligand binding affinities. Annu Rev
    Biophys Biomol Struct 36:21–42

  3. Bello M, Martı ́nez-Archundia M, Correa-
    Basurto J (2013) Automated docking for
    novel drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Dis-
    cov 8:821–834

  4. Bodnarchuck MS (2016) Water, water, every-
    where...It’s time to stop and think. Drug
    Discov Today 21:1139–1146

  5. Mysinger MM, Schoichet BK (2010) Rapid
    context-dependent ligand desolvation in
    molecular docking. J Chem Inf Model
    50:1561–1573

  6. Ge H, Wang Y, Li C et al (2013) Molecular
    dynamics-based virtual screening: accelerating
    the drug discovery process by high-
    performance computing. J Chem Inf Model
    53:2757–2764

  7. Wang L, Wu Y, Deng Y et al (2015) Accurate
    and reliable prediction of relative ligand bind-
    ing potency in prospective drug discovery by
    way of a modern free-energy calculation proto-
    col and force field. J Am Chem Soc
    137:2695–2703

  8. Lavechia A (2015) Machine-learning
    approaches in drug discovery: methods and
    applications. Drug Discov Today 20:318–331

  9. Lemmen C, Zimmermann M, Lengauer T
    (2002) Multiple molecular superpositioning
    as an effective tool for virtual database screen-
    ing. In: Klebe G (ed) Virtual screening: an
    alternative or complement to high-throughput
    screening? 1st edn. Kluwer Academic Publish-
    ers, Marburg

  10. Kristensen TG, Nielsen J, Pedersen CNS
    (2013) Methods for similarity-based virtual
    screening. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 5:
    e201302009

  11. Talevi A, Bruno-Blanch LE (2016) Virtual
    screening applications in the search of novel
    antiepileptic drug candidates. In: Talevi A,
    Rocha L (eds) Antiepileptic drug discovery.
    Novel Approaches. Humana Press, New York

  12. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Dror O, Inbar Y,
    Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2008) Deterministic
    pharmacophore detection via multiple flexible
    alignment of drug-like molecules. J Comput
    Biol 15:737–754

  13. Cottrell SJ, Gillet VJ, Taylor R, Wilton DJ
    (2004) Generation of multiple pharmacophore
    hypothesis using multiobjective optimization
    techniques. J Comput Aided Mol Des
    18:665–682
    37. Pirhadi S, Shiri F, Ghasemi JB (2013) Methods
    and applications of structure based pharmaco-
    phores in drug discovery. Curr Top Med Chem
    13:1036–1047
    38. Zhang Q, Muegge I (2006) Scaffold hopping
    through virtual screening using 2D and 3D
    similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and con-
    sensus scoring. J Med Chem 9:1536–1548
    39. Kru ̈ger DM, Evers A (2010) Comparison of
    structure- and ligand-based virtual screening
    protocols considering hit list complementarity
    and enrichment factors. ChemMedChem
    5:148–158
    40. Talevi A, Gavernet L, Bruno-Blanch LE (2009)
    Combined virtual screening strategies. Curr
    Comput Aided Drug Des 5:23–37
    41. Pouliot M, Jeanmart S (2016) Pan assay inter-
    ference compounds (PAINS) and other pro-
    miscuous compounds in antifungal research. J
    Med Chem 59:497–503
    42. Walters WP, Stahl MT, Murcko MA (1998)
    Virtual screening – an overview. Drug Discov
    Today 3:160–178
    43. Zhu T, Cao S, Su PC, Patel R, Shah D, Chokshi
    HB, Szukala R, Johnson ME, Hevener KE
    (2013) Hit identification and optimization in
    virtual screening: practical recommendations
    based upon a critical literature analysis. J Med
    Chem 56:6560–6572
    44. Ripphausen P, Nisius B, Pletason L, Bajorath J
    (2010) Quo vadis, virtual screening? A com-
    prehensive survey of prospective applications. J
    Med Chem 53:8461–8467
    45. Neetoo-Isseliee Z, MacKenzie AE,
    Southern C, Jerman J, McIver EG, Harries N,
    Taylor DL, Milligan G (2013) High-
    throughput identification and characterization
    of novel, species-selective GPR35 agonists. J
    Pharmacol Exp Ther 344:568–578
    46. Kola I, Landis J (2004) Can the pharmaceutical
    industry reduce attrition rates? Nature Rev
    Drug Discov 3:711–716
    47. Schuster D, Laggner C, Langer T (2005) Why
    drugs fail – a study on side effects in new
    chemical entities. Curr Pharm Des
    11:3545–3559
    48. Talevi A (2016) Computatonal approaches for
    innovative antiepileptic drug discovery. Expert
    Opin Drug Discov 11:1001–1016
    49. Brown N, Lewis RA (2006) Exploiting QSAR
    methods in lead optimization. Curr Opin Drug
    Discov Devel 9:419–424
    50. Wong WWL, Burkowski FJ (2009) A construc-
    tive approach for discovering new drug leads:
    using a kernel methodology for the inverse-
    QSAR problem. J Cheminform 1:4


18 Alan Talevi

Free download pdf