Rodent Societies: An Ecological & Evolutionary Perspective

(Greg DeLong) #1

the Hystricognaths, but the variance within the family
Bathyergidae does not appear to correlate with the degree
of sociality (see Faulkes et al. 1997).


Social evolution: Proximate factors


The maintenance of highly social behavior in the Bathyer-
gidae has also received much attention, and was again ini-
tiated in studies of the naked mole-rat. An increasing body
of work is now revealing that the proximate mechanisms
underlying the characteristic reproductive division of labor
(reproductive skew) differ among mole-rat species. In par-
ticular, there is debate about the exact role the breeding fe-
male plays in maintaining optimal levels of reproductive
skew. Theoretical models of incomplete control by domi-
nants (Clutton-Brock 1998a) and concession theory, involv-
ing peace and staying incentives (Keller and Reeve 1994;
Reeve et al. 1998) have been proposed to explain both inter-
and intraspecific differences in reproductive skew among
animals. However, implicit in both models is the notion that
the dominant breeder exerts, or attempts to exert, some
kind of reproductive control over subordinate nonbreeders
in the group. This control could manifest itself in different
ways, ranging from infanticide of subordinates’ offspring
or interference by dominants with subordinates’ mating at-
tempts, to actual suppression of subordinates’ reproductive
physiology (Faulkes and Abbott 1997). If most mole-rats
live in extended family groups, incest avoidance alone could
be sufficient to maintain reproductive skew, as the only
unrelated individuals in the group would be the breeding
pair (Jarvis and Bennett 1993; Bennett et al. 1994, 1997;
Burda 1995; Cooney and Bennett 2000; Faulkes and Ben-
nett 2001). Almost all animals have evolved mechanisms
that prevent them from breeding with close relatives be-
cause of the fitness costs of harmful recessive traits and de-
creased heterozygosity that might be manifest in offspring
arising from such mating (Pusey and Wolf 1996).
All cooperatively breeding mole-rats studied to date have
unequal reproduction, with a single female normally breed-
ing with one, but on occasion two or three breeding males
(Faulkes et al. 1997; Bishop et al. 2004; Burland et al. 2004).
However, skew in terms of lifetime reproductive success
may differ considerably between species. The social mole-
rats studied so far in the genusCryptomysall have a mating
system that involves obligate outbreeding, whereas naked
mole-rats are unusual within the family and among mam-
mals in general because they may inbreed to a high degree.
These incestuous tendencies were originally proposed as
an important factor in explaining their eusociality, and
that inbreeding produced a within-kin group genetic struc-
ture analogous to haplodiploidy in the Hymenoptera, with


intracolony relatedness estimated in some groups at 0.8
(Reeve et al. 1990). This estimate of relatedness is actually
greater than the average three-quarter relatedness in hap-
lodiploid organisms where the queen is singly mated (Ham-
ilton 1964).
Although the inclusive fitness benefits of high related-
ness to nonbreeding colony members are readily apparent,
the puzzle remains that field data from other cooperatively
breeding mammals, including other social mole-rat species,
follow the typical pattern of incest avoidance. In the Dama-
raland mole-rat, mean within-colony relatedness has been
estimated at 0.46 (Burland et al. 2002), indicating that nor-
mal familial levels of relatedness are sufficient for highly
social behavior to evolve for a given cost /benefit ratio for
such behavior (average relatedness for first order relatives
is 0.50). It appears that inbreeding might be a derived trait
peculiar to the naked mole-rat, which may have evolved
as an adaptive response to the high costs of dispersal. De-
spite the potential costs of inbreeding, once deleterious re-
cessive traits were purged from a population, inbreeders
would have had an advantage over obligate outbreeders,
who could potentially suffer fitness costs if opportunities
for finding unrelated mates were rare. Without incestuous
mating, colonies in which a breeder dies could face extinc-
tion before sufficient (unpredictable) rainfall facilitates em-
igration. The lack of inbreeding avoidance, together with
genetic studies of wild-caught colonies, indicates that suc-
cessful dispersal in naked mole-rats is infrequent (Reeve
et al. 1990; Faulkes et al. 1997). More recently, mark-
recapture data from field studies have supported the con-
tention that dispersal is highly risky. Twenty out of twenty-
one nascent colonies that contained one to four immigrants
from nearby colonies went extinct within a year (O’Riain
and Braude 2001), despite the fact that other field and lab-
oratory data suggest outbreeding may be the preferred mat-
ing system if the opportunity arises (Clarke and Faulkes
1999; Braude 2000; Cisek 2000).
Given that naked mole-rats will quite readily inbreed, the
reproductive monopoly of the queen must be maintained
by active means, and nonbreeders of both sexes within col-
onies are physiologically suppressed by the queen. In fe-
males, ovarian cyclicity and ovulation are blocked, whereas
in males most nonbreeders have spermatozoa within the re-
productive tract that are both reduced in number and lack
normal levels of motility. In both sexes, reduced secretion of
the pituitary gonadotrophin luteinizing hormone is evident.
These extreme (but reversible) reproductive blocks are sug-
gested to be brought about by physical threats and aggres-
sion from the dominant breeding queen (Faulkes and Ab-
bott 1993; 1997). Unlike the facultative inbreeding of the
naked mole-rat, the eusocial Damaraland mole-rat is an ob-

African Mole-Rats: Social and Ecological Diversity 435
Free download pdf