The Times - UK (2022-05-26)

(Antfer) #1
the times | Thursday May 26 2022 2GM 39

Business


Covid loans


ence in Birmingham. “I has been reluc-
tant to do so” but “the clock is ticking”.
The bank has claimed that data pro-
tection laws mean taxpayers should not
be told who benefited from the loans
and that a database of beneficiaries of
state assistance could give rise to “in-
formal, almost vigilante activity”.
Last month, MPs on the Treasury
committee described these justifica-
tions as “extraordinary”.
George Havenhand, of Spotlight on
Corruption, said: “It’s no coincidence
that those with the most insight into the
government’s handling of the Covid
loan schemes are calling most loudly
for transparency.”
A spokesman for the business bank
said: “Legislation places restrictions on
the processing of personal data and we
do not consider that its requirements
would be met in the publishing of a list
of all businesses that have received a
scheme loan.”

400p

300

200

100

0
2020 2021 2022

Mar 13, 2020
Pandemic fears
cause sell-off

Nov 4, 2020
M&S records first
loss in its history

May 25, 2022
Rowe bows out saying
M&S has fundamentally
changed

Aug 20, 2021
Surprise profit upgrade

which delivers 400,000 orders a
week, typically has more affluent
customers but its warning shows
that it is not immune to challenges.
Despite the slowdown in sales,
Ocado Retail is still adding to its
portfolio of warehouses to allow it to
serve more M&S customers across
the country. Despite being the UK’s
only pure online grocer, its capacity
is dwarfed by Tesco and Asda, which
both deliver more than one million
orders a week.
Analysts noted that Ocado’s
bearish outlook was in stark
contrast to its confident forecasts
during the height of the pandemic,
and even three months ago, when

Sparks boss leaves a


problem for heirs


J


ust what Britain’s skint
shoppers need: a three-for-
one offer from Marks &
Spencer. Steve Rowe, the
retailer’s boss, is off, bowing
out with the full-year figures. His
replacement? Three different
people. Was Rowe really that good?
Yes, it’s a tribute of sorts to the
M&S lifer who took charge in April
2016, having joined as a Saturday
boy in 1983 at the Croydon store.
But his exit invites an inescapable
question. Are his trio of successors
— chief executive Stuart Machin,
co-chief executive and clothing
supremo Katie Bickerstaffe and
chief strategy & finance officer Eoin
Tonge — really inheriting a
business in far better shape?
Glance at the share price and it’s
not exactly obvious. It was about
400p when Rowe climbed into the
big M&S frock in April 2016. Now?
Just 138¾p, up 5 per cent on the
results. Hardly a vote of confidence
from the market. Even so, it would
be unfair to judge Rowe purely on
that metric — something he hints at
himself when he talks of “tackling
the underlying issues that had
eroded the strength of the business”
and handing over a group that has
“fundamentally changed”.
In a stint punctuated by Covid,
Rowe has made lots of good calls.
On the togs front, he cut ranges by
a fifth, focusing instead on buying
“popular lines” in “greater depth”.
He weaned shoppers off price
promotions — halved in clothing to
18 per cent and in food to 15 per
cent — replacing discounts with
lower prices that stuck. He doubled
output at the Castle Donington
distribution centre, without a repeat
of past delivery screw-ups, while
using the pandemic to build a far
bigger online presence. He brought
M&S food delivery clout, paying
£750 million for half of Ocado’s
retail business: a deal cleverly timed
for corona. And he shut 68 of M&S’s
underperforming bigger stores.
The latest figures show progress,
too. Pre-tax profits of £392 million,
reversing last time’s £209 million
losses, are the best since 2016. Food
sales grew 10.1 per cent. Clothing was
up 3.8 per cent and by 55.6 per cent
online. And the net debt that Rowe
inherited, excluding leases, is down
from £1.8 billion to £420 million.
M&S now delivers decent free cash-
flow: up from £296 million to £699
million last year. The board, chaired
by Archie Norman, may reinstate a
dividend, too.
Rowe’s even cut back on his
“transformation” talk: a word he
used only 21 times in the latest
results versus 29 times in 2021’s and
44 times in 2020’s. Is that a sign
M&S is finally more transformed?
Still, maybe there’s another reason
that his progress is yet to show up in
the share price, trading at just 8.8
times forward earnings on forecasts
from house broker Shore Capital.
And it’s not just that profits will be
lower this year — hit by the
inflationary squeeze on consumers,
M&S’s Russia exit and the absence
of £59.8 million of business rates
relief it should have handed back.
No, it’s that results on Rowe’s
watch have been flattered by
incessant “adjusting items”: so-
called one-off costs. They tot up to

more than £2.1 billion. Or only
£500 million less than M&S’s market
value. Happily, the latest adjusters
are the lowest yet: £131 million. But
Rowe’s trio of successors needs to
produce cleaner numbers. A fitter
M&S should focus on dressing up
the customers — not the figures.

Doing right by SSE


E


ven Rishi Sunak can’t have
missed this: full-year results
from energy outfit SSE, laced
with reasons not to hit it with a
windfall tax (report, page 42). There
was a line about the “increasingly
supportive UK policy environment”
following last month’s publication of
the government’s “energy security
strategy”: one the chancellor can’t
want to undermine with a kneejerk
levy? Then, a reminder that SSE “is
one of the UK’s biggest taxpayers”:
“16th out of the 100 group of
companies” on PwC figures.
Plus, of course, the pledge from
chief executive Alistair Phillips-
Davies to invest £25 billion this
decade into “vital UK and Ireland
infrastructure, creating thousands of
jobs and directly addressing the
energy crisis in the longer term”.
That’s up from £12.5 billion over five
years, with four-fifths split between
wind farms and electricity networks
and the rest on newer green stuff —
carbon capture, hydro and pumped
storage. As he put it: “We are
investing significantly more than we
are making in profits”.
Isn’t that what the government
wants? Yes, operating profits rose
15 per cent to £1.54 billion, including
a 91 per cent jump from its five gas-
fired power plants to £306 million
— boosted by the spike in wholesale
prices. But renewables profits fell by
22 per cent to £568 million, partly
hurt by “exceptionally still and dry”
summer weather. And SSE is a
microcosm of the challenge facing
Sunak: how to devise a tax that
captures windfall gains without
hurting the green investment
Britain needs? He must know it’s an
impossible task. Still, having fallen
8 per cent on Tuesday’s tax talk,
SSE shares rebounded 6 per cent to
£18.68. Sunak’s left the markets even
more confused than him.

Cowgill’s red card


A


row over his £3 million bonus.
An investigation into
suspected price-fixing shirts.
And a £4.3 million fine after being
caught in a car park with the boss of
Footasylum: a £90 million
acquisition that the competition
regulator had ordered him to sell.
The hat-trick of own goals has
caught up with Peter Cowgill, the
JD Sports boss turfed out with
“immediate effect”, apparently by
the controlling Rubin family. It’s a
sour end for the man who’s built the
athleisure outfit since 2004, turning
it into a FTSE-100 stock. But, even if
the shares are up more than tenfold,
they’ve halved in six months to 112p
— down 6 per cent on his exit. You
doubt he’d be going so quick if JD
didn’t fear more governance goofs.

[email protected]

business commentary Alistair Osborne


bosses suggested the crisis had led
to a permanent shift to online
grocery shopping. Before the
pandemic, online accounted for
7 per cent share of the UK’s food
market, That doubled to 14 per cent
when people were stuck at home
during lockdowns, but Ocado said
that figure had slipped back to about
11 or 12 per cent of the market.
Despite the lowering of forecasts,
shares in Ocado Group rose by 4½p,
or 0.6 per cent, to close at 769½p.
The stock has lost two thirds of its
value in a year after being caught in
a wider technology sell-off as
investors questioned the future
success of “pandemic winners”.

Frasers loses


a few bob on


sale of cheap


stores in US


Frasers Group, which recently promot-
ed founder Mike Ashley’s son-in-law as
chief executive, is selling Bob’s Stores
and Eastern Mountain Sports for
$70 million to GoDigital Media Group
(Ashley Armstrong writes).
The company bought the two dis-
count sporting goods chains out of
bankruptcy for $101 million in 2017, in
a move that pushed Frasers, then
known as Sports Direct, into the US for
the first time. However, it announced
last August that it would be launching a
strategic review of Bob’s Stores after
Nike said that it would close a string of
wholesale accounts including Bob’s.
Partly as a result of Nike’s refusal to
supply it, Frasers has taken a $30 mil-
lion hit offloading the business.
Frasers Group, which has been at-
tempting to move away from Sports Di-
rect’s former bargain basement reputa-
tion, said that Bob’s Stores estate did
not fit with the “elevation” strategy
adopted by Murray, who took over as
chief executive this month.
The company has in the past had a
tense relationship with Adidas and
Nike, because it frequently heavily dis-
counted items in order to gain market
share and put pressure on its rivals.
However, in recent years the hang-
over of Ashley’s tensions with the
sports brands has hurt Frasers Group,
as they prioritised supply to JD Sports,
its archrival.
To counter this, Murray has been fo-
cused on rolling out high end Flannels
stores, including a large store on
London’s Oxford Street selling £630
Valentino sandals and £2,250 Dolce
and Gabbana dresses, partly to demon-
strate that Frasers can look after even
expensive brands. He has also invested
in bigger Sports Direct stores, including
a recent opening in Birmingham.
Murray married Anna Ashley, Ash-
ley’s daughter, at ceremony at Blen-
heim Palace, Oxfordshire, two weeks
ago. The former nightclub promoter
joined the business in 2016 initially to
oversee Frasers’ property before been
given a bigger “head of elevation role”
and became chief executive at the start
of this month.
Frasers Group is expected to an-
nounce its results in July after blaming
constraints in the audit industry for
delaying its results for the third time in
four years.

Inquiry into tech firm deal


The acquisition of Britain’s biggest
microchip factory by a Chinese-owned
technology company last summer has
been called in for a landmark full
national security assessment after
pressure from politicians in the United
States (David Byers writes).
Kwasi Kwarteng, the business secre-
tary, said the government would exam-
ine whether the takeover of Newport
Wafer Fab in Wales by Nexperia, a sub-
sidiary of the Chinese smartphone
manufacturer Wingtech Technology,
would be a threat to national security.
“There will now be a full assessment
under the new National Security and
Investment Act,” Kwarteng said on
Twitter yesterday evening, announcing
the investigation. “We welcome over-
seas investment, but it must not threat-
en Britain’s national security.”
It is the first time the government has
deployed the act, which was passed last
year, to call in a takeover for review.

Ministers have 30 working days to
carry out their assessment and have the
power to intervene to reverse it.
The intervention came after The
Times reported that nine US congress-
men including Michael McCaul, the
lead Republican on the House foreign
affairs committee, had signed a letter
last month demanding “urgent action”
to overturn the acquisition.
They said the takeover “serves as a
critical test case” of Britain’s willingness
to “address a shared security concern
regarding critical technology”.
An analysis of Wingtech’s sharehold-
ers by Datenna, an investment screen-
ing specialist, found it was heavily
backed by the Chinese Communist
Party, according to a committee report.
Newport Wafer Fab makes slices of
semiconductors, the fundamental
components of electronic devices. It is
Britain’s biggest microchip plant and
employs 450 people.
Free download pdf