The Times - UK (2022-05-27)

(Antfer) #1
26 Friday May 27 2022 | the times

Comment


are doing as everyone is too focused
on their own business.
I was a victim of a random crime
that I’d never heard of but is
apparently common. Catalytic
converters of older cars especially
are worth money because they
contain platinum. Nothing to do with
the Queen’s jubilee, by the way,
though you do wonder.

Royal blessing


A


s it happens I saw the
Queen this week. She
visited the Chelsea Flower
Show on Monday, riding along in
a golf cart-type vehicle that
was immediately dubbed the
Maj-mobile. Her route
took her down the
main avenue with all
the big show
gardens. She
stopped — truly a
vision in pink —
and chatted to
Joe Swift about
his bee garden
(buzz buzz).
She then
rode
slowly
by my
Wild Kitchen Garden,
chatting away to the
RHS president, Keith
Weed, (his real name) about
container gardening. I swear I heard

her say the word “pretty” about mine
before stopping to have a chat with
the balcony gardener Jason Williams,
known as the Cloud Gardener, who
usually tends his wonderfully
colourful array of plants on the 18th
floor of a Manchester tower block. It
was all rather thrilling.

Podium finish


I


won’t pretend that I
wasn’t nervous on
Tuesday when the
medals were given
out. You have to be
prepared for
anything but I am
pleased to report
that the Wild
Kitchen Garden
received a “silver
gilt”, which is just
one down from
gold. I did emit a
shriek of happiness
(American behaviour).
Thank you also to all the
many readers who stopped
by for a chat about wild
edibles. Clearly many of
you love, as I do, getting
your hands dirty.

Turtle rain


T


he weather
has been
shocking.
On Tuesday raindrops the size of

T


he “build” for my container
garden at Chelsea felt
almost like an extreme
sport and my daily step
count (in steel-toecapped
boots) was way over 10,000. At the
end of the day, I must admit to a
certain weariness. This was exactly
the case when I slumped thankfully
into my car at 8pm one night last
week at Woodside Park Tube station
to head back to my flat.
“VROOM!! VROOM!!” I jumped
out of my skin. My VW Beetle
suddenly sounded like a Ferrari in a
Formula One race. What was going
on? Had the exhaust fallen off? Had
I hit a pothole?
The answer came at Kwik Fit the
next day at 8.30am. “Your catalytic
converter has been stolen,” said the
mechanic, showing me the gap
underneath the car. My what?
Apparently thieves have to jack up
the car to steal it but, in a car park,
no one stops to ask them what they

Comedy is our weapon against woke absurdity


Despite the predictable outrage of trans activists, Ricky Gervais’s tirade is funny because it’s true


ideology can hardly be described as
“punching down”.
Why should comedy have rules
anyway? Increasingly, comedians are
expected to sign waivers promising
not to offend. But if explaining a
punchline kills a joke then political
purity tests are the firing squad
before a comedian ever makes it on
stage. Somewhere along the line we
have lost our sense of humour.
Gervais opens SuperNature with a
caveat that many of his remarks will
be ironic. He explains: “That’s when I
say something I don’t really mean,
for comic effect, and you, as an
audience, you laugh at the wrong
thing because you know what the
right thing is. It’s a way of satirising
attitudes.” He also reminds the
audience that comedians act in
character on stage and it is the
character, not the comedian, that
says outrageous things. These things
should not need explaining. But the
response to Jimmy Carr’s joke about
Gypsies earlier this year suggests
explanations are indeed required.
The fact is, both offence and humour
are subjective. If you don’t find
something funny, the best advice is
not to watch.
Fortunately for the rest of us,
Gervais is still free to say what he
likes on Netflix. As he frequently
reminds us, he’s an incredibly
wealthy man and this makes him
uncancellable. But the freedom to
ridicule woke orthodoxies should not
be the sole preserve of the rich.

Joanna Williams is the founder of the
think tank Cieo

Emma Duncan is away

have been nothing remotely funny
about saying only a man has a penis.
It was a straightforward biological
fact. It is only when it is prohibited to
say such things that they have the
power to shock. In puncturing
pomposity, Gervais is part of a great
comedic tradition.
But rather than roll their eyes at
Gervais, activists have taken the bait.
A spokesperson for the National
Center for Transgender Equality in
the US said Gervais perpetuated
“dehumanising myths about
transgender people”, which could
“give people permission to
discriminate, harass and even
commit violence”. This suggests that
new orthodoxies about gender
should be afforded special protection
and marked as off-limits to
comedians. This would spell the end
of free speech in comedy.
One rule has it that comedians
must only “punch up” and Gervais
transgressed by poking fun at a
minority group. But it wasn’t
transgender people Gervais was
making the target of his jokes but
transgender ideology — new beliefs
about gender fluidity and the
importance of declaring our
pronouns at every available
opportunity. As I explore in my book
How Woke Won, this ideology has
been adopted wholesale by the
police, the civil service, the education
sector and even the NHS.
Challenging it can mean you end up
in court, like Allison Bailey or Maya
Forstater; or are visited by the police,
like Harry Miller; or, like JK
Rowling, receive enough death
threats to paper your house. In this
context, having a pop at transgender

I


n SuperNature, his new Netflix
comedy special, Ricky Gervais
pokes fun at doctors, Hitler and
pets. But it’s not the cat gags that
have sparked online outrage. In
an opening monologue skewering
the absurdities of cancel culture,
Gervais jokes about women.
Struggling to name women
comedians, he eventually lands on
Dame Edna Everage and Eddie
Izzard.
“Women!” he complains. “Not all
women, I mean the old-fashioned
ones. The old-fashioned women, the
ones with wombs. Those f***ing
dinosaurs. I love the new women.
They’re great, aren’t they? The new
ones we’ve been seeing lately. The
ones with beards and cocks. And
now the old-fashioned ones say, ‘Oh,
they want to use our toilets.’ ‘Why
shouldn’t they use your toilets?’ ‘For
ladies!’ ‘They are ladies — look at
their pronouns! What about this
person isn’t a lady?’ ‘Well, his penis.’
‘Her penis, you f***ing bigot!’ ‘What
if he rapes me?’ ‘What if she rapes
you, you f***ing Terf ?’”
To the obvious delight of the
audience, it takes Gervais precisely
one minute to expose the lie of the
woke incantation: “Trans women are
women.” He gets to the heart of a
debate that other people — the
women whose rights are being

compromised — worry about
discussing out loud in case they end
up on the receiving end of abuse.
Yet the spontaneous shrieks of
laughter from those watching live
stand in stark contrast to the online
outrage that has ensued. Predictably,
Gervais has been condemned for
“anti-trans rants masquerading as
jokes”. Glaad, a US-based LGBTQ
campaign group, called the Netflix
special “dangerous”.
I know explaining a joke is not the
done thing, but as someone who
hooted loudly (and may have even
punched the air in jubilation) I feel
obliged to share my insights. Gervais’s
60-second tirade is funny because it
is true. Despite the total moral

certainty of transgender activists, we
all know that someone with a penis
is not a woman. His comments are
also funny because they are so
shocking. Gervais says something
considered utterly taboo in polite
society. As one of the old-fashioned
dinosaurs with a womb, it is a relief
to hear said aloud just how warped it
is to make a female victim of sexual
assault stand up in court and describe
her male attacker as a woman.
The furore around SuperNature
shows how a censorious woke
culture, where people are so quick to
perform outrage and signal their
own moral superiority, provides a
climate for a comedian like Gervais
to thrive. Ten years ago there would

Somewhere along the


line we have lost


our sense of humour


small turtles hurtled down, followed
by hail, then sun, then drizzle, etc.
There was a brief summer interlude
where my friend and I sat in the sun
but, moments later, it was torrential
rain again and we found ourselves
sheltering under a large yew in the
House Plant Studio area. Crazy.

Dispensing advice


T


he wet weather triggered yet
another announcement on the
Tube about how we have to be
careful of slippery steps. (How did we
survive before?) Victoria station
seems to be particularly addicted to
telling us stuff. The one I hate the
most is where we are asked to use
the station’s sanitising hand gel
dispensers and told: “The little things
we do help protect the little things
we love.” I mean, really? Hand gel?
Get a grip.

Attack of the vapours


W


ord of the week, spotted in
our Weather Eye column, is
“fuliginous” and means
“sooty” or “dusky” as in this
comment about London from the
pioneer environmentalist John
Evelyn in 1661: “Inhabitants breathe
nothing but an impure and thick Mist
accompanied with a fuliginous and
filthy vapour”. We need to revive it.

Ann Treneman Notebook


Platinum’s


so popular it


was stolen


from my car


@anntreneman

We can’t give in to


this blackmail by


civil service unions


Jawad Iqbal


B


ritain’s increasingly militant
public sector union bosses
are delusional if they think
there is a great wave of
public sympathy for their
bellicose threats of industrial action.
The latest self-serving union
leader to wave a stick at the public is
Mark Serwotka, general secretary of
the Public and Commercial Services
(PCS) union, representing 182,000
public sector workers, including civil
servants. He doesn’t mince his words:
“What people would see is that job
centres would close, there would be
nobody there overseeing collection
of taxes, overseeing the minimum
wage; the justice system would come
to a halt.”
Why? All because of a proposed
2 per cent pay rise for his members
and the threat of job cuts. This is an
insult, he claims, because it is civil
servants who have “kept the country
running” during the pandemic. Try
telling that to the thousands of
people whose holidays are under
threat because of delays at the
Passport Office: 500,000 applications
are waiting to be processed.
The belligerence of the union
chiefs is all too reminiscent of a
bygone era of industrial relations
based on class conflict. The cheap
rhetoric of hard-pressed workers
against fat-cat bosses is especially
ludicrous coming from union leaders
on bumper pay packages. Serwotka
takes home about £125,000 a year;
Dave Penman, general secretary of
the FDA, a union for senior civil
servants, who accused the
government of “a reckless
slash-and-burn to public services”, is
paid about £152,000 a year.
It’s the same story elsewhere in the
public sector: rail unions have just
voted to strike in a dispute over jobs,
pay and conditions. At the same time
it has emerged that rail union chiefs
took home nearly £500,000 in pay
and perks during the first year of the
pandemic: Mick Cash, the former
general secretary of the Rail,
Maritime and Transport (RMT)
union, earned £163,468 in 2020.
Union blackmail is increasingly
the order of the day in the vital
arena of public services and it’s
depressing to see civil servants using
similar threats to the rail unions.
Meanwhile it’s the public that is
suffering the most, let down by
politicians running scared of the
unions. Is anyone surprised at the
deafening silence from the Labour
Party, still heavily reliant on its union
paymasters? It still won’t say whether
it supports the strikes or not.
The government is guilty of
dithering, too. It must push ahead
with plans to impose minimum
service levels in the public sector,
preventing staff from all walking out
at once on essential services. The last
thing the country needs right now is
a crippling wave of strikes.

Jawad Iqbal is a freelance writer

Joanna
Williams

@jowilliams293
Free download pdf