302 Chapter Thirteen
entrenched conceptual metaphors and metonymies in Persian conceptual
system are shown to be relevant to the formation of the figurative
meanings used in visual and verbal modes.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Zoltan Kövecses and Eva Illes for commenting on
the earlier draft of the paper.
References
Abbassi-Shavazi, M. J. 2001. “The Fertility Revolution in Iran.”
Population and Sociétés 373: 1–3.
Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor
Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
—. 2007. The Communication of Leadership. London and New York:
Routledge.
—. 2009. “Metaphor and Political Communication.” In Metaphor and
Discourse edited by A. Musolff and J. Zinken, 97–115. Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, P. and G. Lakoff. 1995. “Metaphor in Foreign Policy Discourse.”
In Language and Peace edited by Ch. Schaffner and A. I. Wenden, 37–
- Aldershot: Ashgate.
Coupland, N. 2010. “Other Representation.” In Society and Language Use
edited by J. Jaspers, J.O. Östman, and J. Verschueren, 241–260.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deignan, A. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
—. 2010. “The Evaluative Properties of Metaphors.” In Researching and
Applying Metaphor in the Real World edited by G. Low, Z. Todd, A.
Deignan and L. Cameron, 357–373. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Fairclough, N. 1986. Language and Power. New York: Longman.
Forceville, Ch. 1996. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertisement. London and
New York: Routledge.
—. 2007. “Multimodal Metaphor in Ten Dutch TV Commercials.” The
Public Journal of Semiotics 1(1): 19–51.
—. 2009a. “Non-Verbal and Multimodal Metaphor in a Cognitivist
Framework: Agendas for Research.” In Multimodal Metaphor edited
by Ch. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi, 19–42. Mouton de Gruyter:
Berlin and New York.