The Sunday Times - UK (2022-05-29)

(Antfer) #1

24 The Sunday Times May 29, 2022


COMMENT


Robert Colvile


on those most in need, while absolutely
the right thing to do, means some will be
a lot worse off than others.
So Sunak is in the strange position of
handing out huge amounts while
warning people they will still get poorer.
There is a parallel here with NHS waiting
lists: because of the godawful Covid
backlog, the government is spending
billions more to ensure not that things
will get better by the next election, but
that they will get less worse.
Politically, this is not a place any
government wants to be. That is why,
despite the generally positive reception
for the chancellor’s measures, those in
Downing Street aren’t getting ahead of
themselves. They know it’s hard to win
on bread-and-butter issues in a world
where the butter costs a fiver.
Can the Tories pull through? One
senior figure has been reading back
through the memoirs of Thatcher,
Lawson and Howe to find how they
coped with similar periods of economic
dislocation. His conclusion was that the
government can survive if it keeps a
united front and tells the electorate a
consistent story about what is
happening and why it is doing the right
things. But in today’s Tory party, unity
and discipline can be in short supply.
@RColvile

in cash terms, and the value of that cash
falling, how many secretaries of state
will be willing to economise, and how
many will come to the Treasury
demanding a budget boost? No 11 will
argue that ministers have a choice
between spending now and tax cuts at
the election. But the prime minister is
not the only Tory whose policy on cake
is both to have it and eat it.
In other words, Sunak got his
decisions broadly right last week — with
the exception of the damaging decision
to impose a windfall tax, the only
consolation of which is that it is
enormously popular. Households really
did need extra support. And the limited
inflationary impact will probably be
offset by further interest rate hikes —
though that will add to voters’ pain.
The political problem, however, is
that the chancellor is not compensating
people enough — and never can. After
the spring statement, the Office for
Budget Responsibility estimated that he
had cushioned them from about a third
of the impact of the cost-of-living shock.
Economists I’ve spoken to guesstimate
that the many extra billions handed out
last week still take the proportion to less
than half. Even if there are more
giveaways in autumn, most of us will still
be worse off. And focusing the spending

within government. The public sector
unions will demand huge salary
increases — the railway workers are
already leading the charge. The
government will want to stand firm, to
help ensure inflation remains a
temporary problem rather than a
permanent condition. But some in the
Treasury are worried ministers may not
stand firm themselves. With budgets set

The chancellor, in his speech, insisted
that the Bank of England could get on
top of this. But the Bank’s governor is
rather less sure. Earlier this month, he
told MPs he was effectively powerless in
the face of global price surges. And he
has a point. Inflation here is moving in
lockstep with the rest of the West.
There is a silver lining. Because they
stop people spending money on other
things, energy price shocks contain the
seeds of their own destruction. Less
economic activity means less demand
for oil and gas, which means prices fall.
There are, however, two problems.
“Everyone stopping spending money” is
also called “a recession”. And even that
may not curb inflation if it has really
become baked into the system — escaped
the containment field, in my gizzard-
related analogy.
One crucial test of this will be the
scale of pay rises. It is a great Tory
achievement that unemployment is at its
lowest since 1974, though the shrinking
of the workforce post-Covid has played a
part in that. Yet that also means the
labour market is incredibly tight. If firms
start giving workers huge pay rises,
whether to cope with price increases or
just to keep them from defecting, it
could pump inflation up further.
This, indeed, will be the next big fight

O


n Thursday, Rishi Sunak spent
an enormous amount of
money. Once you add together
the £400 subtracted from
every consumer energy bill,
the extra support for
pensioners and those on
benefits, and the welfare
increases promised next year, you end
up with a larger amount than was
pledged in the entire 2019 Conservative
manifesto. In other words, the
chancellor spent more on cost of living
in a single afternoon than his party once
promised to spend over five years on
everything.
But, to look at it another way, Sunak
didn’t spend nearly enough. By autumn,
Ofgem expects the energy price cap to
stand at £2,800 — £1,500 higher than at
the beginning of the year. So for millions
of working households, that £400 is a
plaster, not a painkiller.
But the problem goes deeper than
that. The Institute for Fiscal Studies,
which specialises in UK taxation and
public policy, estimates that once you
net the tax rises against the tax cuts, the
spending announced last week and in
March is equivalent to 0.5 per cent of our
national income — a very big number.
The Resolution Foundation, another
think tank, says that all this cash will

“offset 82 per cent of [the] energy price
rise, rising to 93 per cent for poorer
households”.
This crisis, though, is no longer just
about gas bills. Early in his speech,
Sunak warned that, “even excluding
energy and food, core inflation has
become broader-based and elevated”.
This is the economic equivalent of the
moment in a movie when a lab-coated
scientist shouts: “Oh God, they’ve
breached the containment field!” —
shortly before his gizzards are devoured
by extradimensional horrors.
As we found in the 1970s, a world
where energy is expensive is a world
where everything else is too. Heating
homes. Driving cars. Building things in
factories. Making fertiliser. Growing
crops. Hence my local Tesco now trying
to charge me £5 for a tub of Lurpak.
This feeds into the wider economy.
Research in the US confirms that for
every extra dollar people have to spend
filling their car with petrol, they cut
other spending by the same amount.
Earlier this month, as reported by Tim
Shipman, polling by Portland
Communications found 58 per cent of
those surveyed had stopped themselves
spending money in the previous week
because they felt poorer. And as people
spend less, the economy suffers.

Even if there are


more giveaways


in autumn, most


of us will still


be worse off


The problem for a chancellor who likes to dig


deep: it won’t touch the sides of this crisis


A beggar
benefits
from the
generosity
of the
Scottish
reformer
George
Wishart

All wrong
Liddle objects to being asked,
“How can I help you today?”
I’d love it if that question
were posed instead of the
ubiquitous, “Are you all right
there?”
Helena Newton, Ilford

Sinking feeling
Liddle will no doubt share my
concern when hearing

Memory bunk
Can Liddle now deal with
phrases like “I’m making
memories”? I am in my
seventies and never set out to
“make memories”. Was I
lacking as a mother? My
children remember things we
did together. But making
memories? Oh come on...
Brenda Ellis
Martock, Somerset

Top up
The latest Sunday Times Rich
List (last week) highlights
again the huge increase in
wealth. Since 1980 the total
wealth of British households
has surged from three times
GDP to over seven times.
However, tax on wealth has
remained flat.
As the cost-of-living crisis
causes misery for millions,
we need to find new sources
of income to ease the pain. A
tax on some of the large gains
in wealth needs to be part of
the solution.
Mubin Haq, chief executive
abrdn Financial Fairness
Trust, Edinburgh

Loving and giving
The French economist
Thomas Piketty showed five
years ago the way to reduce
the continuously growing gap
between rich and poor is a
wealth tax. This also assists in
redistribution, essential for a
Christian society.
Church Action for Tax
Justice campaigns for such a
tax: £10 billion could be

Letters should arrive by
midday on Thursday and
include the full address and a
phone number. We may edit
letters, which must be
exclusive to The Sunday Times

CORRECTIONS &


CLARIFICATIONS


Complaints concerning
inaccuracies in all sections of
The Sunday Times should be
addressed to complaints@
sunday-times.co.uk or
Complaints, The Sunday
Times, 1 London Bridge Street,
London SE1 9GF. In addition,
the Independent Press
Standards Organisation
(Ipso) will examine formal
complaints about editorial
content in UK newspapers
and magazines. Please go to
our website for full details of
how to lodge a complaint.

LETTERS


TO THE EDITOR


The Sunday Times,
1 London Bridge Street,
London SE1 9GF
Email: letters@
sunday-times.co.uk

1453 Constantinople
captured by Ottoman army
and renamed Istanbul
1942 Bing Crosby records
world’s biggest hit: 50m-
selling White Christmas
1953 Edmund Hillary and
Tenzing Norgay reach
summit of Mount Everest
1985 At Heysel stadium,
Brussels, 39 fans die in
Liverpool v Juventus match

Rupert Everett is 63 today

ANNIVERSARIES


BIRTHDAYS POINTS


Annette Bening, actress, 64
Mel Brown, Spice Girl, 47
Danny Elfman, composer, 69
Rupert Everett, actor, 63
Noel Gallagher, rock star, 55
Prof Peter Higgs, particle
physicist, 93
Nanette Newman, actress, 88
Martin Pipe, racehorse
trainer, 77

He gets my vote
Thank you for cheering up
my Sunday morning. The
photo of a broad-shouldered
man casting his vote in
swimming trunks, with his
little girl wrapped up against
the coming winter, captures
the essence of Sydney’s
eastern beach suburbs
brilliantly. It may well be
posed, but it’s none the worse
for that.
Penny Metcalfe
Nailsworth, Gloucestershire

Nudes worthy
Camilla Long queries the
value of “getting one’s boobs
out” as a form of protest on
the red carpet (Comment,
last week). The point is not to
blame those at the event for
Russian war crimes, but
rather to ensure the attention
of the world is on the issue.
The protester appears to have
achieved this.
Sarah Asan, London N10

Follow my leader
Philip Sherwell says of North
Korea’s Covid surge that Kim
Jong-un “is deploying the
classic despot playbook of
finding fall guys for the
failings of the state”. Tim
Shipman writes of the No 10
parties: “For months Johnson
has told anyone who will
listen that ... he was badly let
down.” No similarities there.
Ian Harvey, Norwich

Failing with age
As a 77-year-old graduate I
can pass all the standard tests
for dementia, yet I can’t
remember much about
recent holidays and family
occasions (“Better-educated
people ‘can hide dementia
longer’”, News, last week). A
CT scan showed small vessel
disease and slight shrinkage
of the brain. As these are part
of ageing, professionals are
dismissive. But it is evident to
those closest to me that
something is very amiss.
Barbara Burford
Hemel Hempstead

Slotting in a goal
I share neither the religious
nor the sexual leanings of
Richard Coles, but I was
delighted to see him
contributing to Week Ending
(Comment, last week).
He is so evidently kind and
generous of spirit, and his
piece about the footballer
Jake Daniels was the best I’ve
read in that slot.
Richard Minter
Calne, Wiltshire

Gâteau guzzler
I disagree with David Austins
(Letters, last week) about
cake being for sharing. Cake
is for having it and eating it,
as Boris Johnson has so ably
demonstrated.
Ali Kelman, Fetcham, Surrey

Loose threads
The conclusion of the
Metropolitan Police opaque
inquiry into No 10 parties
leaves several serious
questions unanswered. For
example, why were more
recipients of fines female,
why were recipients
primarily in junior positions
and, in particular, is the Met
considering entering a
candidate into next year’s
Great British Sewing Bee?
Adrian Hetherington
Worksop

More letters are published
online: sundaytimes.co.uk

raised by a tax of 1.1 per cent
on wealth above £10 million.
The Patriotic Millionaires
would settle for £5 million:
that’s true patriotism.
The Rev David Haslam
Evesham

Easing does it
Your editorial (Comment, last
week) is guilty of the “lazy
cry” that no new money can
be created. Overcoming the
banking and Covid crisis was
predominantly paid for by
the Bank of England’s
quantitative easing (QE)
programme: between 2009
and 2021, £895 billion of new
money was created, with no
resulting inflation.
It’s time for QE3.
Colin Hines, Twickenham

Flat rate
Given Sunak’s 222nd position
in your Rich List, it is obvious
he should be our next prime
minister. For a start, he would
have no difficulty in paying
for the redecoration of the
Downing Street flat.
Peter Cash, Stoke-on-Trent

GETTY IMAGES
The government seems to be
paralysed by disagreement
over how to deal with the
cost-of-living crisis (News, last
week). It’s seldom I find
myself agreeing with Iain
Duncan Smith, but there is a
system explicitly designed to
help the poorest: benefits.
Any other solution to the
crisis (reducing VAT, two-year
MoTs and so on) will spend
more taxpayers’ money for
less benefit to those who
need it. Some solutions
(lower income tax thresholds;
cuts in fuel tax) actually help
the rich more. The only
possible reason anyone is
talking about them is that
many Tory MPs would rather
do anything than raise
benefits. It’s an attitude that’s
been in play since the time of
Elizabeth I: if the poor are not
starved, they won’t work.
Jeremy Cushing
Taddyforde, Exeter

Northern exposure
With regard to rising energy
costs, I would point out that
temperatures are usually

lower in northern than
southern Britain. This means
that, especially in late winter
and spring, the heating has to
be switched on more in the
north than the south. Could
there be some regional
allowance to reflect this?
Andrew Whiteley
Consett, Co Durham

Expat duty
Many private pension
schemes rely on business

success to build the savings of
their members. A windfall tax
on energy firms would hurt
those who don’t benefit from
a public sector scheme.
I suggest the chancellor
follows America’s lead and
taxes all UK passport-holders
on global earnings, wherever
they live. The Treasury would
get a welcome boost from
five million extra taxpayers.
David Crowther
Melton Mowbray

Raise benefits or admit you want the poor to suffer


conduct themselves is insane.
They wouldn’t allow them do
it did for anything else.
Schools are there to educate
children. Indulging their
immature and ill-informed
beliefs about gender identity
is doing the exact opposite.
Liz Langrick, Mansfield

Victorian views
All the child wanted was to be
respected. To force a child
into not just a name but a
whole identity they are not
comfortable with is cruel.
This teacher has old-
fashioned views in a modern
world and should go the way
of the loom.
Richard Curtis, Ascot

American airline captains
announce that “we will be in
the air momentarily”.
Neil Mendoza,
Bushey, Hertfordshire

Working definition
I’d like to add “work
colleagues” to Liddle’s
collection. What other sort is
there?
Andrew Critcher, Macclesfield

Pupil’s side of the story
I am in year 8 at a London
comprehensive. The
countless times I have
witnessed bullying of my
LGBTQ+ peers shows another
side to the story.
In many schools most
children would support
teachers if they refused to use
a pupil’s preferred pronouns
and name. It is very bold of
the pupil in the article to tell
the whole school how they
identify.
Name and address withheld on
request

Bad education
Letting children dictate to
teachers how they should

social care problems
alongside their traditional
callouts to life-threatening
illness and injury. NHS
Providers recently estimated
that England’s ambulance
trusts are underfunded by
£240 million a year.
The public generally has
great faith in the ambulance
service, but the government
does not appear committed
to tackling the challenges it
faces. That has to change.
Professor Leo McCann
University of York

Give waste the boot
Following Jim Crean’s
comments on NHS waste
(Letters, last week), I
ruptured my Achilles tendon
last year. After two week in
plaster I was fitted with a
Vacoped boot, a wonderful
piece of German engineering.
When I asked where to
return the boot ten weeks
later, I was told to “bin it”.
They cost £240 online. The
cynic in me suspects the NHS
is paying twice that to some
dodgy middleman.
Robert Shotton
Nantwich, Cheshire

NHS relapsing


into cover-ups


Your story “NHS covered up
ambulance deaths scandal”
(News, last week) showed
how far we have to go to have
an open and fair culture
across the NHS. In 2014 the
government brought in a legal
“duty of candour” — a legal
requirement for NHS bodies
to be open and honest when
things go wrong and cause
harm to patients.
It was a watershed
moment for the NHS. No
longer would cover-ups be
tolerated — or so we hoped.
Things are improving, but
to complete the job we need
to see robust action taken
when organisations do
breach the duty of candour.
Peter Walsh, chief executive
Action against Medical
Accidents

Trouble at the top
This latest ambulance deaths
cover-up scandal is yet
further evidence that the NHS
is broken. But who is
ultimately responsible for

driving a culture of secrecy
and silencing whistleblowers?
A 30-minute delay in
getting to my father’s
witnessed cardiac arrest last
July revealed that NHS
England and Sajid Javid, the
health secretary, had known
for weeks that trusts across
the country were not
providing timely emergency
care for heart attacks and
strokes, resulting in countless
unnecessary deaths.
Simultaneously, years of
political failure to tackle
head-on two of the biggest
drivers of the population’s
dire health, Big Food and Bad
Pharma, has resulted in a
healthcare system that can no
longer cope with the strain.
Dr Aseem Malhotra
Consultant cardiologist and
president of the Public Health
Collaboration

State of emergency
The pressures on the UK
ambulance service are
unsustainable. About 30,000
calls a day are made to 999,
and ambulance crews are
increasingly dealing with
primary care, psychiatric and

Teachers despair


over trans wars


The story of the teacher who
felt forced to leave their
school because of gender
identity policies (News, last
week) is not uncommon.
Many cannot bear being
compelled to lie to children.
When a girl is “affirmed”
as a boy and socially
transitioned, often behind
parents’ backs, ideology is
overriding reality in a way
that may harm the child.
Teachers are not qualified to
make such decisions.
Stephanie Davies-Arai,
director, Transgender Trend

The howlers that


make us scream


One omission from Rod
Liddle’s list of grammatical
horrors (Comment, last
week) is using “basis” instead
of an adverb. As in “I exercise
on a daily basis” (daily).
Peter Cartledge
Tetchill, Shropshire

JOIN THE CONVERSATION ONLINE


Your comments from
thesundaytimes.co.uk

We’d like to report that it was
Nicola Benedetti’s views on
boycotting Russian musicians
that had Culture readers
sparring. But no. They were
arguing about dinosaur sex.
“‘We learn that T. rex only
made noise when it was
mating,’” a sceptical Geoff
Corner wrote, quoting our
review of David
Attenborough’s new

television show — “how does
a study of a fossil tell us this?”
bluearmyfaction had an
inkling: “The programme will
probably say.” Steve
Shepherd already knew:
“Researchers looked at over
200 species of modern birds
and when their ancestors
evolved the ability to make
closed-mouth vocalisations
...” Actually, Steve, do you

mind if we watch the
programme after all?
Cheese and onion
chocolate divided readers too
— in some cases because it
was too tame. Noel Hegarty
demanded “a salt-and-
vinegar-with-dark-chocolate
version”. He’d opened the
weird-food floodgates, and
Bob Blunt revealed: “In
Wigan they’ve been known to

sell pie and blue cheese
panini.” Dane Batt reflected:
“I’ve been eating toast spread
with Marmite and peanut
butter for years — and now
you can buy jars of it ready
mixed.” Janice Lindsay liked
“chocolate digestives with a
piece of strong cheddar
cheese”. For brammbles
heaven was “a mouthful of
proper salt-and-vinegared

chip-shop chips with
Cadbury milk chocolate”. Dr
Nick Cornish had stumbled
on the taste sensation of
“Worcester sauce crisps with
a Twix”.
If anyone’s hungry after
that, Jane Graham’s cost-
cutting advice won’t help.
“The biggest saving is to stay
slim,” she averred. “You will
spend less on food and drink.

You can wear your clothes for
decades. You will stay well
and keep earning.” “Now you
tell me!” wailed bobulator.
But A Moniker reasoned: “If
you’re less well insulated
you’ll need to turn the
heating up.” What we need is
a hot drink so vile you won’t
ever put on weight. Vindaloo
and liquorice Bovril, maybe?
Rob Nash

Last week we asked: Should the government impose a
windfall tax on oil and gas companies?

From a poll of 14,775 Times and Sunday Times readers

This week’s question:
Should Ukraine cede territory to Russia for peace?
Have your say at sundaytimes.co.uk/poll

NO


71% 29%


YES


READERS’ POLL

Free download pdf