FEEDBACK
Email at: [email protected]http://www.airforcesmonthly.com #354 SEPTEMBER 2017 // 75Ukrainian Albatros additions
Above: L-39C ‘72 Blue’ (c/n 934658) of 7 brTA, Ukraine’s sole Su-24 unit, during a training flight over its home base
of Starokostyantyniv in August 2012. Together with ‘71 Blue’, this aircraft was delivered to the unit fresh from
overhaul in Odessa on June 26 that year. These were the first L-39s to sport the (now standard) grey ‘digital’
camouflage. This year, 7 brTA received two new L-39M1s (also identical ‘71 Blue’ and ‘72 Blue’) from Odessa as
replacements. The older aircraft were likely transferred to another unit, probably to 203 navbr at Chuhuyiv, which
also received 7 brTA’s L-39C ‘73 Blue’. Nick Cross
The feature on Ukrainian L-39s
in the July issue includes some
erroneous information. It
mentions that Ukraine entered
co-operation with IAI Lahav.
However, collaboration with
Israeli industry was actually
a joint venture involving the
overhaul plant at Odessa and
was not endorsed by (nor aimed
at) the Ukrainian Air Force.
The Ukrainian modernisation
programme is alive and well –
the Odessa facility still turns out
both L-39M1s and L-39Ms (note
there are no M2 or M3 variantsas mentioned in the text). By
my count, 14 upgraded jets have
been delivered to date (not eight- as reported in the text – and
two of these are L-39Ms). The
latest L-39M1 was delivered
this spring. The 14 aircraft
include the three (not four)
impounded by Russia in Crimea
in 2014, which remain there.
I have, as yet, unconfirmed
information suggesting frontline
units will start (or are perhaps
already in the process of)
transferring their operational
L-39Cs to the training brigade
at Chuhuyiv, indicating that
these will soon be replaced
by new L-39M/M1 aircraft.
The photo in the article
actually shows one of the
modernised L-39M1s (‘80 Blue’
of 299 brTA), not an L-39C.
The L-39M1 and especially the
more advanced L-39M have
a few distinguishing features
compared with the standard
L-39C. Ukraine’s MiG-29 experts,
in the April 2017 issue, provides
all the basic information on
Ukraine’s modernised L-39s.
Vladimir TrendafilovskiChilean
Dauphin
upgrade – not
a done deal
I would like to add some
detail to the news piece in
the June issue (p21) about
the modernisation of the
Chilean Navy’s SA365 Dauphin
II fleet. The report seems
to be based on declarations
made by Helibras (Airbus
Helicopters’ Brazilian
subsidiary) during the last
LAAD show. Contrary to what
is stated, the Chilean Navy
has not yet signed a contract
to modernise its SA365s.
The Chilean Navy has plans
to upgrade its Dauphin II fleet,
but it is unlikely that such a
contract will be signed this year.
The upgrade will be
conducted in phases and
batches. This is not because
of budgetary constraints,
but because there are two
different groups of machines
in the fleet (the Argentine
Coast Guard will follow
the same programme).
The priority for upgrade will
be the four former Irish Air
Corps SA365F1s acquired in
2008, which are heavier and
underpowered (the reason
for their retirement from
Irish service). The addition
of a new, more powerful
engine is badly needed. This
said, these machines have
served the Chilean Navy
well, and have been carefully
operated within their limits.
The other four SA365Ns
in Chilean Navy service
are lighter and have more
powerful engines, so their
upgrade is less urgent.
José HigueraItalian
firefighters
explained
In the May issue (Feedback,
p94) Carlo Cervi writes that
Italian CL-415s from Italy’s
Corpo Forestale dello Stato
operated in Israel late last year.
It should be pointed out that
the Corpo Forestale dello Stato
only operated the CL-215, and
this in the period 1982-84. The
Canadairs were then passed
on to the Italian Air Force, and
later to the Protezione Civile
(Civil Protection). The CL-415s
were acquired by the Italian
Protezione Civile starting in- The CL-415s were in turn
passed from the Protezione
Civile to the Vigili del Fuoco
(Firefighting Corps) in 2013.
Riccardo Niccoli
Ian Carroll of AirForces Intelligence
provides two corrections to
news items that appeared
in the July issue. On p11, the
Royal Netherlands Air Force
CH-47F contract is not for
15 helicopters, but for an
unspecified number from USArmy Production Lot 15. On p12,
the Spanish Tigre is not 10065,
but 10068. The number is visible
in the front cockpit window.
In the August issue, the correct
location for Al Udeid is, of course
Qatar, and not the United Arab
Emirates (BALTOPS bombers, p87).Above: Two earlier examples of the Spanish Army Aviation Tigre. HA.28-01 ET-701 was delivered to the Fuerzas
Aeromóviles (FAMET, Army Air Mobile Forces) as a Tigre HAP in December 2005. Another HAP model, HA.28-05 ET-705
was handed over to FAMET in September 2008. Operating unit is Batallón de Helicópteros de Ataque I (BHELA I, Attack
Helicopter Battalion 1) at Ciudad Real-Almagro. Salvador Mafé HuertasCORRECTIONS