being developed by Boeing in Seattle.
For our simulator training, I think we
got a couple of hours total, we ew the
‘Iron Bird’ simulator that was designed
to test hardware like hydraulic actuators
and generators in Fort Worth. Our initial
check rides were administered by test
pilots. We did the tactical upgrades by
supervising each other. I remember ying
in the backseat of an F-15D in a BFM [basic
ghter manoeuvres] ght to write a grade
sheet on the now Brig Gen Charles ‘Corky’
Corcoran one morning, and swapping
cockpits in the afternoon so he could write
the same grade sheet on me when it was
my turn to y the F-22. Unorthodox for
sure, but there was no alternative since we
were the rst pilots to ever y the F-22 in a
dynamic tactical environment — nobody
had own the jet beyond controlled
developmental test pro les!’
Niemi and his fellow pilots were
operating under Detachment 6, Air
Force Flight Test Center. They were not
developing tactics — that was left for the
operational test team at the 422nd Test
and Evaluation Squadron (TES) at Nellis.
Detachment 6 was at Edwards and ying
both the EMD jets and some initial PRTV
aircraft purely to take an early look at how
the Raptor performed in an operational
environment and enable a decision on
high-rate production.
‘We had an initial tactics manual, but it
wasn’t really that useful,’ says Col Niemi.
‘It had been written by o cers on the
sta who had never own the F-22. We
largely developed the tactics through trial
and error with access to the best threat
replication tools available on the Nevada
Test and Training Range (NTTR). We’d get
together in the o cers’ club bar at Edwards
on a Friday night and debate what had
worked, what might work, and then try out
new ideas the following week in the open
air environment. We had a fair amount of
‘PARTICIPATING
IN THE F22
DIOT&E
PROGRAMME WAS
PROBABLY THE
HIGHLIGHT OF MY
ENTIRE 24YEAR
CAREER’
COL CHRIS NIEMI
freedom to experiment; I think the USAF
senior leaders of the time understood that
there was much we didn’t know about
optimising the F-22 in combat scenarios.
Some of our ideas turned out to be bunk,
but others formed the basis for the tactics
we still use today throughout the F-22
community. I’m proud to see those stand
the test of time.’
INTO SERVICE
While it is understood that while DIOT&E
was largely successful and clearly hugely
in uential on the way the Raptor was
to be employed, it threw up a number
of areas of concern. This led to a further
round of operational testing, this time the
Follow-On Test and Evaluation (FOT&E) at
Nellis AFB in late 2005. It was a mandated
Above left to
right: Col Chris
Niemi was one
of the pilots
who initially
assessed the
operational
suitability of the
F-22.
Jamie Hunter
A 422nd TES
F-22A pilot at
Nellis AFB in
2005.
Jamie Hunter
DIOT&E gave
pilots access to
the full range
of threats
o ered by the
Nevada Test and
Training Range
(NTTR).
Jamie Hunter
A 422nd TES
F-22 soars
skyward.
Jamie Hunter
A 422nd TES
F-22A tucks
its gear as
the F119
engines
power it out
of Nellis.
Jamie
Hunter
(^32) RAPTOR
28-37 Niemi and Service C.indd 32 28/09/2017 14:51