W
HETHER REFERRED
TO as a MiG-29M
or a MiG-35, the
latest ‘Fulcrum’ is
one and the same
aircraft — the
di ering identities depend mainly
upon marketing-speak. The variant
ordered by Syria (now on hold) and then
Egypt is designated as the MiG-29M,
or M2 in its two-seat version, while
that for Russia is the MiG-35S/35UB,
but the di erences between them are
insigni cant. The internal designation
at the Mikoyan design bureau is izdeliye
9.41S for the single-seater and 9.47S for
the two-seater in the original form for
Syria. Further derivatives for Egypt are
designated 9.41SM and 9.47SM, and for
Russia 9.41SR and 9.47SR respectively.
The airframe is based on the
MiG-29K carrier ghter, but with some
simpli cations. It lacks the arresting
hook and folding wing mechanism, and
the speci c navigation equipment for
carrier operations has been removed.
Compared with a ‘classic’ MiG-29, the
new ghter has eight per cent more
thrust and 45 per cent more fuel, which
address the ghter’s primary Achilles’
heel — range.
The Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS)
remain lukewarm towards the MiG-35.
Despite numerous declarations,
the Russian Ministry of Defense has
continued to procrastinate over an order
Based on the MiG-29K airframe, Russia has developed a new shore-based derivative. Known as
both the MiG-29M and MiG-35, the advanced ‘Fulcrum-F’ is now in production.
REPORT Piotr Butowski
‘FULCRUM’
ENCORE
Right: This
MiG-29M is one
of two aircraft
produced
in Syrian
confi guration. It
carries a Grom-E2
glide weapon.
All photos
Piotr Butowski
Below: MiG-35UB
‘712’ is among two
pre-production
aircraft built
to ‘Russian
standard’. Here it
carries a I-220/
KE air-to-ground
targeting pod.
http://www.combataircraft.net // March 2018 77
77-79 Russian Fighters MiG-35 C.indd 77 19/01/2018 11:06