Enoch and the Mosaic Torah- The Evidence of Jubilees

(Nora) #1

Lutz Doering


pie. One may ask, of course, why Second Passover, for those unable to purify
in a timely way, is not mentioned in Jubilees,^20 but I would urge some cau­
tion here: the absence of certain issues may primarily be motivated by liter­
ary concerns; Jubilees does not cover every legal detail. Surely, we should not
infer that Jubilees dispenses with "ritual" purity for Passover — the double
reference in Jub 49:9 suggests otherwise.



  1. Second tithe becomes impure after one year. According to Jub 32:10-14,
    second tithe is to be eaten in the temple within one year of its specific "sea­
    sons" (i.e., firstfruits) for "seed," wine, and oil. V. 13 states that anything left
    beyond its respective season ("grows old") is to be viewed as "contaminated"
    (se'uba); "it is to be burned up because it has become impure" (rekusa). This
    is a different type of purity rule than the ones discussed so far, but it is "rit­
    ual" in nature. We know about distinct firstfruit festivals for wheat, wine,
    and oil from 4Q251 frg. 9 (olim 5) and from nQTa 43:4-10.^21 The continua­
    tion in nQTa 43 :11-12 also provides a parallel to Jubilees' rule on second tithe,
    although its unfitness is expressed by a form of ttfTp, here: "to be for­
    feited."^22 In contrast to rabbinic halakah,^23 Jubilees and nQTa insist on con­
    sumption of the second tithe "year by year," as specified in Deut 14:22. The
    "impurity" (or "forfeiture") of any leftover tithe apparently results from its
    missing its proper time, as well as from the mixture between old and new it
    implies.

  2. The problem of corpse impurity and the role of the sanctuary for "rit­
    ual" purity in Jubilees. Somewhat perplexing is the lack of concern for corpse
    impurity in the story of Abraham's death and burial in Jub 23:1-7: Jacob is ly­
    ing in his grandfather's bosom, unaware that he has just passed away, then
    realizing he is dead (w. 2-3); even Isaac, rushing to the scene, "fell on his fa­
    ther's face, cried, and kissed him" (v. 4). However, we need to recall that Jubi­
    lees closely follows the perspective of the angelic discourse (i.e., at Mount Si-

  3. See the paper by Stephane Saulnier, "Jub 49:1-14 and the Second Passover: How
    (and Why) to Do Away with an Unwanted Festival," Hen 31, no. 1 (2009).

  4. Cf. J. M. Baumgarten, "4Q Halakah", the Law of Hadash, and the Pentecontad Cal­
    endar," JJS 27 (1976): 36-46. However, whereas these texts clearly assume a pentecontad festi­
    val sequence (cf. nQTa 18-23; 4Q^25 J 9 4-6), there is no such indication in Jubilees. For Jubi­
    lees' peculiar calendrical agenda, see further the chapter in this volume by Jonathan Ben-
    Dov, "Tradition and Innovation in the Calendar of Jubilees."

  5. J. Maier, Die Tempelrolle vom Toten Meer und das "Neue Jerusalem," 3rd ed. (Mu­
    nich: E. Reinhardt, 1997), 176: "als Heiliges verfallen, tabuisiert, daher auch fur anderweitige
    Verwendung unrein," referring to Deut 22:9.

  6. Allowing storage up to three years (m. Maaser Sheni 5:6) and prescribing "poor
    tithe" every third year instead (m. Avot 5:9).

Free download pdf