2018-10-01_Reader_s_Digest_AUNZ

(John Hannent) #1
TECH

22 | October• 2018

argumentsweremoredismissiveof
the contrary opinions.
Experts chalk this up to perceived
anonymity of the web. “People are
a lot bolder on Facebook than they
are in real life,” says etiquette expert
Wendy Mencel. “here is a disconnect
between what they write and how it
comes across – they forget their words
canofend people.”
Inlightoftheseindings,the
researchers advise people to work out
their diferences by talking in person
instead of iring up the keyboard.
Whileit’seasyfortemperstolare
over social media, meeting face-to-
facecansmoothoutdisagreements
andevencreatecompromise.
Sothenexttimeyouringers
areitchingtojoinaparticularly
passionate social media debate,
consider scheduling a lunch date
or phone call instead.

LET’SBEHONEST,most of us are
guilty of committing a social media
fauxpasortwo.Butnetiquette
expertsadvisetostayawayfrom
thekeyboardwhenitcomesto
hot-button topics. It’s not just a
sign you’re sharing way too much
on Facebook; research has found
youmightresponddiferentlytoan
opinion you read online.
To prove the point, researchers at
University of California, Berkeley
andUniversityofChicagorecruited
300volunteerstoread,watch
or listen to arguments about
controversialtopics.henthey
answered questions about the
opinions they disagreed with.
he people who heard or watched
someonetalkaboutopposingviews
were less likely to characterise the
speakeras‘uninformedorheartless’.
However, those who read the

Avoid Online Arguments


BY BROOKE NELSON

Socialmediaisnot
thebestplacefor
disagreements

PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES
Free download pdf