8 MichelleBarker
andCristinaRochabeenhistorically
limited
(Bucknell
1992).twochapters
inthisbook(Bubna-LitioandHiggins.andCousens)
attesttothecontinuing
desireforsuch
eeumenismanddemonstrate
thebenefitsofthisBoumaarguesthat‘migtation
hasbeenthemajor
factorin
theradicalincreasing
religious diversity
inAustralia'(2003:
59).
Indeed,in 2006 69percentofBuddhists
(288,100)were
bornoverseas(ABS2007),
Of
these,
nearly250,werefromAsiancountries.It
isnoteworthy.however,
that
5,werebornintheUnitedKingdom.
TableI
liststhetop15 Asian
countriesinwhichAustralianBuddhistswereborn.However,Bouma
also observesthat ‘the
recentincreaseamongBuddhistscannot beentirely
explained bymigration’(2003: 59).Therehas beenarisein
thenumberofconverts.
Thisissimilartowhat
hasbeenoccurring
inotherWesternsettings,probably
duetothecredibilityBuddhismcarri'
intheWestandto
thefactthatinrecent
decadesAustralianshave
become‘sptntual‘ratherthan‘religious'(Bouma2006:62).Thishasbeenaccompanied
byanexpansion
ofthereligiousmarketthroughmigration,
travelandincreasedglobalization.InAustralia,theexpansion
oftheNewAge
movementhas
translatedintoariseof
alternativespiritualities(Bouma2006:61—3).Although
censusfigures
tendtolackthe
refinementofin-depth
research.they
canprovide
ageneral
ideaofthefield.Forinstance,
thenumber
ofAustraliansidentifying
with
naturereligions
hasincreasedIn
I996theseconstitutedI0,000(0.
percentofthepopulation);
in200Ithis
numberroseto23.(0.
percentofthepopulation)and,by
2006.hadreached29,396 (0.
percent).Boumaarguesthat ‘therise
ofPagan
andTableI
2Birthplace
ofAustralian
Buddhists. 2006('Dlmlrynfhir/lx Number
ofadhmmVietnam93.China(excludesSARSandTaiwanProvince) 36,Malaysia
23,Thailand23,ICambodia19,
Sri
LankaI93."Taiwan9.Japan
8.Hong
Kong(SARof
China)
7,Laos7.2IIndonesia5.Singapore
4.Burma(Myanmar)
4,Korea.
RepublicoftSouth) 3.EastTimor2.E
Source:
ABS2006,
CountryofBirth
ofPersonand
ReligiousAffiliationby
AustraliaIntroduction 9NewAgespiritualities
islargely
attributabletochanges
inreligiousidentity
inresponsetotheglobalization
ofideasaboutreligion'(2003:
55).Twootherdevel-opmentshavecontributedtothisspiritual
renewal.
First.therehasbeenadeclineinmainlineProtestantgroups(forinstance.
Anglicansarenow18.percentofthepopulation,
whiletheycomprised
40percentin
1947).Second,thereisanincreaseinthenumberofAustralianswhoidentifyas‘noreligion'inthecensuSrfrom15.percentin200]to18.percentin2006.Giventhesethreedevelopments
7
an increaseinspiritualities
of
choice.adeclineininstitutionalizedreligionandanincreaseof‘noreligion”,
itishighlylikelythatincreasing
numbersofAustraliansaremigratingfrominstitutionalizedreligions
toamorefluidspirituality.Indeed,Boumahascalledattentiontothefactthatthenumberofpeople
whosereligionwas‘inadequately
described'hasincreased 552percentbetweenthe 1996 and 2001 censuses(nearly
2percentofthepopulation).
WhenBoumoaccessedpeople’s
writtenresponsestotheirreligion
inthe‘other‘box.hefoundthatthe‘wordspiritualwasthemostfrequent
choice‘(2003:
65)
AccordingtoBouma:‘thegrowthofmeditationandspiritualitycentresprovides
furtherevidenceofthechange
andregeneration
ofAustralianreligious
andspiritual
Iifc~
(2006:162).ThisissupportedbyTaccy.
whofoundin 2003 thatreligious
andspiritualrevitalizationwasoccurringinAustralia(2003)However,whileAustraliansareexperimentingwith arangeofspiritualities,convertsto Buddhism are notnecessarily ‘picking
andmixing~
from diversereligious
traditions in NewAge
fashion. Oneofthefew studies ofconvertBuddhistsinAustraliaconcludedthattheirapproach
topractice
wasnotNewAge;ratherthatconvertBuddhistsin thisstudy
‘Iocatedthemselveswithinadiscretespiritual
traditioninarelativelystablemanner Atthecoreofthepractice
isdisciplined
andregular
meditation.comhincdwithdetailedstudy
ofBuddhistphilosophy
asitisdocumentedinadvanced textsandscnptures'(Phillips
andAarons2005:
219720).
Fitzpatrick‘sanalysisofTibetanBuddhistpractices
in thisvolumesuggeststhatthemeaning
oftraditionalreligiouspractices
arereframedandreapplied
tosuit thecontemporaryneeds ofAustralian individuals Thisapproach
issimilartothepractices
ofotherWesternBuddhists. whoblurtheboundariesbetweenIaici7ationandmona:'cism.Buddhistpractice
ischangingsubtly
inotherways,The Australian website.BuddhaNet,
exemplifiestheincreasing
effects oftheintemet. BuddhaNetis anon-sectarian Buddhistinformationandeducation
network,administeredby
theBuddha DhatmaEducationAssociationthatprovides
onlineresourcesfrom allBuddhisttraditions.VenerablePannyavaro,
thewebmasterof
BuddhaNet.FounderandPresidentoftheBuddhaDharmaEducationAssciationandaVice-PresidentoftheWorldFellowship
ofBuddhists.seespossibilities
forchanging
thewayBuddhismistaughtthrough
useofonlineresources.VenerablePannyavam
(2004)
suggests:Thetempleapproach
inteaching
theDharmaisthrough
sermonswiththeteacherandthecontentbeingunchallenged.
Thenewwayisthroughgroup
learning
viadiscussion.OntheNetit'sthrough
chatgroupswheretheteacherormoderatoractsasafacilitatorforanongoing
debateordiscussion.