14 MichelleBarker
andCris/hmRochaAccordingtothemyth
the‘typicalAustralian‘isapractical
man,
roughandready
inhismanners
andquicktodecryany
appearanceofafl‘cctation inothers.He'sagreat
improviser,everwilling‘tohaveago'atanything
HebelievesthatJack
isnotonlyasgood
ashismasterbut,
atleastinprinciple.
probably
agood
deal
better,and so heis agreat‘ltnucker‘ofeminentpeople
He‘safiercely independentperson
who hatesot‘frciousnessanauthority,
especiallywhenthesequalities
are
embodiedinmilitary
officersandpolicemen.
(WardI992:
l79~80lFor
Ward,thisnationalcharacter
wasconstructedwithcharacteristics
derivedfromthebushmen(‘outbackemployees,
semi-nomadic
drovers,shepherds.
shearers.
bullock~drivers.
stockmen.boundary—riders.
andstation»hands‘)
ofthenineteenthcentury(1992: 180).Mostofthese
werein factconvictsorerr-convicts andweremen
whowerefiercelyindependent
andpractical
duetotheirnomadiclife.Althoughthisis
notalifestyleoraprofession
that
ispervasive
incontemporaryAustralia.thisnationalmyth
nonethelesscontinues
to atTecthow thenationperceives
itselfHalafofl‘schapter
observesthatthe
mediaemploy
thesesalnequalities(e.g.
‘maiter—of-factAussie
attitude'.
‘easy
goingstyle‘)todescribetheFPMTAustralia
nun.VenerableRobinaCurtin.Finally.theinlcrminglingof Australianindigenous
spiritualityandZenBuddhismisnoteworthy.
TheprofileofAngln-AustralianBuddhisttertiary
educated. urban.leaning
towards the left and well otl',
fat:ttutes thisphenomenon (Philips
and
Aarons 2005:22l). Anglo-AustralianBuddhistsfrom thissociodernographic possess knowledge
of,andrespectfor.
indig-enousculturesthatmakethem
keentobridge
thegapand
findcommonalitiesbetweenbothcultures.Inapreviousarticle,McAraexamined
the
relationshipbetweenaFPMTTibetan
BuddhistgroupinruralAustraliaandtheAboriginalowners ofthe
land.
exploringhow the FPMTsought
toacknowledge
andaccommodatetheoriginalowners,
to
achieveanoutcomewhere‘Abnriginalconceptsof land-basedspiritualiand
Tibetan Buddhiststrategies
forestablishing
theDharmain newplaces
momentarilycame intoan unusualrelationship‘(McAra2007).Inherchapter.Bamaghi
concludesthatindigenous
spiritualityandZenBuddhismsharethewisdomof
interconnectednessand thatmuchcanhe
learnedl'romthespiritualrelationship
ofindigenous
Australianstotheirlandandsenseol’place.
Elsewhere.Buddhismhas beenconnectedto
theecological
movement
(Harris[995),but
Ihereisverylittlewrittenaboutthe
connectionsWesternBuddhistsmake
betweenBuddhismandindigenousspirituality
orhowindigenouspeople
inWestern
countrieshavereactedtothearrivalof
Buddhismontheirland
(McAra2007),Theintermingling
ot‘Australianindigenous
spiritualityandBuddhismmaybegin
anewflow
ofideasandpractices
that.whileoriginating
inAustralia.willcirculatetheglobe.
*
Inlmduclt’arr l 5
ConclusionBuddhismin
AustraliasharesmanycharacteristicsincommonwithBuddhisminotherWestern
countries.
However.localizationsandadaptations
alsoreflectdiffer-encesdueto
historical.geographic
andpoliticalfactors.Buddhism inAustraliacanbeseentohavebeen
influencedby
thespecifics
oftheAustralian
situation,itsproximity
toAsia.itsmulticulturalistpolicies
anditsrelationships
withBuddhisminEurope
and America. Theresult is
theexistence ofmanyBuddhismsinAustralia;traditionsthatareinastateofchange.
Agoodexample
ofthefactthatBuddhismin
Australiaisnotonly
derivativeofBuddhisminotherWesterncountries(althoughheavily
influencedby
it)aretheeventsthat tookplace
attheBodhinyana
MonasteryinPerthinlate2009.TheBodhinyanaMonastery
endeavouredtorevivethe
bhikkhunilineagebyfrilly
ordaining
four bhiltkhuniswithoutauthorization from
eithertheeldersofthetraditionorThaiBuddhistauthorities.Theverypublicand
acrimoniousdispute
thatfollowedresultedintheexpulsion
oftheBodhinyana
MonasteryfromtheWatPahPonglineage
andtheexcommunicationofthedharmateacher,
Phra
Brahmavamso.popularly
knownasAjahn
Brahm,forsponsoring
the
ordination.The incidentinAustraliahadrepercussions
forother'l'haitemples
in
theWest.AccordingtoTheBangkok
Post,theforestmonksoftheWatNong
PahPonglineage
werepressuring
theCouncilofEldersandtheOfiiceofNational
Buddhismin
Thailand.‘toimpose
strictercontrolsonWesternmonkstostopthemfromordaining
women.They
alsowantthe
properties
ofThaitemples
intheWestto
comeundertheownership
oftheThaiSangha
toensurecomplete
control‘(‘ThaiMonksTarget
WesternClergy'2009),Many
Buddhist
teachers.solneofwhichare
contributorstothis
book.haveSigned
astatementofsupportforthefullordinationof
bhikkhunis.Throughexamples
like
this,itcanbeseenthat
BuddhisttraditionsinAustraliaaretrulyplural. Theyrange
fromthose who
maintain closelinkswith theirorigins.
tootherswhoforge
newground.
Thechapters
thatfollow.writtenby
bothmonasticsandteachersinvolvedinspreading
Buddhismin
Australia.furtherillus»iratethis.NotesI These include
publications by
Croucher
(I989).
Spuler(2000. 2002)andAbeyagunawardena(2009);
anda
specialissueoftheJournalqrGlobal
Buddhism.‘EuddhlsmInOceania'
(2008)that includeschapters
onBuddhism inAustraliaby
Bubnz-LiticandHiggins
(2007),
Eddy(2007)andMcAra(2007}.
Adetailedbibli»ngmphy
ofearlierreferencescanbefoundinanannotatedbibliographycompiledby
Spuler(2003a).
2 inthe
firstincident.aship
calledTampapickeduprefugees
whowereonaleaky
boatoil“thecoastofAustralia.TheHowardgovcmmcntrefused
toallowthe
refugeestobe
processed
inAustralia.intheChildrenOverboard
Affair.theHowardgovemmentclaimedthatrefugees
hadthrowntheirownchildrenoverboardsothatthey
wouldberescuedandabletosecureentranceinAustralia.AnAustralianinquirylaterfoundthatno
childrenhadbeenthrownoverboardandthatthegovernmentknewthispriortotheelection.whichthey
endedupwinning.
._—__—dl¥,