30
DavidBzrbnu—LiticaridWinter:
Higgins
Layinsightpractitioners
andother
progressivelaysupportersthereupon
aban-
doned thecentre. Adozen
lay teachers,
all membersofthe
recently
formed
Insight
Teachers‘CircleofAustralia
(ITCA).
published
astatementonthe
insight
communitywebsite,saying
that
they
couldno
longer
teachat
WBD,
given
the
genderimplications
ofthe
change
and
thedemocraticdeficititrevealed.Theaffair
brought
hometo
manyinsight
practitioners
forthefirsttimeboththe
incongruities
intheircommunionwiththe
Theravadininstitutionsthathadtrainedso
many
of
their
teachersandthe
inescapableorganizationalrequirements
of
layinsight
practice.
Thisconflictoverbasic moral
values
suddenly
lefl
layinsightpractitioners
around
Sydney
withouttheiraccustomed
institutionalbaseandretreatcentre.3
A
fewmonthslater
they
foundthemselves
alienatedfromtheirmost
important
inner
urbanbaseas
well,
theBuddhist
Library
andMeditation
Centre,
alsobecause
of
the
incongruity
betweendefactostatusasa
voluntary
association,
ontheone
hand,
andanauthoritarian
power
structure.
onthe
other,
It
too.hadbeena
lively,
well<resourced
meetingplace
forAsianand
western
Buddhists,
although
hereaswell
(to
referbackto
Numrich)
intersection
tended
tooccur
withoutinteraction.
Nonetheless.
the
library
hadthe
physical
capacity
tohostits
many largegatherings
and
introductory
coursesonmeditation and
Buddhism.aswellasthe
weeklysittings
ofseveral dharrna
groups,including
insight
groups.
Several
of
Sydney‘sinsight
teachers
taught
thereforanumber
of
years
andwrotefor
its
quality
newsletter,
DharmaVision.Butits
governance
structure
operated
as
essentially
thatofa
private
businesswithlittle
transparency,
underthedirectionofits
largest
benefactor:In
mid-2005,
thelatter
imposed
an
autocratic
managementstyle;
theBuddhist
Librarythereupon
cameto
exemplify
the
widespread
commodificationofthedharrnathat
Carretteand
King
analyse
(2005).
Feeling
intimidatedand
demoralized,
theentire
staff
offive
resigned
together
in
September
2005 Atthesame
time,
the
layinsight
teachersdecided
they
couldno
longerjustifyworking
withaninstitutionthatshowedsolittle
respect
for
people.
and their
sittinggroups
Iettwiththem.
Although
the
problem
here
was
quasi-corporate
rather
thanmonastic
authoritarianism.
therefusalofnormal
civicassociational
principlesproduced
thesameresultof
disrupting
the
pattern
of
‘parallelccngregations‘.
Inthewakeofthesetwocrisesin
2005.theinstitutionalbaseslefito
a
large
numberof
practitioners(not
leastthosein
Sydney)
were
sparse.
However,
the
onethat
already
existed
grewrapidly
andnewones
soon
began
to
emerge.
In
2000 asmall suburban
insight group.
the
Bluegum
Sangha
had
begun.
and
has
experiencedexponentialgrowth
since
2005.
withseveral
long-term
practi-
tioners
takingupteaching
rolesinit.In 2004the[TCAwasformedandwithits
cunent
membership
oflo
insight
meditationteachersfrom
Sydney.
Brisbane.thc
Northem
Rivers,Perth.Adelaide.
Alice
Springs
andCairns
(including
theformer
Phla
Khantipalo.
now
Laurence
Khantipalo).
itisthe
largestgroup
of
lay
Buddhist
teachersinAustralia.
Butin
Sydney
the
big
issuewashowto
replace
WBDas
themain
insight
retreat
centre,
especially
initsroleof
inviting
in
visiting
teachers.Outofaseriesof
Emergence
ofreculurinsightpractice
31
crisis
meetings
ofWBD
activistsin
2005,
anew
organization
—
SydneyInsight
Meditators
(SIM)
e
arose
totakeoverits
organizational
services
tothe
insight
tradition.Inotherwords.
itaimedtoinvite
local,
interstate
andoverseasteachers
to
give
talksandlead
retreatsand
workshops
around
Sydney
onasustainable
scaleTheinstitutional
lessonsoftheWEBcrisiswereforemost
inthefounders‘
minds:theirdocuments
insiston
gender
inclusiveness,
progressive
modernvalues
(including
ones
appropriate
todemocraticassociational
lite)
andasecularorien-
tation.Forthese
purposes,
the
organization's
foundersundertook
the
discipline
of
an
incorporatedvoluntary
association
underNewSouthWales
legislation
Inan
implicit
tributeto
‘global
Buddhism’,
SIMalso
consciously
followedthe
precedent
oftheSantaFe
Vipassana
Sangha
innot
tying
itself
to
anypanicttlar
teacher.
group
ofteachersor
approach
to
practice.
Itactsasanumbrella
organiz-
ationforanumberof
layinsight
sanghas
in
Sydney.starting
withthe
Btucgum
Sangha;
butnowforthree
timber
groups
7
theTortoise
Mountain,
GoldenWattle
andBeaches
sanghas.
Atthe
timeof
writing.
itsretreatandcourse
offerings
have.
insizeand
frequency,effectively
replaced
WBD‘searliercontribution
to
insight
practice.
Rethinking
doctrine.reworkingpractice
The
implications
of
thatwatershed
year,
2005,
speak
totwo
importantaspects
of
newlyemerging
variantsofdhanna
practice,
One
concerns thenature and
sourcesof
spiritual
authority;bymovingaway
from
thetraditionalinstitutional
authority
structures
ofthe
Theravada,
the
question
arises
astowhatdharrnictexts
shouldbe
regarded
asauthoritative.The
BluegumSangha's
response
hasbeento
distanceitselffrom
thecommentarialtraditionand
instituteasutra
studyprogram.
An
important
shiftin
emphasis
inthelatterwas
a
teaching
tour
byStephen
and
MartineBatchelor
inlate 2004 andthefarmer’scritical
viewoftheTheravadin
commentarial
tradition and
approaches
to
insight
meditationbascd on it
e
as
against
the
Buddha‘sown
teaching
inthe Fall
canon.An
important
sourceof
Batchelor's
scepticism
isNanaviraThera's
midAtwentieth-centuryunderground
classic.
Clearing
thePath
(1987).
Thatauthor
puts
thematter
bluntly: having
nominatedthe
very
fewPalisources
7
including
the
"thaylls
(themed
collections
ofsutras)
e
that
canclaim
authenticity.
headds:
'[N]o
other
Palibookswhatsoever
shottldbetaken
as
authoritative;
and
ignorance
ofthem
(and
particularly
ofthe
traditional
Commentaries)may
becounteda
positiveadvantage,
as
leaving
lessto
beunleamed'
(Nanavira
1987:
5).
The
BluegumSangha
choseasitsfirsttextbooksthefirstsutra-based
biography,
The
Lifeofthe
Buddha,
by
Nanavira'sclosefriend.Nanamoli
(1972).
Totheir
surprise,
some
Iong»time
insight
students have foundthemselves
not
simply
leaming
the
art
ofreading
sutras,
butalso
acquainting
themselves
witha
radically
differentsenseof
thefounderhimself.
Religious
Buddhism
hastendedto
ignore
hermeneutic
questions
andhastreated
theBuddha’s
teachings
asthetimelessrevelationsofatranscendent
beingwholly
removedfrom
anyearthly
historical context. Inthis
way.they
follow
another