Fortean Times – September 2019

(Barré) #1
38 FT383

THE ‘OCCULT EXPLOSION’
Charles Manson and theFamily emerged
out of this post-war interest in ‘slipstream
knowledge’. Manson arrived in San
Francisco in March 1967, having been in
jail since 1961 onchargesrelating to prior
parole violations and trafficking across
state lines.While inside, Manson, the thief,
hustler, conman and pimp, came under the
sway of the usual prison influences, but he
alsoread Robert Heinlein’s sciencefi ction
novelStranger in a Strange Land(1961),
learntabout L Ron Hubbard, Dianetics
and Scientology from his cellmate Lanier
Ramer, and sawThe Beatles perform on the
Ed Sullivan Showin 1964.When he arrived
in SanFrancisco’sgrowing countercultural
enclave of Haight-Ashbury (seeFT356:40-
47 ), Mansonwould have benefitted from its
crashpads, streetcharity and legal clinics,
but he alsowould have beenable to bask
in the harmonious sense of good will and
positive energy as the area transformed
into thesymboliccapital of the Summer of
Love. He looked the part; he carried – along
with practicallyevery other new arrival – a
guitar on which he played hisown songs,
and with a headful ofThe Beatles, Heinlein
and Hubbard, he quickly tuned into the
Haight’swavelength.With its communes, its
cosmicmysticism, its emphasis on free sex
and its clear desire tochallenge the social
mores of the day,Stranger in a Strange Land
already had its place in the countercultural
mindset when Manson arrived. Indeed, one
of Heinlein’s Martian coinages, theverb
‘grok’, meaning to know or to understand
something to the point ofabsorption, hadby
1967 become part of whatJay Stevens has
called the “hippiesprecht”. This “charged

code” helped to mark out one’s membership
of the counterculture while also succinctly
expressing itskey ideas. Mansongrokked
the Haight and the Haightgrokked him
back.^7
At the same time, artists like the
fi lmmaker and magicianKenneth Anger
(seeFT231:51-52) were makinggrand
claimsabout the historical significance
of Haight-Ashbury and the community it
supported. Anger saw thegrowth of the post-
war counterculture as marking an epochal
change in human culture, a transition to
what he termed –following Aleister Crowley


  • the‘Aeon of Horus’, a spiritual period
    definedby the “crowned and conquering
    child”. Others dubbed this paradigm shift
    the coming of the Age of Aquarius. Although
    Anton LaVey had littlerespectfor his
    neighbours in the Haight, the seemingly
    passive and sheep-like ‘hippies’, the Church
    of Satanfollowed a similar tack.For LaVey,
    Satanwas not a deity who demanded
    worship somuch as an aspect of one’s
    personality thatrequired acknowledgement.
    “Satanrepresents indulgence, instead of
    abstinence!” he preached from the pages of
    The Satanic Bible, “vitalexistence, instead of


spiritual pipe dreams!... undefiled wisdom
instead ofhypocritical self-deceit!” LaVey’s
Satanism encouraged afocus on the self, the
exercise of individual desires in theabsence
of a Christian morality that pushes the
guilt-riddenworshipper towards humility,
piety and subservience to a higher authority.
LaVey had no interest in the communality
of the stereotypical SanFranciscan
counterculture but just like the hippies
who gathered in Golden GatePark for the
Human Be-In inJanuary 1967, the Church of
Satanwas steppingaway from theexpected
conventions of American Society.^8
Writing inThe Family(1971), his early
account of the Manson case, Ed Sanders
suggested that the tendrils of an occult
conspiracy connected Manson, the Church
of Satan and othergroups like the Process
Church of theFinal Judgement (see
FT134:34-39). These zones didoverlap
within the intense bubble of 1960s San
Francisco: in 1966 Susan Atkinswas a go-go
dancer in aWitches’ Sabbat-themedrevue
show organisedby Anton LaVey; as hewas
gathering together the embryonic Family
in 1967, Manson lived in Haight Ashbury
close to the Process Church’s SanFrancisco
chapterhouse; andFamily member Bobby
Beausoleilwas a close associate ofKenneth
Anger, having starred in thefi rst version
of Anger’s occult-epicLucifer Rising. That
said, such links arerather more coincidental
than actively conspiratorial.The ‘w eb’, as it
were, of associations that surround Manson
and theFamily speak less of agrand project
with sinister intent and more to thefact that
parallel, occasionally intersecting,groups
proliferated in the mid to late 1960s.^9
America’s ‘Occult Explosion’was a typical

STEVE


LYON / CREATIVE COMMONS


ABOVE LEFT: The remains of Barker Ranch, DeathValley, where Manson and followers were arested in October 1969 (for petty crimes unrelated to the murders).
ABOVE RIGHT: Robert E Heinlein’sStranger in a Strange Landwas influential on both the Manson Family and the wider countercultural scene of the late Sixties.

“Satanrepresents

indulgence instead

of abstinence!”

LaVey preached
Free download pdf