Claims of
Reincarnation
An Empirical Study of Cases in
India
Satwant K Pasricha
White Crow Books 2019
Pb, 304pp, bib, ind, £14.99, ISBN 9781786771032
There have not been many
serious studies of ‘reincarnation’
since Professor Ian Stevenson’s
prolific output through the
late 1970s and 1980s, which
built upon his acclaimed 1966
studyTwenty Cases Suggestive of
Reincarnation(revised in 1974).
Dr Pasricha, a leading clinical
psychologist at the Himalayan
Institute of Medical Sciences,
here inherits Stevenson’s
mantle. It is the first book with
a systematicfocus upon classic
cases of the Indian typefor more
than 30years. First published
in 1990, itexpands her 1978
doctoral thesis (which set outa
methodologyfor in vestigating
andevaluating cases) witha
further 15-yearresearch period
in which she interviewed
“hundreds” of subjects, mainly
from northern India.
For those interested in what
she learned, the case material
is fascinating indeed. Stevenson
himself acknowledges that they
“may seem difficult to believe”,
especiallyfor a reader new
to the subject, but offers his
unequivocal endorsementfor the
fidelity ofPasricha’swork and
her professional opinion. She isa
curious scientist labouring at the
coalface of what seems to bea
genuinemystery.
It is all carefully presented,
with an introductorychapter
whichreviews the history of the
subject, and others outlining
her methods of interviewing
andevaluatingresponses.The
results ofover 300 interviews (of
varying thoroughness) conducted
by herself are sampled – with
more attention to 45 cases which
provide extra details or more
confirmatory data – andfollowed
by an equally interesting
chapterexploring the effect
of the circumstances upon the
behaviour, psychology and
beliefs (religious and otherwise)
of the claimants and their
families.
The Indian cases are also
compared to cases fromTurkey,
Sri Lanka, and the North
American tribes of Tlingit and
Haida. Sceptics will shudder at
the discussions of associated
paranormal phenomena that
Dr Pasricha encountered in the
lives of her interviewees – many
of whomwere children in often
poorfamilies – but she felt, to
her credit, that she could not
ignore or censor their accounts.
In conclusion,Pasricha discusses
various associated theories and
explanations.
Up to now, the subject of
reincarnation in particular
seems to trigger the outrage of
militantrational sceptics.The
claim that distinguishing marks
and scars from a ‘past life’ have
shown up on the new incarnate’s
body, for example, a subject that
interested Stevenson, has been
dismissed as quintessentially
preposterous because there is
no known physical or genetic
mode of transmission.While the
sceptics draw their line there,
Dr Pasricha freely admits that
much about the subject is still
mysterious.
In contrast, she ismuch more
adventurousabout testing
alternative and ‘paranormal’
theories against her data.The
moremundaneexplanations
involve suggestion, fraud,
fantasy, cryptomnesia and
paramnesia.The more
complicated psychological cases
involve explanations based
upon ESP and ‘personation’,
hypnoticregression, near-
deathexperiences andeven
‘possession’.
Sheexamines her
case material to show
how these typeswere
identified andrejected,
and feels justified in
proposing that the
remainder support the
theory ofreincarnation.
In this, she crosses the
limit imposedby sceptics
and bravely tackleshypotheses
which seem to arise out of the
otherwise unexplained data;for
example, some psychicalform
of transmission that transcends
time and space, or someform of
psychosomaticexpressionby the
old ‘soul’ in its new body.
Heryoung and often poorly-
educated communicants go on
to tell of stranger things, such
as theirexistence beyond death
and how theyreturned to a new
life.These ideas, while heretical
to Western medical science,
heave beenfamiliar to all classes
of Indian society (and to some
other cultures aswell) as part of
theirreligious and philosophical
traditions.
Anyreader who is unfamiliar
with the Hindu andTheosophical
literature on karma and
reincarnation willwelcome her
chapters on this background
which informs her conclusions.
Sceptics will, no doubt, condemn
this as a backward and non-
scientific step, yet shefaces up
to the prospect of such criticism
by resting her case material ina
clear and logical presentation of
the phenomenology derived from
a statistical analysis of her cases.
One complaint might be
that her presentation of her
case material is not clinically
detached or laid out to academic
standards... but then, this is
not a thesis, and her interviews
clearly reveal DrPasricha’s
sympathetic treatment of her
‘cases’ asreal people.
It also makesfor easier
reading.
Here, then, is the
result of arareand
sober investigation
which deserves
to beread by all.
It would be quite
‘unscientific’ to shun Dr
Pasricha’sresearch as
‘unbelievable’, fraud or self-
deception.
She pleadsfor further
investigation and consideration
of herwork and the subject
itself, and that should be the only
intelligent and matureresponse
from the Establishment.The
generalreader will findmuch in
this careful and impressive study
to stimulate their astonishment
andwonder.
It seems to me to bea
groundbreaking book with
far-reaching implications. Dr
Pasricha has dared to ask honest
questionsabout a subject
scornedby the arrogantly
ignorantfor too long.While
she might not have any solid
and satisfying answers, she
is definitely asking the right
questions.
For thesereasons, I heartily
recommend it.
Bob Rickard
HHHH
“The subject of
reincarnation seems
to trigger the
outrage of militant
rational sceptics”
FT383 63
Who wants to return as a can of milk?
The author of this study does not censor the accounts byyoung and poor claimants; however, it is
aiming not at academic purity but at reflecting theexperiences of the real people she interviewed
SEND REVIEW COPIES OF BOOKSTO: BOOK REVIEWS,FORTEAN TIMES, PO BOX 2409,LONDON NW5 4NP, UK.
REVIEWS / BOOKS