Sometimes more gets said when nothing changesthan when big changes occur. Take for example,Intel’s shiny new CPU, code-named Prescott.Despite several marked changes, Intel is downplay-ing the much anticipated release of a CPU thatcould have easily warranted a Pentium 5 label.New SSE instructions almost single-handedlycompelled Intel to drop the Pentium II name forPentium III. Similarly, when Intel instituted SSEinstructions and a completely redesigned core, itcouldn’t help but adopt the Pentium 4 moniker.Prescott features a new instruction set called SSE3, aredesigned pipeline that will take the chip up to 5GHz,double the cache, and a major die shrink. Thus thequestion: Why isn’t Intel calling this new chip Pentium5? And why the muted fanfare surrounding Prescott?And does it contain dormant 64-bit extensions?We’ve got answers. ËMARCH 2004 MAXIMUMPC 29
Pr escott at a glanceNAME...........................................................................Pentium 4
CODE-NAME.................................................................Prescott
CLOCK SPEED.........................................................3.4GHz “E”
DIE SIZE.........................................................................112mm^2
TRANSISTORS.........................................................125 million
L1 CACHE...........................................................................16KB
L2 CACHE............................................................................1MB
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS.............................................MMX,
SSE, SSE2, SSE
PROCESS.............................................................90 nanometer
using strained siliconWhy Isn’t Prescott
Pentium 5?
How does Intel’s new Prescott CPU stack up? Is it worthy
of residence in your existing motherboard? Maximum PC
Senior Editor Gordon Mah Ung investigates the low-key
release of a redesigned, feature-laden chip that deserves
to be called Pentium 5, yet surprisingly isn’t
BY GORDON MAH UNG