- WEAK SOLUTION FORMULATION 375
D^2 f ( x) uniformly on Bp ( !r) \ W 01. This in turn implies that b..9 fc:k ___,. b..9 f
uniformly on Bp ( !r) \ W 01. We compute using b..fc:k S 0,
Since meas (W 01 ) S 51 and b..f E Lfoc by Remark 7.123(i), if we let 51 ___,. O+,
then f w b..f · <pdμ 9 ___,. 0 and
"1
r, 1 b..<pdμ9 s r
1
b..J. <pdμ9 = r, b..J. <pdμ9.
JM JBP(2r) JM
If b..f s k in the support sense, then by Remark 7.123(iii), f satisfies
b..f s k a.e. on M. Combining this with (7.145), we get
JM f b..<pdμ9 s JM <pkdμ9.
(ii) This equivalence is well known. One can find a proof that f satisfies
b..f s k in the viscosity sense if and only if f is a supersolution of b..f s k
in L. Hormander's book [205] on p. 147, Proposition 3.2.10. One can find a
proof in Juutinen, Lindqvist, and Manfredi [226] that f satisfying b..f skin
the viscosity sense is equivalent to b..f s k holding in the weak sense, where
they actually prove the equivalence for div (1\7 flp-^2 \7 f) s k for p > 0.
Actually, the equivalence of the notions of weak and viscosity supersolutions
was first proved by Ishii and Lions [214]. D
9.5. Comparison theory for Riemannian distance d and re-
duced distance £. As a simple application of the results in the previous
subsection we consider the distance function d on a Riemannian manifold
and the reduced distance f of a solution to the backward Ricci flow.